针对塔里木油田哈拉哈塘地区超深高温碳酸盐岩缝洞型岩溶储集层溶洞在三维空间归位不准确的问题,提出了陆地随钻地震测井（SVWD）和地震导向钻井（SGD）技术相结合的综合解决方案。地震导向钻井技术利用随钻地震测井获取的地层速度更新速度模型,对所钻目标体的三维空间位置重新归位,降低了目标体的不确定性。该方案应用于哈拉哈塘地区两口井,首次在国内陆上油田采集随钻地震数据,根据预测结果实时指导和调整钻井轨迹,两口井均顺利命中目标。实践证明该套技术方案在解决由于速度不确定性以及地质模型的不确定性导致的储集体归位不准确等难题时切实可行。图7参11
史鸿祥, 李辉, 郑多明, 邹克元, 耿长波, 刘伟, 刘延梅, 甄玲霞, 张辉
. 基于随钻地震测井的地震导向钻井技术——以塔里木油田哈拉哈塘区块缝洞型储集体为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016
, 43(4)
: 662
-668
.
DOI: 10.11698/PED.2016.04.21
To deal with the inaccurate three-dimensional positioning of caves in the ultra-deep and high temperature Ordovician carbonate fracture-cave reservoirs in the Halahatang block, this article proposes a new integrated solution which combines seismic guided drilling (SGD) with onshore seismic while drilling (SVWD). SGD technique uses the newly acquired velocity by SVWD to update velocity model and re-place the target position in three-dimensional space to decrease the uncertainty of the target. The primary drilling targets of two wells in the Halahatang block have been selected to verify this solution. It’s the first time to collect onshore SVWD date domestically. The two wells landed in the target successfully by guiding and adjusting wellbore trajectory according to near real-time prediction results obtained from SVWD data. The success of these two wells shows the solution combining SVWD with SGD is practicable in solving the misplacing of target reservoirs caused by velocity and geological model uncertainty.
[1] 赵文智, 沈安江, 周进高, 等. 礁滩储集层类型、特征、成因及勘探意义: 以塔里木和四川盆地为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(3): 257-267.
ZHAO Wenzhi, SHEN Anjiang, ZHOU Jin’gao, et al. Types, characteristics, origin and exploration significance of reef-shoal reservoirs: A case study of Tarim Basin, NW China and Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3): 257-267.
[2] ESMERSOY C, KANIA A, KASHIKAR S, et al. Optimum use of seismic data to reduce drilling risk and improve well placement[R]. Houston: 73 rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, 2011.
[3] ESMERSOY C, RAMIREZ A, TEEBENNY S, et al. A new, fully integrated method for seismic geohazard prediction ahead of the bit while drilling[J]. The Leading Edge, 2013, 32(10): 1222-1233.
[4] PENG C, DAI J, YANG S. Seismic guided drilling: Near real time 3D updating of subsurface images and pore pressure model[R]. Tulsa: 6 th International Petroleum Technology Conference, 2013.
[5] YANG H, PAN W, CHEN L, et al. Seismic description of karst topography and caves of Ordovician carbonate reservoirs, Lungu area, Tarim Basin, West China[R]. Tulsa: SEG, 2010: 1256-1260.
[6] ESMERSOY C, YANG Y, SAYERS C M, et al. Seismic solutions for drilling: Real-time pore-pressure estimation ahead of the bit[R]. Copenhagen, Denmark: 74 th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, 2012.
[7] ESMERSOY C, RAMIREZ A, HANNAN A, et al. Guiding drilling by look ahead using seismic and LWD data[R]. SPE 164786, 2013.
[8] ESMERSOY C, HAWTHORN A, DURRAND C, et al. Seismic MWD: Drilling in time, on time, it’s about time[J]. The Leading Edge, 2005, 24(1): 56-62.
[9] CHANDRASEKHAR S, DOTIWALA F, LIM T K, et al. Reducing target uncertainties and guided drilling using seismic while drilling technology, a novel approach in Andaman Sea deep water[R]. SPE 165834, 2013.
[10] SHI H X, PENG G X, ZHENG D M, et al. Integration of surface seismic and well information to improve drilling success for onshore carbonate caves[R]. Amsterdam: 76 th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, 2014.
[11] OSYPOV K, NICHOLS D, WOODWARD M, et al. From quantifying seismic uncertainty to assessing E&P risks and the value of information[R]. Houston: 81 st SEG Annual International Meeting, 2011: 3683.
