石油勘探与开发 >

2021 , Vol. 48 >Issue 3: 464 - 475

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11698/PED.2021.03.03

油气勘探

陆相源内与源外油气成藏的烃源灶差异

  • 赵文智 ,
  • 张斌 ,
  • 王晓梅 ,
  • 吴松涛 ,
  • 张水昌 ,
  • 刘伟 ,
  • 王坤 ,
  • 赵霞
展开
  • 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083;
    2.中国石油大学（北京）地球科学学院,北京 102249
赵文智（1958-）,男,河北昌黎人,博士,中国石油勘探开发研究院教授级高级工程师,中国工程院院士,主要从事石油天然气地质综合研究和科研管理工作。地址:北京市海淀区学院路20号,中国石油勘探开发研究院,邮政编码:100083。E-mail: zwz@petrochina.com.cn

收稿日期: 2021-01-14

  网络出版日期: 2021-05-21

基金资助

国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05046,2017ZX05001）; 中国石油勘探开发研究院科学研究与技术开发项目（2018ycq02）

收起

Differences in source kitchens for lacustrine in-source and out-of-source hydrocarbon accumulations

  • ZHAO Wenzhi ,
  • ZHANG Bin ,
  • WANG Xiaomei ,
  • WU Songtao ,
  • ZHANG Shuichang ,
  • LIU Wei ,
  • WANG Kun ,
  • ZHAO Xia
Expand
  • 1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249

Received date: 2021-01-14

  Online published: 2021-05-21

Fold

摘要

源内和源外油气成藏过程存在显著差异,导致二者对烃源灶的要求明显不同。基于中国陆相已知常规油藏的源-藏对应关系和页岩油烃源灶特征研究,论证常规油藏与页岩油的烃源灶差异性。常规油气藏大多数都分布在源外,其形成是油气受浮力作用发生由分散到富集的过程,油气聚集不一定需要很高的母质丰度,但需要较高的排烃效率和排烃量,烃源岩TOC门限值为0.5%,最佳区间为1%~3%。源内油气藏以页岩油气为主,是油气在源内的滞留,缺少大规模运移富集过程,对烃源岩质量和规模要求更高。中高成熟度页岩油TOC门限值为2%,最佳区间为3%~5%,中低成熟度页岩油TOC门限值为6%,且越高越好;有机质类型以Ⅰ—Ⅱ1倾油型有机质为宜。开展烃源岩品质与分级评价,寻找规模优质烃源岩富集区和富集段,是油气勘探从源外进入源内必须关注的科学问题,目的是为即将到来的页岩油富集区选区和选段、经济发现与客观评价资源潜力等提供理论指导。图12表1参37

关键词： 常规油气藏; 源外聚集; 页岩油; 源内滞留; 烃源灶差异; 有机质丰度; 陆相; 优质烃源岩

本文引用格式

赵文智 , 张斌 , 王晓梅 , 吴松涛 , 张水昌 , 刘伟 , 王坤 , 赵霞 . 陆相源内与源外油气成藏的烃源灶差异[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021 , 48(3) : 464 -475 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2021.03.03

Abstract

Because of the differences of hydrocarbon accumulation between in-source and out-of-source oil pools, the demand for source kitchen is different. Based on the establishment of source-to-reservoir correlation in the known conventional accumulations, and the characteristics of shale oil source kitchens as well, this paper discusses the differences of source kitchens for the formation of both conventional and shale oils. The formation of conventional oil pools is a process of hydrocarbons enriching from disperse state under the action of buoyancy, which enables most of the oil pools to be formed outside the source kitchens. The source rock does not necessarily have high abundance of organic matter, but has to have high efficiency and enough amount of hydrocarbon expulsion. The TOC threshold of source rocks for conventional oil accumulations is 0.5%, with the best TOC window ranging from 1% to 3%. The oil pools formed inside the source kitchens, mainly shale oil, are the retention of oil and gas in the source rock and there is no large-scale hydrocarbon migration and enrichment process happened, which requires better quality and bigger scale of source rocks. The threshold of TOC for medium to high maturity of shale oil is 2%, with the best range falling in 3%-5%. Medium to low mature shale oil resource has a TOC threshold of 6%, and the higher the better in particular. The most favorable kerogen for both high and low-mature shale oils is oil-prone type of I-II1. Carrying out source rock quality and classification evaluation and looking for large-scale and high-quality source rock enrichment areas are a scientific issue that must be paid attention to when exploration activity changes from out-of-source regions to in-source kitchen areas. The purpose is to provide theoretical guidance for the upcoming shale oil enrichment area selection, economic discovery and objective evaluation of resource potential.

