石油勘探与开发 >

2022 , Vol. 49 >Issue 1: 183 - 193

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11698/PED.2022.01.17

石油工程

水平井压裂多裂缝扩展诱发光纤应变演化机理

  • 陈铭 ,
  • 郭天魁 ,
  • 胥云 ,
  • 曲占庆 ,
  • 张士诚 ,
  • 周彤 ,
  • 王云鹏
展开
  • 1.中国石油大学（华东）石油工程学院,山东青岛 266580;
    2.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083;
    3.中国石油大学（北京）石油工程学院,北京 102249;
    4.中国石化勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
陈铭（1990-）,男,山东泰安人,博士,中国石油大学（华东）师资博士后,主要从事压裂工艺理论与技术研究。地址：山东省青岛市黄岛区长江西路66号,中国石油大学（华东）石油工程学院,邮政编码：266580。E-mail: chenmingfrac@163.com

收稿日期: 2021-06-16

  修回日期: 2021-11-03

  网络出版日期: 2022-01-21

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年项目（52104060）; 山东省优秀青年基金项目（ZR2019QEE005）

收起

Evolution mechanism of optical fiber strain induced by multi-fracture growth during fracturing in horizontal wells

  • CHEN Ming ,
  • GUO Tiankui ,
  • XU Yun ,
  • QU Zhanqing ,
  • ZHANG Shicheng ,
  • ZHOU Tong ,
  • WANG Yunpeng
Expand
  • 1. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China;
    2. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
    4. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Sinopec, Beijing 100083, China

Received date: 2021-06-16

  Revised date: 2021-11-03

  Online published: 2022-01-21

Fold

摘要

在平面三维多裂缝扩展模型基础上,构建了压裂监测井光纤应变与应变率的计算模型,提出了水平井压裂多裂缝扩展诱发光纤应变正演计算方法。基于该方法,开展了水平井压裂多裂缝扩展诱发光纤应变与应变率数值模拟分析,结果表明,裂缝扩展诱发光纤应变演化可分为应变增强、收缩汇聚和直线状汇聚3个阶段;应变率演化可分为应变率增强、收缩汇聚、直线状汇聚、停泵应变率反转4个阶段。光纤应变停泵后不变,但应变率会出现反转,光纤应变率反转可反映注入动态;根据分布式光纤应变与应变率的直线状汇聚带,可判断裂缝扩展至光纤的时刻与井间压窜,同时可依据各簇裂缝扩展到光纤监测井的时刻识别多裂缝非均匀扩展现象,评价裂缝非均匀扩展程度;光纤监测井水平段位于裂缝高度范围内时,可识别裂缝延伸至光纤的时刻,而光纤监测井水平段位于裂缝高度以外时,汇聚条带不明显;多段压裂施工中,受上一压裂段应力干扰的影响,后续压裂段的光纤应变可能不再出现压裂初期的张应变区域,但光纤应变率动态可有效呈现每一段压裂裂缝的扩展动态,单段压裂的光纤应变率演化规律适用于多段压裂。

关键词： 水平井; 多段压裂; 光纤应变; 应变分布; 正演模型; 多裂缝扩展识别

本文引用格式

陈铭 , 郭天魁 , 胥云 , 曲占庆 , 张士诚 , 周彤 , 王云鹏 . 水平井压裂多裂缝扩展诱发光纤应变演化机理[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022 , 49(1) : 183 -193 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2022.01.17

