石油勘探与开发 >

2021 , Vol. 48 >Issue 6: 1089 - 1099

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11698/PED.2021.06.02

油气勘探

四川盆地震旦系气源特征与原生含气系统有效性

  • 赵文智 ,
  • 谢增业 ,
  • 王晓梅 ,
  • 沈安江 ,
  • 魏国齐 ,
  • 汪泽成 ,
  • 王坤
展开
  • 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083;
    2.中国石油大学（北京）地球科学学院,北京 102249;
    3.中国石油天然气集团有限公司天然气成藏与开发重点实验室,河北廊坊 065007;
    4.中国石油杭州地质研究院,杭州 310023
赵文智（1958-）,男,河北昌黎人,博士,中国石油勘探开发研究院教授级高级工程师,中国工程院院士,主要从事石油天然气地质综合研究和科研管理工作。地址：北京市海淀区学院路20号,中国石油勘探开发研究院,邮政编码：100083。E-mail: zwz@petrochina.com.cn

收稿日期: 2021-06-10

  修回日期: 2021-09-08

  网络出版日期: 2021-11-25

基金资助

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项（A类）（XDA14010403）; 国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05004,2016ZX05007-003）; 中国石油天然气股份有限公司科学研究与技术开发项目（kt2020-01-03）; 中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技项目“大气田（区）成藏规律与勘探关键技术研究（2021DJ0604）”

收起

Sinian gas sources and effectiveness of primary gas-bearing system in Sichuan Basin, SW China

  • ZHAO Wenzhi ,
  • XIE Zengye ,
  • WANG Xiaomei ,
  • SHEN Anjiang ,
  • WEI Guoqi ,
  • WANG Zecheng ,
  • WANG Kun
Expand
  • 1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Gas Reservoir Formation and Development, CNPC, Langfang 065007, China;
    4. Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology (HIPG), PetroChina, Hangzhou 310023, China

Received date: 2021-06-10

  Revised date: 2021-09-08

  Online published: 2021-11-25

Fold

摘要

基于震旦系和寒武系烃源岩地球化学特征及与已发现气藏对比关系,辅以成藏条件分析,探讨震旦系天然气来源,明确了震旦系烃源岩的成藏贡献及原生含气系统有效性。通过天然气组成、碳氢同位素及震旦系成藏组合有效性分析,认为：①震旦系原生天然气具有低乙烷含量、重乙烷碳同位素组成和轻甲烷氢同位素组成3个特点,明显不同于寒武系;②震旦系气藏是震旦系与寒武系双源形成的混源气藏,震旦系贡献比例在灯影组四段与灯影组二段不同,位于灯影组四段台缘带和台内的贡献比分别为39%和55%,位于灯影组二段台缘带和台内的贡献比分别为54%和68%;③震旦系原生含气系统的有效性取决于源灶生气有效性、储集层有效性与成藏要素组合有效性。高过成熟海相层系天然气来源除液态烃热裂解成气外,Ro<3.5%的区域,烃源岩干酪根仍具有一定的热降解生气潜力。震旦系微生物白云岩在深层环境仍发育规模优质储集层,且在川中古隆起范围内与其他成藏要素形成时空匹配,增加了震旦系原生含气系统存在的可能性。研究成果证实震旦系原生含气系统具有规模成藏的现实性。图6参53

关键词： 天然气; 碳同位素组成; 氢同位素组成; 地球化学特征; 气源对比; 震旦系; 原生含气系统; 四川盆地

本文引用格式

赵文智 , 谢增业 , 王晓梅 , 沈安江 , 魏国齐 , 汪泽成 , 王坤 . 四川盆地震旦系气源特征与原生含气系统有效性[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021 , 48(6) : 1089 -1099 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2021.06.02