Key words： conventional oil reservoirs; out-source accumulation; shale oil; in-source hydrocarbon residue; source kitchen differences; organic abundance; lacustrine; high-quality source rock

参考文献

[1] BROOKS J. Classic petroleum provinces[M]. London: Geological Society Publishing House, 1990.
[2] KLEMME H D, ULMISHEK G F. Effective petroleum source rocks of the world: Stratigraphic distribution and controlling depositional factors[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1991, 75: 1809-1851.
[3] PETERS K E. Guideline of evaluating petroleum source rock using programmed pyrolysis[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1986, 70(3): 318-329.
[4] KATZ B. Petroleum source rocks[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer- Verlag, 1995.
[5] 黄第藩, 李晋超, 周翥虹, 等. 陆相有机质演化与成烃机理[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1984.
HUANG Difan, LI Jinchao, ZHOU Zhuhong, et al. Evolution and hydrocarbon generation mechanism of nonmarine organic matters[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1984.
[6] 翟光明, 高维亮, 宋建国, 等. 中国石油地质志(卷一)[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1996.
ZHAI Guangming, GAO Weiliang, SONG Jianguo, et al. Petroleum geology of China (Vol 1)[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1996.
[7] 张水昌, 梁狄刚, 张大江. 关于古生界烃源岩有机质丰度的评价标准[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2002, 29(2): 8-12.
ZHANG Shuichang, LIANG Digang, ZHANG Dajiang. Evaluation criteria for Paleozoic effective hydrocarbon source rocks[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2002, 29(2): 8-12.
[8] ZUMBERGE J, HAROLD I, LOWELL W. Petroleum geochemistry of the Cenomanian-Turonian Eagle Ford oils of south Texas[C]//BREYER J A. The Eagle Ford Shale: A renaissance in US oil production. Tulsa: AAPG, 2016: 135-165.
[9] JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: Part 2: Shale-oil resource systems[C]//BREYER J A. Shale reservoirs: Giant resources for the 21st century. Tulsa: AAPG, 2012: 89-119.
[10] 赵文智, 胡素云, 侯连华. 页岩油地下原位转化的内涵与战略地位[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4): 537-545.
ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, HOU Lianhua. Connotation and strategic role of in-situ conversion processing of shale oil underground in the onshore China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4): 537-545.
[11] 赵文智, 胡素云, 侯连华, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1): 1-10.
ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, HOU Lianhua, et al. Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 1-10.
[12] 赵文智, 朱如凯, 胡素云, 等. 陆相富有机质页岩与泥岩的成藏差异及其在页岩油评价中的意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6): 1079-1089.
ZHAO Wenzhi, ZHU Rukai, HU Suyun, et al. Accumulation contribution differences between lacustrine organic-rich shales and mudstones and their significance in shale oil evaluation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6): 1079-1089.
[13] 张文正, 杨华, 杨奕华, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7优质烃源岩的岩石学、元素地球化学特征及发育环境[J]. 地球化学, 2008, 37(1): 59-64.
ZHANG Wenzheng, YANG Hua, YANG Yihua, et al. Petrology and element geochemistry and development environment of Yanchang Formation Chang-7 high quality source rocks in Ordos Basin[J]. Geochemica, 2008, 37(1): 59-64.
[14] 冯子辉, 霍秋立, 王雪, 等. 松辽盆地松科1井晚白垩世沉积地层有机地球化学研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(5): 181-191.
FENG Zihui, HUO Qiuli, WANG Xue, et al. Geochemical research on the Late Cretaceous strata of Well SK1 in Songliao Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2009, 16(5): 181-191.
[15] 张林晔, 孔祥星, 张春荣, 等. 济阳坳陷下第三系优质烃源岩的发育及其意义[J]. 地球化学, 2003, 32(1): 35-42.
ZHANG Linye, KONG Xiangxing, ZHANG Chunrong, et al. High-quality oil-prone source rocks in Jiyang Depression[J]. Geochemica, 2003, 32(1): 35-42.
[16] 苏爱国, 陈志勇, 梁狄刚, 等. 青藏高原油气形成: 柴达木盆地西部新生界[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2006.
SU Aiguo, CHEN Zhiyong, LIANG Digang, et al. Oil-gas formation in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau-Cenozoic of Western Qaidam, China[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2006.
[17] 张斌, 何媛媛, 陈琰, 等. 柴达木盆地西部咸化湖相优质烃源岩地球化学特征及成藏意义[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(10): 1158-1167.
ZHANG Bin, HE Yuanyuan, CHEN Yan, et al. Geochemical characterisitics and oil accumulation significance of the high quality saline lacustrine source rocks in the western Qaidam Basin, NW China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(10): 1158-1167.
[18] 王绪龙, 支东明, 王屿涛, 等. 准噶尔盆地烃源岩与油气地球化学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2013.
WANG Xulong, ZHI Dongming, WANG Yutao, et al. Source rokcs and oil-gas geochemistry in Junggar Basin[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2013.
[19] 陈建平, 陈建军, 倪云燕, 等. 酒泉盆地酒西坳陷油气成藏控制因素与有利勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(11): 1311-1330.
CHEN Jianping, CHEN Jianjun, NI Yunyan, et al. Controlling factors of petroleum accumulation and favorable exploration area in the Jiuxi Depression, Jiuquan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(11): 1311-1330.
[20] 匡立春, 唐勇, 雷德文, 等. 准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相云质岩致密油形成条件与勘探潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(6): 657-667.
