石油勘探与开发 >

2021 , Vol. 48 >Issue 2: 266 - 278

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11698/PED.2021.02.04

油气勘探

济阳坳陷古近系致密储集层孔喉结构特征与分类评价

  • 王永诗 ,
  • 高阳 ,
  • 方正伟
展开
  • 1.中国石油化工股份有限公司胜利油田分公司,山东东营 257000;
    2.中国石油化工股份有限公司胜利油田分公司勘探开发研究院,山东东营 257015
王永诗（1964-）,男,山东邹平人,博士,中国石油化工股份有限公司教授级高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探研究和管理工作。地址：山东省东营市东营区济南路258号,中国石化胜利油田分公司,邮政编码：257000。E-mail：wangyongshi.slyt@sinopec.com

收稿日期: 2020-04-21

  修回日期: 2021-02-20

  网络出版日期: 2021-03-19

收起

Pore throat structure and classification of Paleogene tight reservoirs in Jiyang depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China

  • WANG Yongshi ,
  • GAO Yang ,
  • FANG Zhengwei
Expand
  • 1. Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying 257000, China;
    2. Exploration and Development Research Institute, Shengli Oilfield Company, Sinopec, Dongying 257015, China

Received date: 2020-04-21

  Revised date: 2021-02-20

  Online published: 2021-03-19

Fold

摘要

综合利用铸体薄片、常规压汞、恒速压汞、微纳米级CT扫描等资料,研究了济阳坳陷古近系致密砂岩和砂砾岩孔喉结构特征并进行类型划分。首先利用铸体薄片资料分析致密储集层物质组成和结构特征,然后利用常规压汞、恒速压汞和微米级CT扫描等测试手段研究致密储集层的孔喉结构特征,并对10个孔喉结构参数开展系统聚类分析,结合分类结果与试油成果,建立古近系致密储集层的分类方案。研究认为,济阳坳陷古近系致密储集层具有大孔微喉的特征,孔隙为微米级,喉道为次微米级—纳米级,孔喉半径比变化较大。致密储集层的渗透性受喉道半径控制,孔隙与喉道半径差别越小、孔喉分布均值性越好,渗透性越好。不经过压裂改造措施就能够产出工业油流的致密砂岩和致密砂砾岩的孔喉半径均值的下限分别为0.6 μm和0.8 μm,需要经过压裂改造措施后才能够产出工业油流的储集层孔喉半径均值为0.2~0.6 μm,孔喉半径均值小于0.2 μm的储集层为现有压裂改造措施条件下的无效储集层。由此对不同类型致密砂岩和砂砾岩储集层进行分类评价,在勘探评价中得到良好应用。图9表5参34

关键词： 孔喉结构; 致密储集层; 储集层评价; 古近系; 济阳坳陷; 渤海湾盆地

本文引用格式

王永诗 , 高阳 , 方正伟 . 济阳坳陷古近系致密储集层孔喉结构特征与分类评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021 , 48(2) : 266 -278 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2021.02.04

Abstract

The pore throat structure characteristics of Paleogene tight sandstone and sandy conglomerate in the Jiyang depression are studied using cast thin section, conventional mercury injection, constant rate mercury injection and micro CT scanning data, and a reservoir classification scheme based on pore throat structure parameters is established. The material composition and structural characteristics of tight reservoirs are analyzed by casting thin section data. The pore throat structure characteristics of tight reservoirs are studied by conventional mercury injection, constant rate mercury injection and micro CT scanning. Ten pore throat structure parameters are analyzed by cluster analysis. Based on the classification results and oil test results, the classification scheme of Paleogene tight reservoirs is established. The Paleogene tight reservoirs in the Jiyang depression have the characteristics of macropores and microthroats, with pores in micron scale, throats in nano-submicron scale, and wide variation of ratio of pore radius to throat radius. The permeability of the tight reservoir is controlled by throat radius, the smaller the difference between pore radius and throat radius, and the more uniform the pore throat size, the higher the permeability will be. The lower limits of average pore throat radius for the tight sandstone and tight sandy conglomerate to produce industrial oil flow without fracturing are 0.6 μm and 0.8 μm, respectively. Reservoirs that can produce industrial oil flow only after fracturing have an average pore-throat radius between 0.2-0.6 μm, and reservoirs with average pore throat radius less than 0.2 μm are ineffective reservoirs under the current fracturing techniques. Different types of tight sandstone and sandy conglomerate reservoirs are classified and evaluated, which are well applied in exploratory evaluation.