Abstract

Based on correlation between geochemical characteristics of Sinian and Cambrian source rocks and discovered gas reservoirs, and the analysis on geological conditions of reservoir formation, the sources of natural gas in the Sinian of Sichuan Basin have been discussed to sort out the contribution of Sinian source rocks to the gas reservoirs and effectiveness of Sinian primary gas-bearing system. Through the analysis of natural gas composition, carbon and hydrogen isotopes and effectiveness of Sinian accumulation assemblages, it is concluded that: (1) The natural gas derived from the Sinian source rock is characterized by low ethane content, heavy ethane carbon isotope and light methane hydrogen isotope, and obviously different from the gas generated by the Cambrian source rock. (2) The gas reservoirs discovered in Sinian Dengying Formation are sourced by Sinian and Cambrian source rocks, and the Sinian source rock contributes different proportions to the gas in the 4th member and the 2nd member of the Dengying Formation, specifically, 39% and 55% to the 4th member in marginal zone and intra-platform, 54% and 68% to the 2th member in the marginal zone and intra-platform respectively. (3) The effectiveness of the Sinian primary gas-bearing system depends on the gas generating effectiveness of the source kitchen, reservoir and combination of gas accumulation elements. For high-over mature marine source rocks at the Ro of less than 3.5%, besides gas generated from the thermal cracking of liquid hydrocarbon, the kerogen still has some gas generation potential by thermal degradation. In addition, the Sinian microbial dolomite still preserves relatively good-quality reservoirs despite large burial depths, which match well with other basic conditions for gas accumulation in central Sichuan paleo-uplift, increasing the possibility of Sinian primary gas-bearing system. The research results confirm that the Sinian primary gas-bearing system is likely to form large-scale accumulation.

Key words： natural gas; carbon isotope; hydrogen isotope; geochemical characteristics; gas and source rock correlation; Sinian System; primary gas-bearing system; Sichuan Basin

