珠江口盆地白云凹陷古近系恩平组源—汇系统动态恢复——来自地层正演模拟的启示
|
高建磊(1991-),男,山东东营人,中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院在读博士研究生,主要从事沉积过程定量模拟与实验研究。地址:山东省青岛市黄岛区长江西路66号,中国石油大学工科楼C座,邮政编码:266580。E-mail:Jianleigao@outlook.com |
Copy editor: 魏玮
收稿日期: 2025-10-04
修回日期: 2026-01-25
网络出版日期: 2026-01-14
基金资助
国家自然科学基金“特提斯构造域中东部典型前陆盆地形成演化机制与油气富集效应”(92055204)
中国科学院“智能导钻”A类先导项目(XDA14010401)
中国海洋石油集团有限公司“白云凹陷古近系油气富集规律及有利区带优选研究”(CCL2021SKPS0118)
Dynamic reconstruction of the source-to-sink system of the Paleogene Enping Formation in the Baiyun Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin, China: Insights from stratigraphic forward modeling
Received date: 2025-10-04
Revised date: 2026-01-25
Online published: 2026-01-14
鉴于传统源—汇体系分析方法难以表征深时多物源沉积过程及不同物源贡献的时空演化,以珠江口盆地白云凹陷古近系恩平组为例,基于地层正演模拟,提出一种多物源的源—汇系统动态定量分析方法。该方法利用模型内置的“时空物源标签”功能,为各物源沉积物赋予时间-物源标记,使不同来源的沉积贡献在模拟地层中留下可识别的“标签”,从而实现了各物源贡献的直接精准追踪与高时空分辨率定量分析。通过对珠江口盆地白云凹陷5口覆盖近源至远源的虚拟井进行分析,模拟结果量化展示了各物源在不同位置和不同时期的沉积贡献比例变化,并检验了方法的可操作性和精度。模拟得到的三维沉积分布与实测地层数据高度吻合,验证了模型的可靠性。模拟结果显示,恩平组沉积体系经历了显著的时空转换:恩平组沉积晚期以凹陷北部远端供砂为主导,沉积中心向北部深水区迁移,同时形成了向凹陷内部大规模进积的三角洲砂体。模拟的三维沉积体分布表明,白云凹陷深水相区可能广泛存在大范围分布的优质储层砂体,可作为未来勘探的关键目标。与传统静态分析方法相比,基于地层正演模拟的动态恢复显著提高了源—汇分析的时空分辨率,并定量揭示了沉积体系对构造活动、基准面升降等外部驱动因素的响应特征。该方法为复杂深时多物源体系的研究提供了全新的定量分析框架,有望为深水少井区的储层预测与油气勘探部署提供有效的技术支持。
高建磊 , 刘可禹 . 珠江口盆地白云凹陷古近系恩平组源—汇系统动态恢复——来自地层正演模拟的启示[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2026 , 53(1) : 130 -142 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.20250540
Traditional source-to-sink analyses cannot effectively characterize deep-time sedimentary processes involving multiple sediment sources and the spatiotemporal evolution of sediment contributions from different sources. In this study, a dynamic, quantitative source-to-sink analysis approach using stratigraphic forward modeling (SFM) is proposed, and it is applied to the Paleogene Enping Formation in the Baiyun Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin. The built-in spatiotemporal provenance tagging of the model assigns a unique time-source label to sediments from each provenance, making each source’s contribution identifiably “labeled” in the simulated formation, and thus enabling a direct precise tracking and high spatiotemporal resolution quantification of such contributions. Five pseudo-wells (from proximal to distal locations) in the Baiyun Sag were analyzed. The simulation results quantitatively represent the varied proportion of contribution of each source at different locations and in different periods and verify the proposed approach’s operability and accuracy of the proposed approach. The simulated 3D deposit distribution shows a high agreement with the measured stratigraphic data, validating the model’s reliability. Results reveal significant spatio-temporal changes in the Enping sedimentary system. In the late stage of Enping Formation deposition, a distal source supply from the northern part of the sag became dominant, the depocenter migrated northward to the deepwater area, and large-scale deltaic sand bodies extensively progradating into the sag were formed. The modeled 3D deposit distribution indicates that extensive high-quality reservoir sandstones are likely present across the deepwater area of the Baiyun Sag, which are identified as key exploration targets. Compared to traditional static approaches, the SFM-based dynamic simulation markedly enhances the spatiotemporal resolution of source-to-sink analysis and quantitatively captures the sedimentary system’s responses to tectonic activity, base-level fluctuations and other external drivers. The proposed approach provides a novel quantitative framework for investigating complex, deep-time, multi-source systems, and offers an effective tool for reservoir prediction and hydrocarbon exploration planning in under-explored deepwater areas.
