石油勘探与开发 >

2016 , Vol. 43 >Issue 2: 219 - 227

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11698/PED.2016.02.07

油气勘探

致密储集层原油充注物理模拟——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例

  • 郑民 ,
  • 李建忠 ,
  • 吴晓智 ,
  • 李鹏 ,
  • 王文广 ,
  • 王社教 ,
  • 谢红兵
展开
  • 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院；
    2. 东北石油大学；
    3. 中国石油大学（华东）
郑民（1979-）,男,山东潍坊人,博士,中国石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师,主要从事油气资源战略及石油地质综合研究。地址：北京市海淀区学院路20号,中国石油勘探开发研究院油气资源规划研究所,邮政编码：100083。E-mail：zhenmin@petrochina.com.cn

网络出版日期: 2017-01-01

基金资助

国家科技重大专项（2011ZX05043）; 中国石油天然气集团公司科技重大专项（2013E-0502）; 中国石油勘探开发研究院创新项目（2012Y-006）

收起

Physical modeling of oil charging in tight reservoirs: A case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China

  • ZHENG Min ,
  • LI Jianzhong ,
  • WU Xiaozhi ,
  • LI Peng ,
  • WANG Wenguang ,
  • WANG Shejiao ,
  • XIE Hongbing
Expand
  • 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China;
    3. China University of Petroleum (Huadong), Qingdao 266580, China

Online published: 2017-01-01

Fold

摘要

选取准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组致密储集层岩心样品,进行原油充注物理模拟实验,研究致密储集层中原油的运移渗流规律及影响因素,分析致密油运聚特征和成藏下限条件。致密储集层内原油充注具有启动压力梯度与临界压力梯度两个具有界限特征的压力梯度点,存在低速非线性渗流和拟线性渗流两种特征;芦草沟组致密储集层原油充注过程中含油饱和度的增长过程可以分为跳跃增长型、快速增长型、平稳增长型3种类型,快速增长型样品所达到的最大含油饱和度最高,其次为平稳增长型,跳跃增长型最低;含油饱和度的增长受到孔隙度、渗透率、原油黏度、驱替压力梯度耦合控制,各要素相互影响、相互补偿。绘制的致密储集层原油聚集成藏判定图版显示,只有压力梯度突破临界压力梯度进入拟线性渗流区后,才能达到致密储集层含油饱和度为30%的下限值。稳定的致密储集层很难实现油气的先致密后成藏,而常规储集层油气充注后地层压实胶结与矿物次生加大胶结可能是形成致密油,并具有较高含油饱和度的原因。图8表3参22

关键词： 致密储集层; 原油充注物理模拟; 非线性渗流; 成藏下限; 吉木萨尔凹陷; 二叠系芦草沟组

本文引用格式

郑民 , 李建忠 , 吴晓智 , 李鹏 , 王文广 , 王社教 , 谢红兵 . 致密储集层原油充注物理模拟——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016 , 43(2) : 219 -227 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2016.02.07

Abstract

Modeling experiments of oil charging were conducted to find out patterns and affecting factors of oil migration and seepage in tight reservoirs, and analyze oil migration and accumulation and low limit conditions of tight oil accumulation using core samples from tight reservoir beds of the Permian Lucaogou Formation in the Jimsar Sag of the Junggar Basin. Crude oil charging in tight reservoir beds has two pressure gradient points (start-up pressure gradient and critical pressure gradient, and has two features: low velocity non-Darcy seepage, quasi-linear seepage). During crude oil charging in tight reservoir beds in the Lucaogou Formation, the process of oil saturation increase can be divided into three types: saltation increase, quick increase and stable increase. Samples of quick increase type reached the highest oil saturation, the second place is the stable increase type, and saltation increase type is the last. Oil saturation increase is controlled by the combined effect of porosity, permeability, oil viscosity and displacement pressure gradient. These factors interact and complement one another. By establishing template for oil accumulation in tight reservoir beds, it can be seen that only when pressure gradient breaks through the critical pressure gradient and the oil flow is quasi-linear, can oil saturation reaches the lower limit value (30%) in tight reservoir beds. It is hard for stable tight reservoir beds to become tight firstly and be charged with oil and gas later; while for conventional reservoir beds, after oil and gas charging, the formation compaction, cementation, and secondary mineral outgrowth may be the reasons for the formation of tight oil accumulation with high oil saturation.

Key words： tight reservoir; oil charging physical modeling; non-linear seepage; hydrocarbon accumulation threshold; Jimsar Sag; Permian Lucaogou Formation