参考文献

[1] 邹才能, 杜金虎, 徐春春, 等. 四川盆地震旦系—寒武系特大型气田形成分布、资源潜力及勘探发现[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(3): 278-293.
ZOU Caineng, DU Jinhu, XU Chunchun, et al. Formation, distribution, resource potential and discovery of the Sinian-Cambrian giant gas field, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3): 278-293.
[2] 徐春春, 沈平, 杨跃明, 等. 乐山-龙女寺古隆起震旦系-下寒武统龙王庙组天然气成藏条件与富集规律[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(3): 1-7.
XU Chunchun, SHEN Ping, YANG Yueming, et al. Accumulation conditions and enrichment patterns of natural gas in the Lower Cambrian Longwangmiao Fm reservoirs of the Leshan-Longnüsi Paleohigh, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(3): 1-7.
[3] 魏国齐, 杜金虎, 徐春春, 等. 四川盆地高石梯-磨溪地区震旦系-寒武系大型气藏特征与聚集模式[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(1): 1-12.
WEI Guoqi, DU Jinhu, XU Chunchun, et al. Characteristics and accumulation modes of large gas reservoirs in Sinian-Cambrian of Gaoshiti-Moxi region, Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(1): 1-12.
[4] 杨跃明, 杨雨, 杨光, 等. 安岳气田震旦系、寒武系气藏成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(4): 493-508.
YANG Yueming, YANG Yu, YANG Guang, et al. Gas accumulation conditions and key exploration & development technologies of Sinian and Cambrian gas reservoirs in Anyue gas field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(4): 493-508.
[5] 马新华, 杨雨, 文龙, 等. 四川盆地海相碳酸盐岩大中型气田分布规律及勘探方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(1): 1-13.
MA Xinhua, YANG Yu, WEN Long, et al. Distribution and exploration direction of medium- and large-sized marine carbonate gas fields in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(1): 1-13.
[6] 赵文智, 汪泽成, 姜华, 等. 从古老碳酸盐岩大油气田形成条件看四川盆地深层震旦系的勘探地位[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(2): 1-10.
ZHAO Wenzhi, WANG Zecheng, JIANG Hua, et al. Exploration status of the deep Sinian strata in the Sichuan Basin: Formation conditions of old giant carbonate oil/gas fields[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(2): 1-10.
[7] 帅燕华, 张水昌, 胡国艺, 等. 四川盆地高石梯—磨溪地区震旦系—寒武系天然气TSR效应及气源启示[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(7): 1754-1766.
SHUAI Yanhua, ZHANG Shuichang, HU Guoyi, et al. Thermochemical sulphate reduction of Sinian and Cambrian natural gases in the Gaoshiti-Moxi area, Sichuan Basin, and its enlightment for gas sources[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(7): 1754-1766.
[8] 周国晓, 秦胜飞, 侯曜华, 等. 四川盆地安岳气田龙王庙组气藏天然气有水溶气贡献的迹象[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(12): 2193-2199.
ZHOU Guoxiao, QIN Shengfei, HOU Yaohua, et al. The evidence of water soluble gas contribution to gas reservoir of Longwangmiao Formation in Anyue Gasfield, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(12): 2193-2199.
[9] 郑平, 施雨华, 邹春艳, 等. 高石梯-磨溪地区灯影组、龙王庙组天然气气源分析[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(3): 50-54.
ZHENG Ping, SHI Yuhua, ZOU Chunyan, et al. Natural gas sources in the Dengying and Longwangmiao Fms in the Gaoshiti-Maoxi area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(3): 50-54.
[10] 魏国齐, 谢增业, 宋家荣, 等. 四川盆地川中古隆起震旦系-寒武系天然气特征及成因[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(6): 702-711.
WEI Guoqi, XIE Zengye, SONG Jiarong, et al. Features and origin of natural gas in the Sinian-Cambrian of central Sichuan paleo-uplift, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(6): 702-711.
[11] 魏国齐, 沈平, 杨威, 等. 四川盆地震旦系大气田形成条件与勘探远景区[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(2): 129-138.
WEI Guoqi, SHEN Ping, YANG Wei, et al. Formation conditions and exploration prospects of Sinian large gas fields, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(2): 129-138.
[12] 夏茂龙, 文龙, 陈文, 等. 高石梯-磨溪地区震旦系灯影组、寒武系龙王庙组烃源与成藏演化特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(增刊1): 1-6.
XIA Maolong, WEN Long, CHEN Wen, et al. Sinian system Dengying Formation and Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation hydrocarbon source and accumulation evolution characteristics in Gaoshiti-Moxi area[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(S1): 1-6.
[13] 赵路子, 汪泽成, 杨雨, 等. 四川盆地蓬探1井灯影组灯二段油气勘探重大发现及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3): 1-12.
