石油勘探与开发 >

2021 , Vol. 48 >Issue 6: 1218 - 1223

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11698/PED.2021.06.13

油气田开发

化学复合驱“二三结合”油藏产量计算方法

  • 刘卫东 ,
  • 王高峰 ,
  • 廖广志 ,
  • 王红庄 ,
  • 王正茂 ,
  • 王强 ,
  • 王正波
展开
  • 1.提高采收率国家重点实验室,北京 100083;
    2.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083;
    3.中国石油勘探与生产分公司,北京 100007
刘卫东（1970-）,男,博士,河北唐山人,中国石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师,主要从事油田化学剂研发、化学驱提高采收率等方面的研究。地址：北京市海淀区学院路20号,中国石油勘探开发研究院油田化学研究所,邮政编码：100083。E-mail: lwd69@petrochina.com.cn

收稿日期: 2020-12-04

  修回日期: 2021-09-15

  网络出版日期: 2021-11-25

基金资助

国家科技重大专项“化学驱提高采收率技术”（2016ZX05010）

收起

Production calculation of the second & tertiary recovery combination reservoirs under chemical flooding

  • LIU Weidong ,
  • WANG Gaofeng ,
  • LIAO Guangzhi ,
  • WANG Hongzhuang ,
  • WANG Zhengmao ,
  • WANG Qiang ,
  • WANG Zhengbo
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. PetroChina Exploration & Production Company, Beijing 100007, China

Received date: 2020-12-04

  Revised date: 2021-09-15

  Online published: 2021-11-25

Fold

摘要

在剖析“二三结合”项目产量构成的基础上,提出了化学复合驱“二三结合”项目整体产量与空白水驱阶段产量的关系;根据“采收率等于波及系数乘以驱油效率”油藏工程原理,推导了化学复合驱油藏采收率计算公式;采用微分法对油藏进行剖分,建立了剖分网格采收率和油藏采出程度之间的联系,进而明确了化学复合驱油藏产量变化规律,定义了化学复合驱增产倍数,结合油田开发实际提出了化学复合驱“二三结合”油藏产量计算方法。研究表明：化学复合驱增产效果随化学复合驱和水驱驱油效率之比的升高而均匀升高,随转驱时采出程度和水驱油效率之比的增加而迅速增加,在高采出程度油藏实施化学复合驱更有利于提高增油效果。经实际二元驱试验检验,化学复合驱“二三结合”油藏产量计算方法预测结果相对误差约为±10%,预测精度满足油藏工程要求。图3表2参31

关键词： 化学复合驱; 二三结合项目; 驱油效率; 化学驱增产倍数; 产量计算

本文引用格式

刘卫东 , 王高峰 , 廖广志 , 王红庄 , 王正茂 , 王强 , 王正波 . 化学复合驱“二三结合”油藏产量计算方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021 , 48(6) : 1218 -1223 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2021.06.13

Abstract

Based on the analysis of the production composition of reservoirs developed by the second & tertiary recovery combination (STRC), the relationship between the overall output of the STRC project and the production level during the blank water flooding stage is proposed. According to the basic principle of reservoir engineering that the “recovery factor is equal to sweeping coefficient multiplied by oil displacement efficiency”, the formula for calculating the ultimate oil recovery factor of chemical combination flooding reservoir was established. By dividing the reservoir into a series of grids according to differential calculus thinking, the relationship between the ultimate recovery factor of a certain number of grids and the recovery degree of the reservoir was established, and then the variation law of oil production rate of the STRC reservoir was obtained. The concept of “oil rate enlargement factor of chemical combination flooding” was defined, and a production calculation method of reservoir developed by STRC was put forward based on practical oilfield development experience. The study shows that the oil production enhancing effect of STRC increases evenly with the increase of the ratio of STRC displacement efficiency to water displacement efficiency, and increases rapidly with the increase of the ratio of recovery degree at flooding mode conversion to the water displacement efficiency. STRC is more effective in increasing oil production of reservoir with high recovery degree. Through practical tests of the alkali free binary flooding (polymer/surfactant) projects, the relative error of the oil production calculation method of STRC reservoir is about ±10%, which meets the requirements of reservoir engineering.

Key words： chemical combination flooding; second &tertiary recovery combination; oil displacement efficiency; oil rate enlargement factor of chemical flooding; oil production calculation

参考文献

[1] 程杰成, 廖广志, 杨振宇, 等. 大庆油田三元复合驱矿场试验综述[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2001, 20(2): 46-49.
CHENG Jiecheng, LIAO Guangzhi, YANG Zhenyu, et al. Pilot test of ASP flooding in Daqing oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2001, 20(2): 46-49.
[2] 袁士义, 王强. 中国油田开发主体技术新进展与展望[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4): 657-668.
YUAN Shiyi, WANG Qiang. New progress and prospect of oilfields development technologies in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4): 657-668.
[3] 高晶霞. “二三结合”试验集输建设方案优化[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2007, 26(4): 17.
GAO Jingxia. Construction scheme optimization of gathering and transportation for the second & tertiary combination mode[J]. Oil-Gasfield Surface Engineering, 2007, 26(4): 17.
[4] 廖广志, 王强, 王红庄, 等. 化学驱开发现状与前景展望[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(2): 176-207.
LIAO Guangzhi, WANG Qiang, WANG Hongzhuang, et al. Chemical flooding development status and prospect[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(2): 176-207.
[5] 刘义坤, 文华, 隋新光. 萨中开发区“二三结合”开发实验数值模拟[J]. 大庆石油学院学报, 2007, 31(6): 36-39.
LIU Yikun, WEN Hua, SUI Xinguang. Numerical simulation of second tertiary combined development test in Sazhong development area[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Istitute, 2007, 31(6): 36-39.
[6] BERNARD G G. Effect of floodwater salinity on recovery of oil from cores containing clays[R]. SPE 1725, 1967.
[7] 程杰成, 吴军政, 胡俊卿. 三元复合驱提高原油采收率关键理论与技术[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(2): 310-318.
CHENG Jiecheng, WU Junzheng, HU Junqing. Key theories and technologies for enhanced oil recovery of alkaline/surfactant/polymer flooding[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(2): 310-318.
[8] 朱友益, 张翼, 牛佳玲, 等. 无碱表面活性剂-聚合物复合驱技术研究进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(3): 346-351.
ZHU Youyi, ZHANG Yi, NIU Jialing, et al. The progress in the alkali-free surfactant-polymer combination flooding techniquet[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3): 346-351.
[9] 孙焕泉. 二元复合驱油体系配方研究及矿场应用[R]. 北京: 中国石油学会三次采油技术研讨会, 2006.
SUN Huanquan. Study on the formulation of binary compound flooding system and its field application[R]. Beijing: The Technical Seminar on Tertiary Oil Recovery of CPS, 2006.
[10] 刘卫东, 罗莉涛, 廖广志, 等. 聚合物-表面活性剂二元驱提高采收率机理实验[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(4): 600-607.
LIU Weidong, LUO Litao, LIAO Guangzhi, et al. Experimental study on the mechanism of enhancing oil recovery by polymer-surfactant binary flooding[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(4): 600-607.
[11] 刘哲宇, 李宜强, 冷润熙, 等. 孔隙结构对砾岩油藏聚表二元复合驱提高采收率的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1): 129-139.
LIU Zheyu, LI Yiqiang, LENG Runxi, et al. Effect of pore structure on surfactant/polymer flooding-based enhanced oil recovery in conglomerate reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 129-139.
[12] 王刚, 王德民, 夏惠芬, 等. 聚合物驱后用甜菜碱型表面活性剂提高驱油效率机理研究[J]. 石油学报, 2007, 28(4): 86-90.
WANG Gang, WANG Demin, XIA Huifen, et al. Mechanism for enhanceing oil displacement efficiency with betaine surfactant after polymer flooding[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(4): 86-90.
[13] 卢祥国, 曹豹, 谢坤, 等. 非均质油藏聚合物驱提高采收率机理再认识[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(1): 148-155.
LU Xiangguo, CAO Bao, XIE Kun, et al. EOR mechanisms of polymer flooding in a heterogeneous oil reservoir[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1): 148-155.
[14] 范海娇, 杨二龙. 二三结合模式下水驱与化学驱配产配注优化[J].石油化工高等学校学报, 2019, 32(5): 90-95.
FAN Haijiao, YANG Erlong. Optimization of production and injection rate of water flooding and chemical flooding in second tertiary development mode[J]. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2019, 32(5): 90-95.
[15] 王强, 高明, 刘朝霞, 等. 化学驱提高采收率潜力评价方法研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2017, 40(1): 41-43.
WANG Qiang, GAO Ming, LIU Zhaoxia, et al. Evaluation study on EOR potential of chemical flooding[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2017, 40(1): 41-43.
[16] 张新英. 胜利油田化学驱增油量预测方法[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2012, 33(5): 584-585.
ZHANG Xinying. Prediction methods for incremental oil by chemical flooding process in Shengli oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2012, 33(5): 584-585.
[17] 张舒琴. 化学驱合理配产配注方法研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2020, 34(2): 119-122.
ZHANG Shuqin. Reasonable production and injection allocation methods of chemical flooding[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2020, 34(2): 119-122.
[18] 王高峰, 张志升, 杨承伟, 等. 改质水驱砂岩油藏生产动态预测方法[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2020, 34(2): 66-70.
WANG Gaofeng, ZHANG Zhisheng, YANG Chengwei, et al. Prediction method of production performance of modified water drive in sandstone reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2020, 34(2): 66-70.
[19] 韩大匡. 深度开发高含水油田提高采收率问题的探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1995, 22(5): 47-55.
HAN Dakuang. An approach to deep development of high water-cut oilfield to improve oil recovery[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1995, 22(5): 47-55.
[20] 陈元千. 水驱体积波及系数变化关系的研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2001, 8(6): 49-51.
CHEN Yuanqian. A study on the changing relation of the water flooding volumetric sweep factor[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery efficiency, 2001, 8(6): 49-51.
[21] 王博, 左松林, 刘浪, 等. 预测水驱油田体积波及系数的新方法[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2011, 32(4): 387-389.
WANG Bo, ZUO Songlin, LIU Lang, et al. A new method for prediction volumetric sweep efficiency of water-drive oilfields[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2011, 32(4): 387-389.
[22] 窦宏恩, 张虎俊, 沈思博. 对水驱特征曲线的正确理解与使用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(4): 755-762.
DOU Hongen, ZHANG Hujun, SHEN Sibo. Correct understanding and application of waterflooding characteristic curve[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(4): 755-762.
[23] 元福卿, 李振泉. 胜利油田化学驱扩大水驱波及系数预测方法研究[J]. 重庆科技学院学报, 2014, 16(2): 43-46.
YUAN Fuqing, LI Zhenquan. A prediction method of expanding water flooding sweep coefficient by chemical flooding in Shengli oilfield[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology, 2014, 16(2): 43-46.
[24] HABERMANN B. The efficiencies of miscible displacement as a function of mobility ratio[J]. Transactions of the AIME, 1960, 219(1): 264-272.
[25] 王强, 计秉玉, 聂俊. 聚合物驱油过程中不同粘度比情况下波及系数计算方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(4): 551-555.
WANG Qiang, JI Bingyu, NIE Jun. Calculation methods of sweep efficiency under different viscosity ratio for polymer flooding process[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(4): 551-555.
[26] 李宜强. 聚合物驱大平面模型物理模拟实验研究[D]. 廊坊: 中国科学院研究生院(渗流流体力学研究所), 2006.
LI Yiqiang. Experimental study of physical simulation on polymer flooding in the large-scale areal model[D]. Langfang: Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Porous Flow & Fluid Mechanics), 2006.
[27] 杨清彦, 李斌会, 李宜强, 等. 聚合物驱波及系数和驱油效率的计算方法研究[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2007, 26(1): 109-112.
YANG Qingyan, LI Binhui, LI Yiqiang, et al. Calculation method research on sweep efficiency and displacement efficiency in polymer flooding[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2007, 26(1): 109-112.
[28] 郭兰磊. 聚驱后油藏化学驱提高采收率技术及先导试验[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2014, 33(1): 122-126.
GUO Lanlei. Chemical EOR technique and pilot test for the oil reservoirs after polymer flooded[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2014, 33(1): 122-126.
[29] 于倩男, 刘义坤, 梁爽, 等. 聚表剂驱提高采收率机理实验: 以大庆长垣油田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(6): 1138-1147.
YU Qiannan, LIU Yikun, LIANG Shuang, et al. Experimental study on surface-active polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery: A case study of Daqing placanticline oilfield, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(6): 1138-1147.
[30] 陈小龙, 李宜强, 廖广志, 等. 减氧空气重力稳定驱驱替机理及与采收率的关系[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(4): 780-788.
CHEN Xiaolong, LI Yiqiang, LIAO Guangzhi, et al. Experimental investigation on stable displacement mechanism and oil recovery enhancement of oxygen-reduced air assisted gravity drainage[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(4): 780-788.
[31] 雷群, 罗健辉, 彭宝亮, 等. 纳米驱油剂扩大水驱波及体积机理[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(5): 937-942.
LEI Qun, LUO Jianhui, PENG Baoliang, et al. Mechanism of expanding swept volume by nano-sized oil-displacement agent[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(5): 937-942.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

版权所有：《石油勘探与开发》编辑部；《石油勘探与开发（英文）》编辑部
地址：北京市海淀区学院路20号，中国石油勘探开发研究院数据中心605室　

京ICP备15044687号    技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司