利用X射线衍射（XRD）矿物分析、X射线能量色散光谱分析（EDS）、扫描电镜（SEM）、聚焦离子束扫描电镜（FIB-SEM）等手段,对加拿大魁北克省奥陶系Utica页岩矿物成分、孔隙度、微观孔隙结构、表面润湿性等岩石物理特性进行了研究。压汞仪测试结果显示测试样品的孔隙直径在15~200 nm;XRD矿物分析和EDS元素测试显示Utica页岩中的非黏土矿物以方解石和石英为主,黏土矿物以伊利石和绿泥石为主;利用SEM对岩心表面孔喉进行了观测,图像显示Utica页岩中发育多种类型的孔隙,比如粒内孔、粒间孔、有机质孔等,其中,有机物（干酪根）中的孔隙在纳米级别（10~50 nm）;利用FIB-SEM完成了250张扫描电镜图像,利用这些图像重建了三维层析成像模型和孔隙分布几何模型。润湿性测试结果显示,Utica岩心样品呈弱水湿—中性润湿,水力压裂过程中大部分添加剂可以将页岩表面改变成更倾向于水相润湿的状态。图13表2参17
With multiple techniques, the following measurements and analysis were made to characterize the Ordovician Utica shale samples: mineralogy, porosity, microstructure, and surface wettability etc. The test of mercury injection apparatus showed that the pore size of Utica shale is 15-200 nm. X-ray diffraction (XRD) mineralogy analysis and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) indicated that in Utica shale non-clay minerals are dominated by calcite and quartz, while clay minerals by illite and chlorite. With the images from scanning electron microscope (SEM), the surface microstructure examination showed various types of pores exist in Utica shale, such as intragranular, intergranular, organic etc. And the pores in organic matter (kerogen) were found in nanometer size (10 to 50 nm). A three-dimensional tomography model and a geometry model of the pores space using FIB-SEM imaging tomography were reconstructed with 250 SEM images. It provides visual insights into the petrophysical properties of Utica shale. Finally, the wettability tests displayed that Utica shale has weak-water wet to intermediate wettability.
[1] US Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Outlook 2014[R]. Washington: US Energy Information Administration, 2014.
[2] USGS. World petroleum assessment[EB/OL]. [2015-04-01]. http://pubs. usgs.gov/dds/dds-060/.
[3] US Energy Information Administration. Drilling productivity report 2014[R].Washington: US Energy Information Administration, 2014.
[4] CHALMERS G, BUSTIN R, POWERS I. A pore by any other name would be as small: The importance of meso-and microporosity in shale gas capacity[R]. Denver: AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, 2009.
[5] LOUCKS R G, REED R M, RUPPEL S C, et al. Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2009, 79(12): 848-861.
[6] WANG F P, REED R M. Pore networks and fluid flow in gas shales[R]. SPE 124253-MS, 2009.
[7] AMBROSE R, HARTMAN R, DIAZ-CAMPOS M, et al. Shale gas-in-place calculations (Part Ⅰ): New pore-scale considerations[J]. SPE Journal, 2012, 17(1): 219-229.
[8] SONDERGELD C H, AMBROSE R J, RAI C S, et al. Micro-structural studies of gas shales[R]. SPE 131771-MS, 2010.
[9] CURTIS M E, AMBROSE R J, SONDERGELD C H. Structural characterization of gas shales on the micro-and nano-scales[R]. SPE 137693-MS, 2010.
[10] SHANG C, RICE J A, EBERL D D, et al. Measurement of illite particle thickness using a direct Fourier transform of small-angle X-ray scattering data[J]. Clays and Clay Minerals, 2003, 51(3): 293-300.
[11] LAVOIE J Y, MARCIL J S, DORRINS P K, et al. Natural gas potential in the Saint Lawrence Lowlands of Quebec: A case study[R]. SPE 137593-MS, 2010.
[12] WARDLAW N C, TAYLOR R. Mercury capillary pressure curves and the intepretation of pore structure and capillary behaviour in reservoir rocks[J]. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 1976, 24(2): 225-262.
[13] AGUILERA R. Log analysis of gas-bearing fracture shales in the Saint Lawrence Lowlands of Quebec[R]. SPE 7445-MS, 1978.
[14] AGUILERA R. Flow units: From conventional to tight gas to shale gas reservoirs[R]. SPE 132845-MS, 2010.
[15] GHOSH S K, URSCHEL S F, FRIEDMAN G M. Substitution of simulated well-cuttings for core plugs in the petrophysical analysis of dolostones: Permian San Andres formation, Texas[J]. Carbonates and Evaporites, 1988, 2(2): 95-100.
[16] ZHANG D L, LIU S, PUERTO M, et al. Wettability alteration and spontaneous imbibition in oil-wet carbonate formations[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2006, 52: 213-226.
[17] CHILINGARIAN G, FRIEDMAN G. Carbonate reservoir characterization: A geologic-engineering analysis, Part 1[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 1993, 10(4): 351-352.