ZHAO Luzi, WANG Zecheng, YANG Yu, et al. Important discovery in the second member of Dengying Formation in Well Pengtan1 and its significance, Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(3): 1-12.
[14] 乐宏, 赵路子, 杨雨, 等. 四川盆地寒武系沧浪铺组油气勘探重大发现及其启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(11): 11-19.
YUE Hong, ZHAO Luzi, YANG Yu, et al. Great discovery of oil and gas exploration in Cambrian Canglangpu Formation of the Sichuan Basin and its implications[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(11): 11-19.
[15] 赵文智, 王晓梅, 胡素云, 等. 中国元古宇烃源岩成烃特征及勘探前景[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2019, 49(6): 939-964.
ZHAO Wenzhi, WANG Xiaomei, HU Suyun, et al. Hydrocarbon generation characteristics and exploration prospects of Proterozoic source rocks in China[J]. SCIENCE CHINA Earth Sciences, 2019, 62(6): 909-934.
[16] 赵文智, 胡素云, 汪泽成, 等. 中国元古界-寒武系油气地质条件与勘探地位[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(1): 1-13.
ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, WANG Zecheng, et al. Petroleum geological conditions and exploration importance of Proterozoic to Cambrian in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(1): 1-13.
[17] 谢增业, 田世澄, 李剑, 等. 川东北飞仙关组鲕滩天然气地球化学特征与成因[J]. 地球化学, 2004, 33(6): 567-573.
XIE Zengye, TIAN Shicheng, LI Jian, et al. Geochemical characteristics and origin of Feixianguan Formation oolitic shoal natural gases in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Geochimica, 2004, 33(6): 567-573.
[18] 朱光有, 张水昌, 梁英波, 等. 川东北地区飞仙关组高含H2S天然气TSR成因的同位素证据[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2005, 35(11): 1037-1046.
ZHU Guangyou, ZHANG Shuichang, LIANG Yingbo, et al. Isotopic evidence of TSR origin for natural gas bearing high H2S contents within the Feixianguan Formation of the northeastern Sichuan Basin, southwestern China[J]. SCIENCE CHINA Earth Sciences, 2005, 48(11): 1960-1971.
[19] LIU Quanyou, WORDEN R H, JIN Zhijun, et al. TSR versus non-TSR processes and their impact on gas geochemistry and carbon stable isotopes in Carboniferous, Permian and Lower Triassic marine carbonate gas reservoirs in the Eastern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2013, 100(1): 96-115.
[20] 魏国齐, 王东良, 王晓波, 等. 四川盆地高石梯-磨溪大气田稀有气体特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(5): 533-538.
WEI Guoqi, WANG Dongliang, WANG Xiaobo, et al. Characteristics of noble gases in the large Gaoshiti-Moxi gas field in Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(5): 533-538.
[21] 吴伟, 罗超, 张鉴, 等. 油型气乙烷碳同位素演化规律与成因[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(12): 1463-1471.
WU Wei, LUO Chao, ZHANG Jian, et al. Evolution law and genesis of ethane carbon isotope of oil type gas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(12): 1463-1471.
[22] 李友川, 孙玉梅, 兰蕾. 用乙烷碳同位素判别天然气成因类型存在问题探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(4): 654-664.
LI Youchuan, SUN Yumei, LAN Lei.Discussion on the recognition of gas origin by using ethane carbon isotope[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(4): 654-664.
[23] 王铜山, 耿安松, 熊永强, 等. 塔里木盆地海相原油及其沥青质裂解生气动力学模拟研究[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(2): 167-172.
WANG Tongshan, GENG Ansong, XIONG Yongqiang, et al. Kinetic simulation study on generation of gaseous hydrocarbons from the pyrolysis of marine crude oil and its asphaltene in Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2008, 29(2): 167-172.
[24] XIE Zengye, LI Jian, LI Zhisheng, et al. Geochemical characteristics of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin, China and its sgnificance for hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 2017, 91(5): 1836-1854.
[25] NI Yunyan, LIAO Fengrong, GAO Jinliang, et al. Hydrogen isotopes of hydrocarbon gases from different organic facies of the Zhongba gas field, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 176(8): 776-786.
[26] 黄士鹏, 段书府, 汪泽成, 等. 烷烃气稳定氢同位素组成影响因素及应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(3): 496-508.
HUANG Shipeng, DUAN Shufu, WANG Zecheng, et al. Affecting factors and application of the stable hydrogen isotopes of alkane gases[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(3): 496-508.