Key words： pore throat structure; tight reservoir; reservoir evaluation; Paleogene; Jiyang Depression; Bohai Bay Basin

参考文献

[1] 李国欣, 朱如凯. 中国石油非常规油气发展现状、挑战与关注问题[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 1-13.
LI Guoxin, ZHU Rukai.Progress, challenges and key issues of unconventional oil and gas development of CNPC[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2): 1-13.
[2] US Energy Information Administration. Annual energy outlook 2019 with projections to 2050[R]. Washington: US Energy Information Administration, 2019.
[3] 孙龙德, 邹才能, 贾爱林, 等. 中国致密油气发展特征与方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(6): 1015-1026.
SUN Longde, ZOU Caineng, JIA Ailin, et al.Development characteristics and orientation of tight oil and gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(6): 1015-1026.
[4] 王社教, 蔚远江, 郭秋麟, 等. 致密油资源评价新进展[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(6): 1095-1105.
WANG Shejiao, YU Yuanjiang, GUO Qiulin, et al.New advance in resources evaluation of tight oil[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(6): 1095-1105.
[5] GOULD T, MCGLADE C.Could tight oil go global?[R]. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2019.
[6] 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 石油学报致密油地质评价方法: GB/T 34906—2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
Standardization Administration.Geological evaluating methods for tight oil: GB/T 34906—2017[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2017.
[7] 贾承造, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等. 中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(3): 343-350.
JIA Chengzao, ZOU Caineng, LI Jianzhong, et al.Assessment criteria, main types, basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3): 343-350.
[8] 匡立春, 唐勇, 雷德文, 等. 准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相云质岩致密油形成条件与勘探潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(6): 657-667.
KUANG Lichun, TANG Yong, LEI Dewen, et al.Formation conditions and exploration potential of tight oil in Permian saline lacustrine dolomitic rock, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(6): 657-667.
[9] 付金华, 李士祥, 牛小兵, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7段页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5): 870-883.
FU Jinhua, LI Shixiang, NIU Xiaobing, et al.Geological characteristics and exploration of shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5): 870-883.
[10] 孙雨, 邓明, 马世忠, 等. 松辽盆地大安地区扶余油层致密砂岩油分布特征及控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(5): 589-597.
SUN Yu, DENG Ming, MA Shizhong, et al.Distribution and controlling factors of tight sandstone oil in Fuyu oil layers of Da’an area, Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(5): 589-597.
[11] 宋明水, 刘惠民, 王勇, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集规律认识与勘探实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(2): 225-235.
SONG Mingshui, LIU Huimin, WANG Yong, et al.Enrichment rules and exploration practices of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2): 225-235.
[12] 赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征: 以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1013-1029.
ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, PU Xiugang, et al.Favorable formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin: A case study of Member 2 of Kongdian formation in Cangdong sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(9): 1013-1029.
[13] 黄东, 杨光, 杨智, 等. 四川盆地致密油勘探开发新认识与发展潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1212-1221.
HUANG Dong, YANG Guang, YANG Zhi, et al.New understanding and development potential of tight oil exploration and development in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(8): 1212-1221.
[14] 邹才能, 杨智, 陶士振, 等. 纳米油气与源储共生型油气聚集[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(1): 13-26.
ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, TAO Shizhen, et al.Nano-hydrocarbon and the accumulation in coexisting source and reservoi[R][J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(1): 13-26.
[15] 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 苏玲, 等. 中国致密储层孔隙结构表征需注意的问题及未来发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(11): 1323-1336.
ZHU Rukai, WU Songtao, SU Ling, et al.Problems and future works of porous texture characterization of tight reservoirs in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(11): 1323-1336.
[16] 高阳, 王永诗, 李孝军, 等. 基于岩石孔喉结构的致密砂岩分类方法: 以济阳坳陷古近系为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(2): 32-41.
GAO Yang, WANG Yongshi, LI Xiaojun, et al.Classification method of tight sandstone based on pore throat structure: A case study of Paleogene in Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(2): 32-41.
[17] 邹敏, 夏东领, 庞雯, 等. 致密砂岩储层微观孔喉结构表征方法及其应用: 以鄂尔多斯盆地红河地区长8层为例[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 34(2): 46-53.
ZOU Min, XIA Dongling, PANG Wen, et al.Characterization method of micropore-throat structure of tight sandstone reservoir and its application: Taking Chang 8 reservoir of Honghe area, Southern Ordos Basin as an example[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 34(2): 46-53.
[18] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 张训华, 等. 基于孔喉结构建立致密砂岩储层评价方案: 以松南中央坳陷泉四段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1654-1667.