Abstract

A forward model for optical fiber strain was established based on a planar 3D multi-fracture model. Then the forward method calculating distributed fiber strain induced by multi-fracture growth was proposed. Based on this method, fiber strain evolution during fracturing of horizontal well was numerically simulated. Fiber strain evolution induced by fracture growth can be divided into three stages: strain increasing, shrinkage convergence, and straight line convergence; whereas the evolution of fiber strain rate has four stages: strain rate increasing, shrinkage convergence, straight line convergence, and strain rate reversal after pumping stop. Fiber strain does not flip after pumping stop, while the strain rate flips after pumping stop, so strain rate can reflect injection dynamics. The time when the fracture extends to the fiber and inter-well pressure channeling can be identified by the straight line convergence band of distributed fiber strain or strain rate, and the non-uniform growth of multiple fractures can be evaluated by using the instants of fractures reaching the fiber monitoring well. When the horizontal section of the fiber monitoring well is within the height range of a hydraulic fracture, the instant of the fracture reaching the fiber can be identified, otherwise, the converging band is not obvious. In multi-stage fracturing, under the influence of stress shadow from previous fracturing stages, the tensile region of fiber strain may not appear, but the fiber strain rate can effectively show the fracture growth behavior in each stage. The evolution law of fiber strain rate in single-stage fracturing can be applied to multi-stage fracturing.

Key words： horizontal well; multi-stage fracturing; optical fiber strain; strain distribution; forward model; identification of multi-fracture growth