[27] HE Kun, ZHANG Shuichang, MI Jingkui, et al. Carbon and hydrogen isotope fractionation for methane from non-isothermal pyrolysis of oil in anhydrous and hydrothermal conditions[J]. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2019, 37(5): 1558-1576.
[28] LEWAN M D, ROY S.Role of water in hydrocarbon generation from Type-I kerogen in Mahogany oil shale of the Green River Formation[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2011, 42(1): 31-41.
[29] GAO Ling, SCHIMMELMANN A, TANG Yongchun, et al. Isotope rollover in shale gas observed in laboratory pyrolysis experiments: Insight to the role of water in thermogenesis of mature gas[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2014, 68(3): 95-106.
[30] WANG Xiaofeng, LIU Wenhui, SHI Baoguang, et al. Hydrogen isotope characteristics of thermogenic methane in Chinese sedimentary basins[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2015, 83/84: 178-189.
[31] SCHIMMELMANN A, BOUDOU J P, LEWAN M D, et al. Experimental controls on D/H and 13C/12C ratios of kerogen, bitumen and oil during hydrous pyrolysis[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2001, 32(8): 1009-1018.
[32] LI Maowen, HUANG Yongsong, OBERMAJER M, et al. Hydrogen isotopic compositions of vidividual alkanes as a new approach to petroleum correlation: Case studies from the Western Canada sedimentary basin[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2001, 32(12): 1387-1399.
[33] 谢增业, 杨春龙, 董才源, 等. 四川盆地中泥盆统和中二叠统天然气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(4): 447-461.
XIE Zengye, YANG Chunlong, DONG Caiyuan, et al. Geochemical characteristics and genesis of Middle Devonian and Middle Permian natural gas in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(4): 447-461.
[34] 夏威, 于炳松, 孙梦迪. 渝东南YK 1井下寒武统牛蹄塘组底部黑色页岩沉积环境及有机质富集机制[J]. 矿物岩石, 2015, 35(2): 70-80.
XIA Wei, YU Bingsong, SUN Mengdi.Depositional setting and enrichment mechanism of organic matter of the black shales of Niutitang Formation at the bottom of Lower Cambrian, in well Yuke1, Southeast Chongqian[J]. Mineralogy and Petrology, 2015, 35(2): 70-80.
[35] 施振生, 谢武仁, 马石玉, 等. 四川盆地上三叠统须家河组四段-六段海侵沉积记录[J]. 古地理学报, 2012, 14(5): 583-595.
SHI Zhensheng, XIE Wuren, MA Shiyu, et al. Transgression sedimentary records of the members 4-6 of upper Triassic Xujiahe formation in Sichuan basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2012, 14(5): 583-595.
[36] 沈平, 徐永昌, 刘文汇, 等. 天然气研究中的稀有气体地球化学应用模式[J]. 沉积学报, 1995, 13(2): 48-58.
SHEN Ping, XU Yongchang, LIU Wenhui, et al. Applied models of rare gas geochemistry in the research of natural gases[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1995, 13(2): 48-58.
[37] 冯许魁, 刘永彬, 韩长伟, 等. 塔里木盆地震旦系裂谷发育特征及其对油气勘探的指导意义[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2015, 29(2): 5-10.
FENG Xukui, LIU Yongbin, HAN Changwei, et al. Sinian rift valley development characteristics in Tarim basin and its guidance on hydrocarbon exploration[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2015, 29(2): 5-10.
[38] 李勇, 陈才, 冯晓军, 等. 塔里木盆地西南部南华纪裂谷体系的发现及意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2016, 32(3): 825-832.
LI Yong, CHEN Cai, FENG Xiaojun, et al. New discovery of Nanhuaian rift system in southwestern Tarim basin and its geological significance[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2016, 32(3): 825-832.
[39] 吴林, 管树巍, 杨海军, 等. 塔里木北部新元古代裂谷盆地古地理格局与油气勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(4): 375-385.
WU Lin, GUAN Shuwei, YANG Haijun, et al. The paleogeographic framework and hydrocarbon exploration potential of Neoproterozoic rift basin in northern Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(4): 375-385.
[40] 田小彬, 李强, 王年梅, 等. 塔东隆起带震旦系古油藏的发现及勘探意义[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(4): 64-69.
TIAN Xiaobin, LI Qiang, WANG Nianmei, et al. Discovery of Sinian paleo-oil pool in east Tarim uplift zone and its exploration significance[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26(4): 64-69.
[41] 杨海军, 陈永权, 田军, 等. 塔里木盆地轮探1井超深层油气勘探重大发现与意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 62-72.
