石油勘探与开发 >

2021 , Vol. 48 >Issue 3: 603 - 612

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11698/PED.2021.03.15

油气田开发

页岩油注二氧化碳提高采收率影响因素核磁共振实验

  • 郎东江 ,
  • 伦增珉 ,
  • 吕成远 ,
  • 王海涛 ,
  • 赵清民 ,
  • 盛寒
展开
  • 1.中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083;
    2.中海油能源发展股份有限公司工程技术分公司,天津 300452
郎东江（1962-）,男,江西波阳人,硕士,中国石化石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师,主要从事核磁共振、CT在石油勘探开发中的应用研究。地址:北京市海淀区学院路31号,中国石化石油勘探开发研究院提高采收率技术研究所,邮政编码:100083。E-mail: langdj.syky@sinopec.com

收稿日期: 2020-10-12

  网络出版日期: 2021-05-21

基金资助

中国石化科技部基础前瞻项目“页岩油储层注CO2萃取渗吸机理研究”

收起

Nuclear magnetic resonance experimental study of CO2 injection to enhance shale oil recovery

  • LANG Dongjiang ,
  • LUN Zengmin ,
  • LYU Chengyuan ,
  • WANG Haitao ,
  • ZHAO Qingmin ,
  • SHENG Han
Expand
  • 1. Sinopec Petroleum Exploration & Production Research Institute, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. EnerTech-Drilling & Production Co., CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Limited, Tianjin 300452, China

Received date: 2020-10-12

  Online published: 2021-05-21

Fold

摘要

利用核磁共振技术开展页岩油储集层注CO2提高采收率影响因素的实验研究,根据核磁共振T2（横向弛豫时间）谱分析作用时间、压力、温度对提高采收率的影响,根据核磁共振图像分析裂缝发育程度对提高采收率的影响。研究表明,注CO2过程中随着作用时间延长,采出程度逐渐增大。压力增加,采出程度逐渐增大。温度升高,页岩油的采出程度先增加后逐渐减小。对于基质岩心,注CO2初始阶段动用了岩心表面周边区域原油,采出程度增幅较大,随着作用时间的延长,CO2扩散到岩心内部,动用了岩心内部的油,采出程度增长逐渐变缓。对于基质-裂缝岩心,注CO2初始阶段裂缝及裂缝周边区域的油先被采出,采出程度增幅较大,随着作用时间的延长,CO2从裂缝空间和岩心表面扩散到岩心内部,动用了岩心内部的油,采出程度增长逐渐变缓。裂缝扩大了注入CO2与原油的接触面积,裂缝越多、裂缝的评价指标越大,页岩油的采出程度越大。图13表7参34

关键词： 页岩油; 二氧化碳; 提高采收率; 核磁共振; 采出程度; 裂缝

本文引用格式

郎东江 , 伦增珉 , 吕成远 , 王海涛 , 赵清民 , 盛寒 . 页岩油注二氧化碳提高采收率影响因素核磁共振实验[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021 , 48(3) : 603 -612 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2021.03.15

Abstract

Factors affecting CO2 flooding of shale oil reservoir were studied by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments, the effects of time, pressure, temperature on the recovery of CO2 flooding in shale oil reservoir were analyzed based on nuclear magnetic resonance T2 spectrum, and the effect of fracture development degree on recovery of CO2 flooding in shale oil reservoir was analyzed based on NMR images. In the process of CO2 flooding, the recovery degree of the shale oil reservoir gradually increases with time. With the rise of pressure, the recovery degree of the shale oil reservoir goes up gradually. With the rise of temperature, the recovery degree of shale oil increases first and then decreases gradually. For CO2 flooding in matrix core, the crude oil around the core surface is produced in the initial stage, with recovery degree going up rapidly; with the ongoing of CO2 injection, the CO2 gradually diffuses into the inside of core to produce the oil, and the increase of recovery degree slows down gradually. For CO2 flooding in matrix core with fractures, in the initial stage, the oil in and around the fractures are produced first, and the recovery degree goes up fast; with the extension of CO2 injection time, CO2 diffuses into the inside of the core from the fractures and the core surface to produce the oil inside the core, and the increase of recovery degree gradually slows down. Fractures increase the contact area between injected CO2 and crude oil, and the more the fractures and the greater the evaluation index of fractures, the greater the recovery degree of shale oil will be.