| [1] |
温志新, 王建君, 王兆明, 等. 世界深水油气勘探形势分析与思考[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(5): 924-936.
|
| [2] |
张功成, 杨东升, 郭帅, 等. 基岩潜山三元主导油气成藏模式: 兼论南海北部深水区勘探新领域[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(12): 2045-2061.
|
| [3] |
谢玉洪. 南海北部陆缘盆地深水区油气勘探新认识及攻关方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(1): 13-25.
|
| [4] |
贾承造, 王祖纲, 姜林, 等. 中国油气勘探开发成就与未来潜力: 深层、深水与非常规油气: 专访中国科学院院士、石油地质与构造地质学家贾承造[J]. 世界石油工业, 2023, 30(3): 1-8.
|
| [5] |
唐武, 谢晓军, 熊连桥, 等. 陆架边缘三角洲-深水扇源汇耦合关系及成因机制: 以珠江口盆地白云南洼古近系珠海组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(3): 513-525.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
王策, 崔贺旗, 曾乐田, 等. 马尼拉海沟北部沉积物物源示踪: 来自碎屑锆石年代学的评估[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2023, 53(1): 41-54.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
刘可禹, 刘建良. 盆地沉积充填演化与含油气系统耦合模拟方法在超深层油气成藏模拟中的应用: 以四川盆地中部震旦系灯影组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1445-1458.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
卫哲, 向绪洪, 谢世文, 等. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷古近系源-汇系统耦合及时-空演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1927-1939.
|
| [25] |
张功成, 陈莹, 杨海长, 等. 恩平组岩性地层圈闭: 白云凹陷深水区天然气勘探新领域[J]. 中国海上油气, 2015, 27(6): 1-9.
|
| [26] |
米立军, 张忠涛, 庞雄, 等. 南海北部陆缘白云凹陷油气富集规律及主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5): 902-913.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
李成海, 王家豪, 柳保军, 等. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷古近系沉积相类型[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(6): 1162-1170.
|
| [30] |
曾智伟, 朱红涛, 杨香华, 等. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷恩平组物源转换及沉积充填演化[J]. 地球科学, 2017, 42(11): 1936-1954.
|
| [31] |
曾智伟, 杨香华, 朱红涛, 等. 白云凹陷恩平组沉积晚期大型三角洲发育特征及其意义[J]. 地球科学, 2017, 42(1): 78-92.
|
| [32] |
郭帅, 杨海长, 曾清波, 等. 白云凹陷恩平组南部物源研究及其油气地质意义[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2020, 36(6): 56-63.
|
| [33] |
韩银学, 陈莹, 杨海长, 等. 白云凹陷恩平组 “源-汇” 体系及其对油气勘探的影响[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(2): 25-34.
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
刘可禹, 高建磊, 刘建良. 一种源-汇系统定量评价方法: CN202111261444.7[P]. 2022-01-21.
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
高阳东, 朱伟林, 彭光荣, 等. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷烃源岩评价及油气资源分布预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(5): 986-996.
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |