针对窄细古河道精细刻画难题,利用最大熵准则增强Wigner-Ville分布的聚焦特性,在有效提升地震信号时频分辨能力的基础上,建立了一种微型古河道识别新方法。基于最大熵功率谱与自回归模型(AR)功率谱等效的原理,首先利用Burg算法和Levinson-Durbin递推规则,求取AR模型的预测误差、自回归系数等参数;然后,在自相关函数一阶导数为0的条件下,计算地震信号的Wigner-Ville分布,获取微型古河道最大熵准则约束下的Wigner-Ville时频功率谱(MEWVD)。通过仿真地震信号和窄薄模型数值模拟信号实验分析,发现MEWVD既能有效避免Wigner-Ville分布的交叉项干扰,还能获得比短时傅里叶变换(STFT)、连续小波变换(CWT)等信号分析方法更加精准的频谱特征;同时,还证实了利用不同频率的MEWVD,可以有效识别不同尺度的窄细古河道。将该方法应用于四川盆地中江气田侏罗系沙溪庙组(J2s33-2小层)气藏,准确地识别出宽度小于500 m、砂岩厚度小于35 m的窄细古河道的宽度、走向等空间信息,可为井位部署、水平井压裂选段等提供依据。图7表2参31
[1] 刘成川, 曹廷宽, 卜淘. 薄窄河道致密砂岩气藏高效开发技术对策[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 39(2): 157-165.
LIU Chengchuan, CAO Tingkuan, BU Tao. High-efficiency developing techniques for the tight sandstone gas reservoir with thin and narrow channels[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2020, 39(2): 157-165.
[2] 梁宏刚, 先伟, 李文平. 塔河油田超深层、薄储层、窄河道砂体识别与描述技术[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015, 34(5): 180-183.
LIANG Honggang, XIAN Wei, LI Wenping. Identification and description technique for ultra-deep, thin reservoir, narrow, channel sand, Tahe oil field[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015, 34(5): 180-183.
[3] WANG Y. Inverse Q-filter for seismic resolution enhancement[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(3): 51-60.
[4] 李胜强, 刘振东, 严加永, 等. 高分辨深反射地震探测采集处理关键技术综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2020, 35(4): 1400-1409.
LI Shengqiang, LIU Zhendong, YAN Jiayong, et al. Review on the key techniques for high resolution deep reflection seismic acquisition and processing[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2020, 35(4): 1400-1409.
[5] MICHAL S, GARY P, JAIME S, et al. Extending seismic bandwidth using the continuous wavelet transform[J]. First Brieak, 2008, 26(6): 97-102.
[6] CHOPRA S, CASTAGNA J P, XU Y. Thin-bed reflectivity inversion and some applications[J]. First Break, 2009, 27(5): 27-34.
[7] SUN H Y, DEMANET L. Low-frequency extrapolation with deep learning[R]. Anaheim: 88th Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and Annual Meeting, 2018.
[8] 李祺鑫, 罗亚能, 张生, 等. 高分辨率波阻抗贝叶斯序贯随机反演[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2020, 55(2): 389-398.
LI Qixin, LUO Yaneng, ZHANG Sheng, et al. High-resolution Bayesian sequential stochastic inversion[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospection, 2020, 55(2): 389-398.
[9] 陈彦虎, 毕建军, 邱小斌, 等. 地震波形指示反演方法及其应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6): 1149-1158.
CHEN Yanhu, BI Jianjun, QIU Xiaobin, et al. A method of seismic meme inversion and its application[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6): 1149-1158.
[10] GABOR D. Theory of communication[J]. Journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, 1946, 93(26): 429-457.
[11] 黄昱丞, 郑晓东, 栾奕, 等. 地震信号线性与非线性时频分析方法对比[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2018, 53(5): 975-989.
HUANG Yucheng, ZHENG Xiaodong, LUAN Yi, et al. Comparison of linear and nonlinear time-frequecy analysis on seismic signals[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospection, 2018, 53(5): 975-989.
[12] WAERDEN B L van der. Sources of quantum mechanics[M]. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 1967.
[13] PEI S C, HUANG S G. STFT with adaptive window width based on the chirp rate[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2012, 60(8): 4065-4080.
[14] HUANG N E, SHEN Z, LONG S R, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis[J]. Proceedings Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sciences, 1998, 454(1971): 903-995.
[15] TORRES M E, COLOMINAS M A, SCHLOTTHAUER G, et al. A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise[R]. Prague: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, 2011.
[16] DAUBECHIES I, LU J, WU H T. Synchrosqueezed wavelet transforms: An empirical mode decomposition-like tool[J]. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 2011, 30(2): 243-261.
[17] MALLAT S G, ZHANG Z F. Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries[J]. IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing, 1993, 41(12): 3397-3415.
[18] WIGNER E P. On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium[J]. Physical Review, 1932, 40(5): 749-759.
[19] CHOI H I, WILLIAMS W J. Improved time-frequency representation of multicomponent signals using exponential kernels[J]. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech & Signal Processing, 2002, 37(6): 862-871.
[20] SHANNON C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J]. Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 1948, 5(1): 3-55.
[21] JAYNES E T. Information theory and statistical mechanicsⅡ[J]. Physical Review, 1957, 108(2): 171-190.
[22] BURG J P. A new analysis technique for time series data[R]. Enschede, the Netherlands: NATO Advanced Study Institute on Signal Processing with Emphasis on Underwater Acoustics, 1968.
[23] BOASHASH B. Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal: Part I: Fundamentals[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1992, 80(4): 520-538.
[24] BOS A V D. Alternative interpretation of maximum entropy spectral analysis[J]. IEEE Trans on Information Theory, 1971, 17(4): 493-494.
[25] LEVINSON N. The Wiener RMS (root mean square) criterion in filter design and prediction[J]. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 1946, 25(1/2/3/4): 261-278.
[26] KAY S M, MARPLE S L. Spectrum analysis a modern perspective[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1981, 68(11): 1380-1419.
[27] MARPLE S L. A new autoregressive spectrum analysis algorithm[J]. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1980, 28(4): 441-454.
[28] BURG J P. Maximum entropy spectrum analysis[D]. Stanford, California: Stanford University, 1975.
[29] 谢林江, 尹东. 基于最大相关熵准则的鲁棒度量学习算法[J]. 计算机系统应用, 2018, 27(10): 146-153.
XIE Linjiang, YIN Dong. Robust metric learning based on maximum correntropy criterion[J]. Computer Systems & Applications, 2018, 27(10): 146-153.
[30] 马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣, 等. 四川盆地大中型天然气田分布特征与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(1): 347-354.
MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, ZHAO Peirong, et al. Distribution and further exploration of the large-medium sized gas fields in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(1): 347-354.
[31] 魏国齐, 杨威, 刘满仓, 等. 四川盆地大气田分布、主控因素与勘探方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(6): 1-12.
WEI Guoqi, YANG Wei, LIU Mancang, et al. Distribution rules, main controlling factors and exploration directions of giant gas fields in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(6): 1-12.