Key words： shale oil; CO2; EOR; nuclear magnetic resonance; recovery degree; fracture

参考文献

[1] 张廷山, 彭志, 杨巍, 等. 美国页岩油研究对我国的启示[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(3): 1-10.
ZHANG Tingshan, PENG Zhi, YANG Wei, et al. Enlightenment of American shale oil research on China[J]. Rock Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2015, 27(3): 1-10.
[2] 张林晔, 李钜源, 李政, 等. 北美页岩油气研究进展及对中国陆相页岩油气勘探的思考[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(6): 700-711.
ZHANG Linye, LI Juyuan, LI Zheng, et al. Research progress of North American shale oil and gas and reflections on China’s continental shale oil and gas exploration[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2014, 29(6): 700-711.
[3] 边瑞康, 武晓玲, 包书景, 等. 美国页岩油分布规律及成藏特点[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 29(1): 1-15.
BIAN Ruikang, WU Xiaoling, BAO Shujing, et al. Distribution law and accumulation characteristics of shale oil in the United States[J]. Journal of Xi’an Petroleum University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 29(1): 1-15.
[4] 罗承先, 周韦慧. 美国页岩油开发现状及其巨大影响[J]. 中外能源, 2013, 18(3): 33-40.
LUO Chengxian, ZHOU Weihui. Current situation of shale oil development in the United States and its huge impact[J]. Chinese and Foreign Energy, 2013, 18(3): 33-40.
[5] 卢双舫, 薛海涛, 王民, 等. 页岩油评价中的若干关键问题及研究趋势[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(10): 1309-1322.
LU Shuangfang, XUE Haitao, WANG Min, et al. Several key issues and research trends in evaluation of shale oil[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(10): 1309-1322.
[6] 姜在兴, 张文昭, 梁超, 等. 页岩油储集层基本特征及评价要素[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(1): 184-196.
JIANG Zaixing, ZHANG Wenzhao, LIANG Chao, et al. Characteristics and evaluation elements of shale oil reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(1): 184-196.
[7] 卢双舫, 李俊乾, 张鹏飞, 等. 页岩油储集层微观孔喉分类与分级评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(3): 436-444.
LU Shuangfang, LI Junqian, ZHANG Pengfei, et al. Classification of microscopic pore-throats and the grading evaluation on shale oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(3): 436-444.
[8] 蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 等. 不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(6): 842-849.
JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, QIAN Menhui, et al. Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(6): 842-849.
[9] 王茂林, 程鹏, 田辉, 等. 页岩油储层评价指标体系[J]. 地球化学, 2017, 46(2): 178-190.
WANG Maolin, CHENG Peng, TIAN Hui, et al. Evaluation index system of shale oil reservoirs[J]. Geochimica, 2017, 46(2): 178-190.
[10] 宁方兴, 王学军, 郝雪峰, 等. 济阳坳陷页岩油赋存状态和可动性分析[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2015, 11(3): 1-5.
NING Fangxing, WANG Xuejun, HAO Xuefeng, et al. Occurrence state and mobility analysis of shale oil in Jiyang depression[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2015, 11(3): 1-5.
[11] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 白斌, 等. 中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(6): 1857-1864.
ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, BAI Bin, et al. The first discovery of nanopores in oil and gas reservoirs in China and its scientific value[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2011, 27(6): 1857-1864.
[12] 梅海燕, 何浪, 张茂林, 等. 页岩油注气提高采收率现状及可行性分析[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018, 8(6): 77-82.
MEI Haiyan, HE Lang, ZHANG Maolin, et al. Status and feasibility analysis on improved shale-oil recovery by gas injection[J]. Reservoirs Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(6): 77-82.
[13] 蒋天遥. 页岩气藏注CO2提高采收率技术研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2018.
JIANG Tianyao. Research on enhanced oil recovery with CO2 injection in shale gas reservoir[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2018.
[14] 陈强, 孙雷, 潘毅, 等. 页岩纳米孔内超临界CO2、CH4传输行为实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(5): 154-162.
CHEN Qiang, SUN Lei, PAN Yi, et al. Experimental study on the transmission behaviors of supercritical CO2 and CH4 in shale nanopores[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science and Technology Edition), 2018, 40(5): 154-162.
[15] 李仕伦, 汤勇, 侯承希. 注CO2提高采收率技术现状及发展趋势[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(3): 1-8.
