石油勘探与开发 >

2021 , Vol. 48 >Issue 4: 777 - 786

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11698/PED.2021.04.10

油气勘探

渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段湖相页岩油甜点评价与勘探实践

  • 韩文中 ,
  • 赵贤正 ,
  • 金凤鸣 ,
  • 蒲秀刚 ,
  • 陈世悦 ,
  • 牟连刚 ,
  • 张伟 ,
  • 时战楠 ,
  • 汪虎
展开
  • 1.中国石油大港油田公司,天津 300280;
    2.中国石油大学（华东）,山东青岛 266580
韩文中（1979-）,男,山东鄄城人,硕士,中国石油大港油田公司勘探开发研究院高级工程师,主要从事页岩油、致密油、沉积体系和储集层评价研究。地址：天津市滨海新区幸福路1278号,中国石油大港油田公司勘探开发研究院基础与规划研究所,邮政编码：300280。E-mail: hanwzhong@petrochina.com.cn

收稿日期: 2020-08-02

  修回日期: 2021-06-23

  网络出版日期: 2021-07-23

基金资助

中国石油科技重大专项“大港油区效益增储稳产关键技术研究与应用”（2018E-11）; “陆相中高成熟度页岩油勘探开发关键技术研究与应用”（2019E-2601）

收起

Sweet spots evaluation and exploration of lacustrine shale oil of the second member of Paleogene Kongdian Formation in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin

  • HAN Wenzhong ,
  • ZHAO Xianzheng ,
  • JIN Fengming ,
  • PU Xiugang ,
  • CHEN Shiyue ,
  • MU Liangang ,
  • ZHANG Wei ,
  • SHI Zhannan ,
  • WANG Hu
Expand
  • 1. PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China;
    2. China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China

Received date: 2020-08-02

  Revised date: 2021-06-23

  Online published: 2021-07-23

Fold

摘要

基于岩心、薄片、X射线衍射、岩石热解、CT扫描、核磁共振及试油资料,研究黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷古近系孔二段陆相页岩层系宏观及微观的组分、沉积结构特征及页岩油甜点评价标准和方法,确定页岩油水平井最佳甜点箱体。根据优势岩石类型、韵律结构及测井曲线特征,建立了薄层状灰云质页岩、纹层状混合质页岩、纹层状长英质页岩和层状灰云质页岩4类页岩岩相,将孔二段一亚段划分为（PS1—PS4）4个准层序。PS1页岩孔隙度大于6%,黏土含量小于20%,S1值小于4 mg/g;PS2页岩纹层结构发育,大孔径孔喉、连通性较好、有机碳及可动烃含量高,S1值大于4 mg/g、TOC值为2%~6%、黏土含量小于20%、孔隙度大于4%;PS3页岩S1值大于6 mg/g,黏土含量为20%~30%,孔隙度小于4%;PS4页岩TOC值偏低、含油性相对较差。建立了游离烃含量（S1）、页岩韵律结构、黏土含量、TOC及孔隙度等5参数的页岩油评价分类标准,以及5参数赋权重甜点层定量评价方法和评价指数EI。综合分析分析认为PS2最优,是页岩油地质-工程双甜点,其次是PS3和PS1,前者侧重于页岩油地质甜点而后者则偏于工程甜点,最后为PS4。优选PS2和PS3两套页岩油甜点钻探,多口直井和水平井获得高产,其中1701H井稳产623 d、累产超万吨,展示孔二段页岩油良好的勘探前景。 图9 表5 参33

关键词： 页岩岩相; 韵律结构; 赋权重定量评价; 页岩油甜点; 页岩油评价标准; 沧东凹陷; 渤海湾盆地; 古近系; 孔二段

本文引用格式

韩文中 , 赵贤正 , 金凤鸣 , 蒲秀刚 , 陈世悦 , 牟连刚 , 张伟 , 时战楠 , 汪虎 . 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段湖相页岩油甜点评价与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021 , 48(4) : 777 -786 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2021.04.10

Abstract

Based on the systematic data of cores, thin section, X-ray diffraction, rock pyrolysis, CT scanning, nuclear magnetic resonance and oil testing of Paleogene Kong 2 Member in Cangdong sag, Huanghua depression, the macro and micro components, sedimentary structure characteristics of the Kong 2 Member shales, and evaluation standard and method of shale oil sweet spot are studied, and the best shale sections for horizontal wells are determined. According to the dominant rock type, rhythmic structure and logging curve characteristics, four types of shale lithofacies are established, namely, thin-layered dolomitic shale, lamellar mixed shale, lamellar felsic shale, and bedded dolomitic shale, and the Kong 21 sub-member is divided into four parasequences PS1 to PS4. The study shows that PS1 shale has a porosity higher than 6% and clay content of less than 20%, but S1 of less than 4 mg/g; PS2 shale has laminar structure, large size and good connectivity of pores and throats, high TOC (2%-6%) and high content of movable hydrocarbon, S1 of over 4 mg/g, clay content of less than 20%, and porosity of more than 4%; PS3 shale has a S1 value higher than 6 mg/g and a clay content of 20%-30%, but porosity of less than 4%; PS4 shale has low TOC and poor oil-bearing property. The shale oil classification and evaluation criteria based on five parameters, free hydrocarbon content S1, shale rhythmic structure, clay content, TOC and porosity, and the evaluation method of the weighted five parameters and the evaluation index EI are established. Comprehensive analysis shows that PS2 is the best, which is the geological engineering double sweet spot of shale oil, followed by PS3 and PS1, the former focuses on the geological sweet spot of shale oil, the latter on the engineering sweet spot, and the last is PS4. Two sets of shale oil sweet spots, PS2 and PS3, are selected and several vertical and horizontal wells drilled in these sweet spots have achieved high oil production. Among them, Well 1701H has produced stably for 623 days, with cumulative production of over 10 000 tons, showing a good exploration prospect of lacustrine shale oil in Kong 2 Member.

Key words： shale lithofacies; rhythmic structure; weighted quantitative evaluation; shale oil sweet spot; shale oil evaluation criterion; Cangdong sag; Bohai Bay Basin; 2nd member of Paleogene Kongdian Formation