参考文献

[1] 黄延章. 低渗透油层非线性渗流特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 1997, 4(1): 9-14.
HUANG Yanzhang. Nonlinear percolation feature in low permeability reservoir[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 1997, 4(1): 9-14.
[2] 姚约东, 葛家理. 石油渗流新的运动形态及其规律[J]. 重庆大学学报(自然科学版), 2000(S1): 150-153.
YAO Yuedong, GE Jiali. Study on the new pattern and its rules of oil flow in porous media[J]. Journal of Chongqing University(Natural Science Edition), 2000(S1): 150-153.
[3] 姚约东, 葛家理, 魏俊之. 低渗透油层渗流规律的研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2001, 28(4): 73-75.
YAO Yuedong, GE Jiali, WEI Junzhi. Study on the fluid flow in low permeability reservoir[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2001, 28(4): 73-75.
[4] 姚约东, 葛家理. 低渗透油藏不稳定渗流规律的研究[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 27(2): 55-58.
YAO Yuedong, GE Jiali. Non-steady flow in low-permeability reservoir[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China(Edition of Natural Science), 2003, 27(2): 55-58.
[5] 姚约东, 葛家理, 李相方. 低渗透油藏油水两相渗流研究[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 29(2): 52-56.
YAO Yuedong, GE Jiali, LI Xiangfang. Oil water two-phase fluid flow in low permeability reservoir[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China(Edition of Natural Science), 2005, 29(2): 52-56.
[6] 邓英尔, 刘慈群. 低渗油藏非线性渗流规律数学模型及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2001, 22(4): 72-77.
DENG Yinger, LIU Ciqun. Mathematical model of nonlinear flow law in low permeability porous media and its application[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2001, 22(4): 72-77.
[7] 邓英尔, 刘慈群, 庞宏伟. 考虑多因素的低渗透岩石相对渗透率[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2003, 24(2): 152-154.
DENG Yinger, LIU Ciqun, PANG Hongwei. Calculation of relative permeability of low permeability rock with multiple factors[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2003, 24(2): 152-154.
[8] 李中锋, 何顺利. 低渗透储层非达西渗流机理探讨[J]. 特种油气藏, 2005, 12(2): 35-38.
LI Zhongfeng, HE Shunli. Non-Darcy percolation mechanism in low permeability reservoir[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2005, 12(2): 35-38.
[9] 齐银, 张宁生, 任晓娟, 等. 超低渗储层单相油渗流特征试验研究[J]. 石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报), 2005, 27(2): 104-106.
QI Yin, ZHANG Ningsheng, REN Xiaojuan, et al. Experimental study on the flowing characteristics of single phase oil in super-low permeability reservoirs[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology (Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute), 2005, 27(2): 104-106.
[10] 朱志强, 曾溅辉, 王建君, 等. 油气成藏条件下低渗透砂岩石油运移的渗流特征实验研究[J]. 现代地质, 2009, 23(4): 761-766.
ZHU Zhiqiang, ZENG Jianhui, WANG Jianjun, et al. An experimental study on flow characteristics of oil migration in low-permeability sandstone under condition of oil accumulation[J]. Geoscience, 2009, 23(4): 761-766.
[11] 赵靖舟, 吴少波, 武富礼. 论低渗透储层的分类与评价标准: 以鄂尔多斯盆地为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 28-31, 53.
ZHAO Jingzhou, WU Shaobo, WU Fuli. The classification and evaluation criterion of low permeability reservoir: An example from Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 28-31, 53.
[12] 贾承造, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等. 中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(3): 343-350.
JIA Chengzao. ZOU Caineng, LI Jianzhong, et al. Assessment criteria, main types, basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3): 343-350.
[13] 王宜林, 张义杰, 王国辉, 等. 准噶尔盆地油气勘探开发成果及前景[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2002, 23(6): 449-455.
WANG Yilin, ZHANG Yijie, WANG Guohui, et al. Achievements and prospect for petroleum exploration and development in Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2002, 23(6): 449-455.
[14] 王屿涛. 准噶尔盆地主要烃源岩生烃模拟实验及地质意义[J]. 新疆石油地质, 1998, 19(5): 377-382.
WANG Yutao. Hydrocarbon-generation simulation test of major source rock and its significance in Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1998, 19(5): 377-382.
[15] 张义杰, 齐雪峰, 程显胜, 等. 准噶尔盆地晚石炭世和二叠纪沉积环境[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2007, 28(6): 673-675.
ZHANG Yijie, QI Xuefeng, CHENG Xiansheng, et al. Approach to sedimentary environment of Late Carboniferous-Permian in Junggar basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2007, 28(6): 673-675.
[16] 王晓琦, 孙亮, 朱如凯, 等. 利用电子束荷电效应评价致密储集层储集空间: 以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(4): 472-480.
WANG Xiaoqi, SUN Liang, ZHU Rukai, et al. Application of charging effects in evaluating storage space of tight reservoirs: A case study from Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar sag, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(4): 472-480.
[17] 杜金虎, 何海清, 杨涛, 等. 中国致密油勘探进展及面临的挑战[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2014, 19(1): 1-9.
DU Jinhu, HE Haiqing, YANG Tao, et al. Progress in China’s tight oil exploration and challenges[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2014, 19(1): 1-9.
[18] 国家能源局. 油气储层评价方法: SY/T 6285—2011[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2011: 1-15.
National Energy Administration. Evaluating methods of oil and gas reservoirs: SY/T 6285—2011[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2011: 1-15.
[19] KAMENSKY G N. 地下水动力学原理[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1955: 55-58.
KAMENSKY G N. Groundwater dynamics[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1955: 55-58.
[20] 闫庆来, 何秋轩, 阮敏, 等. 低渗透油层渗流机理研究[C]//低渗透油田开发技术: 全国低渗透油田开发技术座谈会论文选. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1994: 350-355.
YAN Qinglai, HE Qiuxuan, RUAN Min, et al. The research of flow mechanism of low permeability formation[C]//Development technique of low permeability oil-fields: Colloquium papers of national symposium of development technique of low permeability oil-fields. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1994: 350-355.
[21] 冯文光. 非达西低速渗流的研究现状与展望[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1986, 13(4): 76-80.
FENG Wenguang. Current situation and prospect of non-Darcy low-velocity percolation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1986, 13(4): 76-80.
[22] 熊伟, 雷群, 刘先贵, 等. 低渗透油藏拟启动压力梯度[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(2): 232-236.
XIONG Wei, LEI Qun, LIU Xiangui, et al. Pseudo threshold pressure gradient to flow for low permeability reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(2): 232-236.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

版权所有：《石油勘探与开发》编辑部；《石油勘探与开发（英文）》编辑部
地址：北京市海淀区学院路20号，中国石油勘探开发研究院数据中心605室　

京ICP备15044687号    技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司