LI Shilun, TANG Yong, HOU Chengxi. Present situation and development trend of CO2 injection enhanced oil recovery technology[J]. Oil and Gas Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3): 1-8.
[16] 梁福元, 周洪钟, 刘为民, 等. CO2吞吐技术在断块油藏的应用[J]. 断块油气田, 2001, 8(4): 55-57.
LIANG Fuyuan, ZHOU Hongzhong, LIU Weimin, et al. Application of CO2 stimulation in fault-block reservoir[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Fields, 2001, 8(4): 55-57.
[17] 刘炳官. CO2吞吐法在低渗透油藏的试验[J]. 特种油气藏, 1996, 3(2): 45-50.
LIU Bingguan. CO2 stimulation test in low permeability reservoir[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 1996, 3(2): 45-50.
[18] 杨胜来, 郎兆新. 影响CO2吞吐采油效果的若干因素研究[J]. 西安石油学院学报(自然科学版), 2002, 17(1): 32-36.
YANG Shenglai, LANG Zhaoxin. Study on several factors affecting the effects of CO2 stimulation and oil recovery[J]. Journal of Xi’an Petroleum University (Natural Science Edition), 2002, 17(1): 32-36.
[19] 高慧梅, 何应付, 周锡生. 注CO2提高原油采收率技术研究进展[J]. 特种油气藏, 2009, 16(1): 6-12.
GAO Huimei, HE Yingfu, ZHOU Xisheng. Research progress on enhanced oil recovery by CO2 injection[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2009, 16(1): 6-12.
[20] 沈平平, 江怀友, 陈永武, 等. CO2注入技术提高采收率研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2007, 14(3): 1-4.
SHEN Pingping, JIANG Huaiyou, CHEN Yongwu, et al. Study on enhanced oil recovery by CO2 injection[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2007, 14(3): 1-4.
[21] 李士伦, 张正卿, 冉新权, 等. 注气提高石油采收率技术[M]. 成都: 四川科学技术出版社, 2001: 1-6.
LI Shilun, ZHANG Zhengqing, RAN Xinquan, et al. Gas injection enhanced oil recovery technology[M]. Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Technology Press, 2001: 1-6.
[22] 祝春生, 程林松. 低渗透油藏CO2驱提高原油采收率评价研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2007, 6(30): 55-60.
ZHU Chunsheng, CHENG Linsong. Evaluation of enhanced oil recovery by CO2 flooding in low permeability reservoirs[J]. Drilling and Production Technology, 2007, 6(30): 55-60.
[23] JIA B, TSAU J S, BARATI R. A review of the current progress of CO2 injection EOR and carbon storage in shale oil reservoirs[J]. Fuel, 2019, 236: 404-427.
[24] ELWEGAA K, EMADI H, SOLIMAN M, et al. Improving oil recovery from shale oil reservoirs using cyclic cold carbon dioxide injection: An experimental study[J]. Fuel, 2019, 254: 115716.
[25] WANG Sai, LIU Kouqi, HAN Juan, et al. Investigation of properties alternation during super-critical CO2 injection in shale[J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(8): 1686.
[26] LI L, ZHANG Y, SHENG J J. Effect of injection pressure on enhancing oil recovery in shale cores during the CO2 huff-n-puff process when it is above and below MMP[J]. Energy Fuels, 2017, 31(4): 3856-3867.
[27] GAMADI T D, SHENG J J, SOLIMAN M Y, et al. An experimental study of cyclic CO2 injection to improve shale oil recovery[R]. SPE 169142, 2014.
[28] FRANCISCO D, TOVAR L, OYVIND E, et al. Experimental investigation of enhanced recovery in unconventional liquid reservoirs using CO2: A look ahead to the future of unconventional EOR[R]. SPE 169022-MS, 2014.
[29] KOVSCEK A R, TANG G Q, VEGA B. Experimental investigation of oil recovery from siliceous shale by CO2 injection[R]. SPE 115679-MS, 2008.
[30] VEGA B, BRIEN W J, KOVSCEK A R. Experimental investigation of oil recovery from siliceous shale by miscible CO2 injection[R]. SPE 135627-MS, 2010.
[31] HAWTHORNE S B, GORECKI C D, SORENSEN J A, et al. Hydrocarbon mobilization mechanisms from upper middle and lower Bakken reservoir rocks exposed to CO2[R]. SPE 167200-MS, 2013.
[32] ALHARTHY N, TEKLU T, KAZEMI H, et al. Enhanced oil recovery in liquid-rich shale reservoirs: Laboratory to field[R]. SPE 175034-MS, 2015.
[33] 李海波, 朱巨义, 郭和坤. 核磁共振T2谱换算孔隙半径分布方法研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2008, 25(2): 273-279.
LI Haibo, ZHU Juyi, GUO Hekun. Methods for calculating pore radius distribution in rock from NMR T2 spectra[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2008, 25(2): 273-279.
[34] 宁传祥, 姜振学, 苏思远, 等. 泥页岩核磁共振T2谱换算孔隙半径方法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(27): 14-19.
NING Chuanxiang, JIANG Zhenxue, SU Siyuan, et al. Methods for calculating pore radius distribution in shale reservoirs from NMR T2 spectra[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(27): 14-19.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

版权所有：《石油勘探与开发》编辑部；《石油勘探与开发（英文）》编辑部
地址：北京市海淀区学院路20号，中国石油勘探开发研究院数据中心605室　

京ICP备15044687号    技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司