参考文献

[1] 宋岩, 李卓, 姜振学, 等. 非常规油气地质研究进展与发展趋势[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(4): 638-349.
SONG Yan, LI Zhuo, JIANG Zhenxue, et al. Progress and development trend of unconventional oil and gas geological research[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(4): 638-349.
[2] 王红军, 马锋, 童晓光, 等. 全球非常规油气资源评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(6): 850-862.
WANG Hongjun, MA Feng, TONG Xiaoguang, et al. Assessment of global unconventional oil and gas resources[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(6): 850-862.
[3] 张廷山, 彭志, 杨巍, 等. 美国页岩油研究对我国的启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3): 1-10.
ZHANG Tingshan, PENG Zhi, YANG Wei, et al. Enlightenments of American shale oil research towards China[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(3): 1-10.
[4] 焦方正, 邹才能, 杨智. 陆相源内石油聚集地质理论认识及勘探开发实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6): 1067-1078.
JIAO Fangzheng, ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi. Geological theory and exploration and development practice of hydrocarbon accumulation inside continental source kitchens[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6): 1067-1078.
[5] 付金华, 李士祥, 牛小兵, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7段页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5): 870-883.
FU Jinhua, LI Shixiang, NIU Xiaobing, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration of shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5): 870-883.
[6] 杨华, 李士祥, 刘显阳. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(1): 1-11.
YANG Hua, LI Shixiang, LIU Xianyang. Characteristics and resource prospects of tight oil and shale oil in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1): l-11.
[7] 蒲秀刚, 周立宏, 韩文中, 等. 歧口凹陷沙一下亚段斜坡区重力流沉积与致密油勘探[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(2): 138-150.
PU Xiugang, ZHOU Lihong, HAN Wenzhong, et al. Gravity flow sedimentation and tight oil exploration in lower first member of Shahejie Formation in slope area of Qikou Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(2): 138-150.
[8] 刘成林, 李冰, 吴林强, 等. 松辽盆地上白垩统页岩油地质条件评价[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2016.
LIU Chenglin, LI Bing, WU Linqiang, et al. Evaluation on Cretaceous geological conditions of oil shale in Songliao Basin[M]. Beijing: Geology Publishing House, 2016.
[9] 金之均, 胡宗全, 高波, 等. 川东南地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集与高产控制因素[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(1): 1-10.
JIN Zhijun, HU Zongquan, GAO Bo, et al. Controlling factors on the enrichment and high productivity of shale gas in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(1): 1-10.
[10] 孙焕泉. 济阳坳陷页岩油勘探实践与认识[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(4): 1-14.
SUN Huanquan. Exploration practice and cognitions of shale oil in Jiyang Depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(4): 1-14.
[11] 蒲秀刚, 韩文中, 周立宏, 等. 黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷孔二段高位体系域细粒相区岩性特征及地质意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2015, 20(5): 30-40.
PU Xiugang, HAN Wenzhong, ZHOU Lihong, et al. Lithologic characteristics and geological implication of fine-grained sedimentation in Ek2 high stand system tract of Cangdong Sag, Huanghua Depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2015, 20(5): 30-40.
[12] 蒲秀刚, 周立宏, 韩文中, 等. 细粒相沉积地质特征与致密油勘探: 以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(1): 24-34.
PU Xiugang, ZHOU Lihong, HAN Wenzhong, et al. Geologic features of fine-grained facies sedimentation and tight oil exploration: A case from the second Member of Paleogene Kongdian Formation of Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(1): 24-34.
[13] 赵文智, 朱如凯, 胡素云, 等. 陆相富有机质页岩与泥岩的成藏差异及其在页岩油评价中的意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6): 1079-1089.
ZHAO Wenzhi, ZHU Rukai, HU Suyun, et al. Accumulation contribution differences between lacustrine organic-rich shales and mudstones and their significance in shale oil evaluation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6): 1079-1089.
[14] 赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 湖相页岩滞留烃形成条件与富集模式: 以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古近系为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5): 856-869.
ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, PU Xiugang, et al. Formation conditions and enrichment model of retained petroleum in lacustrine shale: A case study of the Paleogene in Huanghua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5): 856-869.
[15] 国家能源局. 烃源岩地球化学评价方法: SY/T 5735—2019[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2019.
National Energy Administration. Geochemical evaluation methods of source rocks: SY/T 5735—2019[S]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2019.
[16] 邹才能, 池英柳, 李明, 等. 陆相层序地层学分析技术[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2004.
ZOU Caineng, CHI Yingliu, LI Ming, et al. Analysis technology of continental sequence stratigraphy[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2004.
[17] 国家市场监督管理总局. 页岩油地质评价方法: GB/T 38718—2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020.
State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration. Geological evaluating methods for shale oil: GB/T 38718—2020[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2020.
[18] 贾承造, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等. 中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(3): 343-350.
JIA Chengzao, ZOU Caineng, LI Jianzhong, et al. Assessment criteria, main types, basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3): 343-350.
[19] 杨智, 侯连华, 陶士振, 等. 致密油与页岩油形成条件与“甜点区”评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(5): 555-566.
YANG Zhi, HOU Lianhua, TAO Shizhen, et al. Formation conditions and “Sweet Spot ” evaluation of tight oil and shale oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(5): 555-566.
[20] 赵文智, 胡素云, 侯连华, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1): 1-10.
ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, HOU Lianhua, et al. Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 1-10.
[21] ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, ZHU Rukai, Geologic significance and optimization technique of sweet spots in unconventional shale systems[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2019, 178: 3-19.
[22] 宋明水, 刘惠民, 王勇, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集规律认识与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(2): 225-235.
SONG Mingshui, LIU Huimin, WANG Yong, et al. Enrichment rules and exploration practices of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2): 225-235.
[23] 郭旭光, 何文军, 杨森, 等. 准噶尔盆地页岩油“甜点区”评价与关键技术应用: 以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1168-1179.
GUO Xuguang, HE Wenjun, YANG Sen, et al. Evaluation and application of key technologies of “sweet area” of shale oil in Junggar Basin: Case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Depression[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(8): 1168-1179.
[24] 王勇, 宋国奇, 刘惠民, 等. 济阳坳陷页岩油富集主控因素[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2015, 22(4): 20-25.
WANG Yong, SONG Guoqi, LIU Huimin, et al. Main control factors of enrichment characteristics of shale oil in Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2015, 22(4): 20-25.
[25] 卢双舫, 黄文彪, 陈方文, 等. 页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2): 249-256.
LU Shuangfang, HUANG Wenbiao, CHEN Fangwen, et al. Classification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources: Discussion and application[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2): 249-256.
[26] 余涛, 卢双舫, 李俊乾, 等. 东营凹陷页岩油游离资源有利区预测[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(1): 16-21.
YU Tao, LU Shuangfang, LI Junqian, et al. Prediction for favorable area of shale oil free resources in Dongying Sag[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2018, 25(1): 16-21.
[27] 黄振凯, 刘全有, 黎茂稳, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段泥页岩层系排烃效率及其含油性[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(3): 513-521.
HUANG Zhenkai, LIU Quanyou, LI Maowen, et al. Hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency and oil-bearing property of the shale system in Chang 7 Member, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(3): 513-521.
[28] JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: Part 2: Shale-oil resource systems[J]. AAPG Memoir, 2012, 97: 89-119.
[29] BOWKER K A. Recent development of the Barnett Shale play, Fort Worth Basin[J]. West Texas Geological Society Bulletin, 2003, 42(6): 1-11.
[30] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 海相页岩气勘探目标优选方法: GB/T 35110—2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Target optimization method for marine shale gas exploration: GB/T 35110—2017[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2017.
[31] 邹才能, 陶士振, 侯连华, 等. 非常规油气地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2013.
ZOU Caineng, TAO Shizhen, HOU Lianhua, et al. Unconventional petroleum geology[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2013.
[32] 姜在兴, 张文昭, 梁超, 等. 页岩油储层基本特征及评价要素[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(1): 184-196.
JIANG Zaixing, ZHANG Wenzhao, LIANG Chao, et al. Characteristics and evaluation elements of shale oil reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(1): 184-196.
[33] 赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段页岩油地质特征与勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 643-657.
ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, PU Xiugang, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration breakthrough of shale oil in Member 3 of Shahejie Formation of Qibei Subsag, Qikou Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(6): 643-657.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

版权所有：《石油勘探与开发》编辑部；《石油勘探与开发（英文）》编辑部
地址：北京市海淀区学院路20号，中国石油勘探开发研究院数据中心605室　

京ICP备15044687号    技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司