KUANG Lichun, TANG Yong, LEI Dewen, et al. Formation conditions and exploration potential of tight oil in the Permian saline lacustrine dolomitic rock, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(6): 657-667.
[21] 付金华, 李士祥, 牛小兵, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7段页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5): 870-883.
FU Jinhua, LI Shixiang, NIU Xiaobing, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration of shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5): 870-883.
[22] 赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 陆相湖盆页岩层系基本地质特征与页岩油勘探突破: 以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段一亚段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(3): 361-372.
ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, PU Xiugang, et al. Geological characteristics of shale rock system and shale oil exploration breakthrough in a lacustrine basin: A case study from the Paleogene 1st sub-member of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(3): 361-372.
[23] 邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 1-12.
ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, JING Zhenhua. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1): 1-12.
[24] 赵文智, 王兆云, 张水昌, 等. 有机质“接力成气”模式的提出及其在勘探中的意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2005, 32(2): 1-7.
ZHAO Wenzhi, WANG Zhaoyun, ZHANG Shuichang, et al. Successive generation of natural gas from organic materials and its significance in future exploration[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2005, 32(2): 1-7.
[25] 赵文智, 王兆云, 王红军, 等. 再论有机质“接力成气”的内涵与意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38(2): 129-135.
ZHAO Wenzhi, WANG Zhaoyun, WANG Hongjun, et al. Further discussion on the connotation and significance of the natural gas relaying generation model from organic material[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(2): 129-135.
[26] JARVIE D M, HILL R J, TIM T E, et al. Unconventional shale gas systems: The Mississippian Barnett shale of North Central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale gas assessment[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4): 475-499.
[27] PETERS K E, WALTERS C C, MOLDOWAN J M. The biomarker guide (Vol 2): Biomarkers and isotopes in petroleum exploration and earth history[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[28] 冯子辉, 霍秋立, 王雪, 等. 青山口组一段烃源岩有机地球化学特征及古沉积环境[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2015, 34(4): 1-7.
FENG Zihui, HUO Qiuli, WANG Xue, et al. Organic geochemical characteristics and paleosedimentary environments of the source rocks in Member 1 of Qingshankou Formation[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2015, 34(4): 1-7.
[29] 杨华, 李士祥, 刘显阳. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(1): 1-11.
YANG Hua, LI Shixiang, LIU Xianyang. Characteristics and resource prospects of tight oil and shale oil in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1): 1-11.
[30] 支东明, 唐勇, 杨智峰, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷陆相页岩油地质特征与聚集机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 524-536.
ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, YANG Zhifeng, et al. Geological characteristics and accumulation mechanism of continental shale oil in Jimusaer Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 524-536.
[31] 王兆云, 赵文智, 王东良, 等. 分散液态烃裂解气资源评价方法[J]. 地质学报, 2016, 90(1): 68-79.
WANG Zhaoyun, ZHAO Wenzhi, WANG Dongliang, et al. Quantitative assessment of pyrolysis gas generated by dispersed liquid hydrocarbon[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016, 90(1): 68-79.
[32] 陈建平, 孙永革, 钟宁宁, 等. 地质条件下湖相烃源岩生排烃效率与模式[J]. 地质学报, 2014, 88(11): 2005-2032.
CHEN Jianping, SUN Yongge, ZHONG Ningning, et al. The efficiency and model of petroleum expulsion from the lacustrine source rocks within geological frame[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88(11): 2005-2032.
[33] 张文正, 杨华, 杨伟伟, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7湖相页岩油地质特征评价[J]. 地球化学, 2015, 44(5): 505-515.
ZHANG Wenzheng, YANG Hua, YANG Weiwei, et al. Assessment of geological characteristics of lacustrine shale oil reservoir in Chang 7 Member of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Geochimica, 2015, 44(5): 505-515.
[34] GUO Xiaowen, HE Sheng, LIU Keyu, et al. Quantitative estimation of overpressure caused by oil generation in petroliferous basins[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2011, 42(11): 1343-1350.
[35] WU Songtao, YANG Zhi, ZHAI Xiufen, et al. An experimental study of organic matter, minerals and porosity evolution in shales within high-temperature and high-pressure constraints[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 102: 377-390.
[36] WU Songtao, ZHU Rukai, YANG Zhi, et al. Distribution and characteristics of lacustrine tight oil reservoirs in China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2019, 178: 20-36.
[37] ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, ZHU Rukai. Geologic significance and optimization technique of sweet spots in unconventional shale systems[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2019, 178: 3-19.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

版权所有：《石油勘探与开发》编辑部；《石油勘探与开发（英文）》编辑部
地址：北京市海淀区学院路20号，中国石油勘探开发研究院数据中心605室　

京ICP备15044687号    技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司