为了研究页岩气降压开采过程中吸附气解吸作用对基质表观物性（如有效孔隙半径、有效孔隙度、表观渗透率）及气体流动机制的影响,推导了吸附解吸作用下页岩基质孔隙有效半径和表观渗透率动态模型,建立了考虑吸附解吸影响基质表观物性和气体传输机制的页岩气渗流数学模型。采用有限体积法对模型进行求解,利用实验及矿场数据验证了模型的可靠性,最后应用该模型研究了页岩气开采过程中基质物性参数、气体流动机制变化特征以及吸附效应对页岩气开发的影响规律。研究结果表明,页岩气开采过程中基质孔隙有效半径、有效孔隙度和表观渗透率逐渐变大,体积压裂改造区域流动机制由滑脱流转变为过渡流;忽略吸附层影响将导致地质储量和产气量严重高估;随着吸附层厚度增加,累计产气量变化不大,但采收率逐渐降低。图12表1参25
The adsorption/desorption effects impact the petro-physical properties of matrix pores during gas depressurizing production, such as effective pore radius, effective porosity, apparent permeability, which will further impact the gas flow regime. In this paper, the dynamic models of effective pore radius and apparent permeability under the action of gas adsorption/desorption are derived. The mathematical model of shale gas flow is established considering the effects of adsorbed gas on apparent properties and gas flow regime. After that, the model is solved and validated using a finite volume method and experimental and field data. Finally, the variations of apparent parameters of matrix pores and gas flow regimes during gas production, and the influences of adsorption on gas production are demonstrated. The results show that the effective pore radius, porosity and apparent permeability increase during gas production; the gas flow regime in stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) changes from slip flow to transition flow; if the impacts of adsorbed gas on gas production is overlooked, both original gas in place (OGIP) and gas production will be significantly overestimated. The cumulative gas production changes slightly as the adsorption layer thickness increases, but the gas recovery factor decreases.
[1] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王玉满, 等. 中国页岩气进展、挑战及前景（一）[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(6): 689-701.
ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, WANG Yuman, et al. Shale gas in China: Progress, challenges and prospects (Ⅰ)[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(6): 689-701.
[2] GHANIZADEH A, AQUINO S, CLARKSON C R, et al. Petrophysical and geomechanical characteristics of Canadian tight oil and liquid-rich gas reservoirs[R]. SPE 171633, 2014.
[3] AKKUTLU I Y, FATHI E. Multiscale gas transport in shales with local kerogen heterogeneities[R]. SPE 146422, 2011.
[4] ADESIDA A G, AKKUTLU I Y, RESASCO D E, et al. Kerogen pore size distribution of Barnett shale using DFT analysis and Monte Carlo simulations[R]. SPE 147397, 2011.
[5] CURTIS J B. Fractured shale-gas systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11): 1921-1938.
[6] AMBROSE R J, HARTMAN R C, DIAZ -CAMPOS M, et al. New pore-scale considerations for shale gas in place calculations[R]. SPE 131772, 2010.
[7] HARTMAN R C, WEARHERFORD L, AMBROSE R J, et al. Shale gas-in-place calculations part II: Multi-component gas adsorption effects[R]. SPE 144097, 2011.
[8] SIGAL R F. The effect of gas adsorption on storage and transport of methane in organic shales[R]. New Orleans, Louisiana: SPWLA 54 th Annual Logging Symposium, 2013.
[9] 王香增, 高胜利, 高潮. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部中生界陆相页岩气地质特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(3): 294-304.
WANG Xiangzeng, GAO Shengli, GAO Chao. Geological features of Mesozoic continental shale gas in south of Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3): 294-304.
[10] ROSS D J K, BUSTIN R M. Impact of mass balance calculations on adsorption capacities in microporous shale gas reservoirs[J]. Fuel, 2007, 86: 2696-2706.
[11] JAVADPOUR F, FISHER D, UNSWORTH M. Nanoscale gas flow in shale gas sediments[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2007, 46(10): 55-61.
[12] BIRD R B, STEWART W E, LIGHTFOOT E N. Transport phenomena[M]. Rev. 2nd ed. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2002.
[13] SHI J T, ZHANG L, LI Y S, et al. Diffusion and flow mechanisms of shale gas through matrix pores and gas production forecasting[R]. SPE 167226, 2013.
[14] 杨峰, 宁正福, 胡昌蓬, 等. 页岩储层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(2): 301-311.
YANG Feng, NING Zhengfu, HU Changpeng, et al. Characterization of microscopic pore structures in shale reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(2): 301-311.
[15] 侯宇光, 何生, 易积正, 等. 页岩孔隙结构对甲烷吸附能力的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(2): 248-256.
HOU Yuguang, HE Sheng, YI Jizheng, et al. Effect of pore structure on methane sorption capacity of shales[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(2): 248-256.
[16] CARMAN P C. Flow of gases through porous media[M]. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications, 1956.
[17] CIVAN F. Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability in tight porous media[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2010, 82: 375-384.
[18] ROUQUEROL J, ROUQUEROL F, SING K S W. Adsorption by powers and porous solids: Principles, methodology and applications[M]. London: Academic Press, 1999.
[19] SOLAR C, BLANCO A G, VALLONE A, et al. Adsorption of methane in porous materials as the basis for the storage of natural gas[M]. Rijeka: InTech Europe, 2010.
[20] ROY S, RAJU R, CHUANG H F, et al. Modeling gas flow through microchannels and nanopores[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2003, 93(8): 4870-4879.
[21] CIVAN F, RAI C S, SONDERGELD C H. Shale-gas permeability and diffusivity inferred by improved formulation of relevant retention and transport mechanisms[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2011, 86: 925-944.
[22] PONG K C, HO C M, LIU J Q, et al. Non-linear pressure distribution in uniform micro-channels: Applications of microfabrication to fluid mechanics[J]. ASME Fluids Engineering Division, 1994, 197: 51-56.
[23] YU W, SEPEHRNOORI K. Simulation of gas desorption and geomechanics effects for unconventional gas reservoirs[R]. SPE 165377, 2013.
[24] CMG. GEM user guide[M]. Calgary, Canada: Computer Modeling Group Ltd., 2011.
[25] XIONG X, DEVEGOWDA D, MICHEL G G, et al. A fully-coupled free and adsorptive phase transport model for shale gas reservoirs including non-Darcy flow effects[R]. SPE 159758, 2012.