YANG Haijun, CHEN Yongquan, TIAN Jun, et al. Great discovery and its significance of ultra-deep oil and gas exploration in well Luntan-1 of the Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2): 62-72.
[42] 管树巍, 吴林, 任荣, 等. 中国主要克拉通前寒武纪裂谷分布与油气勘探前景[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(1): 9-22.
GUAN Shuwei, WU Lin, REN Rong, et al. Distribution and petroleum prospect of Precambrian rifts in the main cratons, China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(1): 9-22.
[43] 汪泽成, 刘静江, 姜华, 等. 中-上扬子地区震旦纪陡山沱组沉积期岩相古地理及勘探意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(1): 39-51.
WANG Zecheng, LIU Jingjiang, JIANG Hua, et al. Lithofacies paleogeography and exploration significance of Sinian Doushantuo depositional stage in the middle-upper Yangtze region, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(1): 39-51.
[44] XIAO Di, CAO Jian, LUO Bing, et al. Neoproterozoic postglacial paleoenvironment and hydrocarbon potential: A review and new insights from the Doushantuo Formation Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2021, 212: 1-30
[45] 魏国齐, 王志宏, 李剑, 等. 四川盆地震旦系、寒武系烃源岩特征、资源潜力与勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(1): 1-13.
WEI Guoqi, WANG Zhihong, LI Jian, et al. Characteristics of source rocks, resource potential and exploration direction of Sinian and Cambrian in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(1): 1-13.
[46] 赵文智, 王兆云, 王红军, 等. 再论有机质“接力成气”的内涵与意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38(2): 129-135.
ZHAO Wenzhi, WANG Zhaoyun, WANG Hongjun, et al. Further discussion on the connotation and significance of the natural gas relaying generation model from organic materials[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(2): 129-135.
[47] 张水昌, 胡国艺, 柳少波, 等. 中国天然气形成与分布[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2019.
ZHANG Shuichang, HU Guoyi, LIU Shaobo, et al. Chinese natural gas formation and distribution[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2019.
[48] 陈娅娜, 沈安江, 潘立银, 等. 微生物白云岩储集层特征、成因和分布: 以四川盆地震旦系灯影组四段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(5): 704-715.
CHEN Yana, SHEN Anjiang, PAN Liyin, et al. Features, origin and distribution of microbial dolomite reservoirs: A case study of 4th Member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(5): 704-715.
[49] 沈安江, 赵文智, 胡安平, 等. 海相碳酸盐岩储集层发育主控因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(5): 545-554.
SHEN Anjiang, ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Anping, et al. Major factors controlling the development of marine carbonate reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(5): 545-554.
[50] 沈安江, 胡安平, 程婷, 等. 激光原位U-Pb同位素定年技术及其在碳酸盐岩成岩-孔隙演化中的应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(6): 1062-1074.
SHEN Anjiang, HU Anping, CHENG Ting, et al. Laser ablation in situ U-Pb dating and its application to diagenesis-porosity evolution of carbonate reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(6): 1062-1074.
[51] 胡安平, 沈安江, 杨翰轩, 等. 碳酸盐岩-膏盐岩共生体系白云岩成因及储盖组合[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(5): 916-928.
HU Anping, SHEN Anjiang, YANG Hanxuan, et al. Dolomite genesis and reservoir-cap rock assemblage in carbonate-evaporate paragenesis system[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(5): 916-928.
[52] 赵文智, 沈安江, 乔占峰, 等. 白云岩成因类型、识别特征及储集空间成因[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(6): 923-935.
ZHAO Wenzhi, SHEN Anjiang, QIAO Zhanfeng, et al. Genetic types and distinguished characteristics of dolomite and the origin of dolomite reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(6): 923-935.
[53] 徐春春, 沈平, 杨跃明, 等. 四川盆地川中古隆起震旦系-下古生界天然气勘探新认识及勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(7): 1-9.
XU Chunchun, SHEN Ping, YANG Yueming, et al. New understandings and potential of Sinian-Lower Paleozoic natural gas exploration in the central Sichuan paleo-uplift of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(7): 1-9.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

版权所有：《石油勘探与开发》编辑部；《石油勘探与开发（英文）》编辑部
地址：北京市海淀区学院路20号，中国石油勘探开发研究院数据中心605室　

京ICP备15044687号    技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司