参考文献

[1] 雷群, 翁定为, 熊生春, 等. 中国石油页岩油储集层改造技术进展及发展方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(5): 1035-1042.
LEI Qun, WENG Dingwei, XIONG Shengchun, et al.Progress and development directions of shale oil stimulation technology of CNPC[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(5): 1035-1042.
[2] 李国欣, 覃建华, 鲜成钢, 等. 致密砾岩油田高效开发理论认识、关键技术与实践: 以准噶尔盆地玛湖油田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6): 1185-1197.
LI Guoxin, QIN Jianhua, XIAN Chenggang, et al.Theoretical understanding, key technologies and practices of tight conglomerate oilfield efficient development: A case study of the Mahu oilfield, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6): 1185-1197.
[3] 郭建春, 赵志红, 路千里, 等. 深层页岩缝网压裂关键力学理论研究进展[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 102-117.
GUO Jianchun, ZHAO Zhihong, LU Qianli, et al.Research progress in key mechanical theories of deep shale network fracturing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1): 102-117.
[4] 胥云, 雷群, 陈铭, 等. 体积改造技术理论研究进展与发展方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5): 874-887.
XU Yun, LEI Qun, CHEN Ming, et al.Progress and development of volume stimulation techniques[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5): 874-887.
[5] CIPPOLLA C L, WRIGHT C A.Diagnostic techniques to understand hydraulic fracturing: What? Why? And How?[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2002, 17(1): 23-35.
[6] MOLENAAR M M, HILL D J, WEBSTER P, et al.First downhole application of distributed acoustic sensing for hydraulic fracturing monitoring and diagnostics[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2012, 27(1): 32-38.
[7] CRAMER D, FRIEHAUF K, ROBERTS G, et al.Integrating distributed acoustic sensing, treatment-pressure analysis, and video-based perforation imaging to evaluate limited-entry-treatment effectiveness[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2020, 35(4): 0730-0755.
[8] 陈海潮, 唐有彩, 钮凤林, 等. 利用微地震参数评价水力压裂改造效果研究进展[J]. 石油科学通报, 2016, 1(2): 198-208.
CHEN Haichao, TANG Youcai, NIU Fenglin, et al.Recent advances in microseismic monitoring and its implication to hydraulic fracturing mapping[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2016, 1(2): 198-208.
[9] SCOTT E, YOUNG S, ELY J, et al.Lost in the shadows: Surviving fracturing hazards with fluid tracking[R]. SPE 199743, 2020.
[10] 隋微波, 刘荣全, 崔凯. 水力压裂分布式光纤声波传感监测的应用与研究进展[J]. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2021, 51(4): 371-387.
SUI Weibo, LIU Rongquan, CUI Kai.Application and research progress of distributed optical fiber acoustic sensing monitoring for hydraulic fracturing[J]. SCIENTIA SINICA Technologica, 2021, 51(4): 371-387.
[11] JIN G, ROY B.Hydraulic-fracture geometry characterization using low-frequency DAS signal[J]. The Leading Edge, 2017, 36(12): 975-980.
[12] UGUETO G A, TODEA F, DAREDIA T, et al.Can you feel the strain? DAS strain fronts for fracture geometry in the BC Montney, Groundbirch[R]. SPE 195943, 2020.
[13] RICHTER P, PARKER P, WOERPEL C, et al.Hydraulic fracture monitoring and optimization in unconventional completions using a high-resolution engineered fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensor[J]. First Break, 2019, 37(4): 63-68.
[14] ICHIKAWA M, KUROSAWA I, UCHIDA S, et al.Case study of hydraulic fracture monitoring using low-frequency components of DAS data[R]. SEG 3214251, 2019.
[15] LIU Y, WU K, JIN G, et al.Strain and strain-rate responses measured by LF-DAS and corresponding features for fracture-hit detection during multiple-fracture propagation in unconventional reservoirs[R]. URTeC 2948, 2020.
[16] LIU Y, WU K, JIN G, et al.Rock deformation and strain-rate characterization during hydraulic fracturing treatments: Insight for interpretation of low-frequency distributed acoustic-sensing signals[J]. SPE Journal, 2020, 25(5): 2251-2264.
[17] TAN Y H, WANG S G, RIJKEN P, et al.Geomechanical template for DAS fiber strain patterns during hydraulic fracturing[J]. SPE Journal, 2021, 26(2): 627-638.
[18] CRUMP J B, CONWAY M W.Effects of perforation-entry friction on bottom hole treating analysis[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1988, 40(8): 1041-1048.
[19] CHURCHILL S W.Friction-factor equation spans all fluid-flow regimes[J]. Chemical Engineering, 1977, 84(24): 91-92.
[20] ADACHI J, SIEBRITS E, PEIRCE A, et al.Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(5): 739-757.
[21] LECAMPION B, BUNGER A P, ZHANG X.Numerical methods for hydraulic fracture propagation: A review of recent trends[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2018, 49: 66-83.
[22] RATERMAN K T, FARRELL H E, MORA O S, et al.Sampling a stimulated rock volume: An Eagle Ford example[J]. SPE Journal, 2018, 21(4): 927-941.
[23] MCCLURE M, PICONE M, FOWLER G, et al.Nuances and frequently asked questions in field-scale hydraulic fracture modeling[R]. SPE 199726, 2020.
[24] CROUCH S L, STARFIELD A M.Boundary element methods in solid mechanics: With applications in rock mechanics and geological engineering[M]. New South Wales: Allen & Unwin, 1982.
[25] DETOURNAY E.Slickwater hydraulic fracturing of shales[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 886(F1): 1-4.
[26] 陈铭, 张士诚, 胥云, 等. 水平井分段压裂平面三维多裂缝扩展模型求解算法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1): 163-174.
CHEN Ming, ZHANG Shicheng, XU Yun, et al.A numerical method for simulating planar 3D multi-fracture propagation in multi-stage fracturing of horizontal wells[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 163-174.
[27] CHEN M, ZHANG S C, LI S H, et al. An explicit algorithm for modeling planar 3D hydraulic fracture growth based on a super-time-stepping method[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2020, 191/192: 370-389.
[28] LECAMPION B, PEIRCE A, DETOURNAY E.The impact of the near-tip logic on the accuracy and convergence rate of hydraulic fracture simulations compared to reference solutions[R]. Brisbane: The International Conference for Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing, 2013.
[29] SNEDDON I N, ELLIOT H A.The opening of a Griffith crack under internal pressure[J]. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 1946, 4(3): 262-267.
[30] 杨潇, 张广清, 刘志斌, 等. 压裂过程中水力裂缝动态宽度实验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(9): 2232-2237.
YANG Xiao, ZHANG Guangqing, LIU Zhibin, et al.Experimental research on the variation of fracture width in hydraulic fracturing process[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(9): 2232-2237.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

版权所有：《石油勘探与开发》编辑部；《石油勘探与开发（英文）》编辑部
地址：北京市海淀区学院路20号，中国石油勘探开发研究院数据中心605室　

京ICP备15044687号    技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司