CAI Laixing, LU Shuangfang, ZHANG Xunhua, et al.Establishment of evaluation scheme of tight sandstone reservoirs based on pore throat: A case study on the 4th Member of Quantou formation at central depression of southern Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(6): 1654-1667.
[19] 操应长, 葸克来, 朱如凯, 等. 松辽盆地南部泉四段扶余油层致密砂岩储层微观孔喉结构特征[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(5): 7-16.
CAO Yingchang, XI Kelai, ZHU Rukai, et al.Microscopic pore throat characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs in Fuyu layer of the fourth member of Quantou Formation in southern Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2015, 39(5): 7-16.
[20] 张飞飞. 特低渗-致密砂岩孔喉结构特征、演化及其对物性的控制: 以松辽盆地北部下白垩统为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2018, 42(5): 54-62.
ZHANG Feifei.Characterization and evaluation of pore-throat structures in ultra-low permeability and tight sandstones and their impacts on petrophysical properties: A case study of the lower Cretaceous in northern Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2018, 42(5): 54-62.
[21] 杨正明, 赵新礼, 熊春生, 等. 致密油储层孔喉微观结构表征技术研究进展[J]. 科技导报, 2019, 37(5): 89-98.
YANG Zhengming, ZHAO Xinli, XIONG Chunsheng, et al.Research progress on microstructure characterization of pore throat for tight oil reservoirs[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2019, 37(5): 89-98.
[22] 李易霖. 致密砂岩储层微观孔喉结构精细表征: 以齐家地区高三、高四油层组为例[D]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2017.
LI Yilin.Tight sandstone reservoir microscopic pore throat structure fine characterization: With G3 and G4 of Gaotaizi Oil Layer in Qijia Area as an example[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2017.
[23] 杨正明, 马壮志, 肖前华, 等. 致密油藏岩芯全尺度孔喉测试方法及应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(3): 97-104.
YANG Zhengming, MA Zhuangzhi, XIAO Qianhua, et al.Method for all-scale pore throat measurements in tight reservoir cores and its application[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2018, 40(3): 97-104.
[24] 刘薇, 卢双舫, 王民, 等. 致密砂岩储集空间全孔喉直径表征及其意义: 以松辽盆地龙虎泡油田龙26外扩区为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2018, 42(6): 41-51.
LIU Wei, LU Shuangfang, WANG Min, et al.Overall pore characterization of tight sandstone reservoir space and its significance: A case study of the outer expansion area of Long 26 in Longhupao oilfield, Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2018, 42(6): 41-51.
[25] 肖佃师, 卢双舫, 陆正元, 等. 联合核磁共振和恒速压汞方法测定致密砂岩孔喉结构[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(6): 961-970.
XIAO Dianshi, LU Shuangfang, LU Zhengyuan, et al.Combining nuclear magnetic resonance and rate-controlled porosimetry to probe the pore-throat structure of tight sandstones[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(6): 961-970.
[26] 白斌, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 利用多尺度CT成像表征致密砂岩微观孔喉结构[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(3): 329-333.
BAI Bin, ZHU Rukai, WU Songtao, et al.Multi-scale method of Nano(Miro)-CT study on microscopic pore structure of tight sandstone of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(3): 329-333.
[27] HU Yong, GUO Changmin, XU Xuan, et al.Pore throat structure and flow characteristics of sandstone reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2015, 37(3): 390-393, 961.
[28] 韩文学, 高长海, 韩霞. 核磁共振及微、纳米CT技术在致密储层研究中的应用: 以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2015, 22(1): 62-66.
HAN Wenxue, GAO Changhai, HAN Xia.Application of NMR and micrometer and nanometer CT technology in research of tight eservoir: Taking Chang 7 Member in Ordos Basin as an example[J]. Fault-block oil & gas field, 2015, 22(1): 62-66.
[29] 张代燕. 吉木萨尔凹陷致密油储层孔隙结构特征研究[J]. 新疆地质, 2017, 35(1): 70-73.
ZHANG Daiyan.The research of pore throat characteristics of tight reservoir in Jimusar Sag[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2017, 35(1): 70-73.
[30] 安详, 王殿生, 向李平, 等. 致密油储层岩石孔隙结构特征的聚类分析: 以吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组储层为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2016, 6(4): 7-13.
AN Xiang, WANG Diansheng, XIANG Liping, et al.Cluster analysis of pore structure characteristics of tight oil reservoir: A case study in Lucaogou formation of Jimusar Sag[J]. Reservoir Evalution and Development, 2016, 6(4): 7-13.
[31] 陈犁. 致密油储层类型划分方法研究: 以大情字井地区青一段储层为例[D]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2017.
CHEN Li.Study on division method of tight reservoir: Taking the reservoir in Qn1 in area of Daqingzi well for example[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an Shiyou University, 2017.
[32] 孙瑛莹. 基于压汞实验资料研究低渗透储层微观特征: 以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长81储层为例[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2017, 31(5): 84-87.
SUN Yingying.Micro-characteristics of low permeability reservoir based on mercury injection experiment: A case study of Chang 7 reservoir in Longdong area, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2017, 31(5): 84-87.
[33] 徐永强, 何永宏, 卜广平, 等. 基于微观孔喉结构及渗流特征建立致密储层分类评价标准[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(3): 451-460.
XU Yongqiang, HE Yonghong, BU Guangping, et al.Establishment of classification and evaluation criteria for tight reservoirs based on characteristics of microscopic pore throat structure and percolation[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2019, 41(3): 451-460.
[34] 唐红娇, 杨立辉, 朱峰, 等. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油分子尺寸及结构特征[J]. 地球科学, 2018, 43(5): 1587-1593.
TANG Hongjiao, YANG Lihui, ZHU Feng, et al.Molecular size and structure characteristics of tight oil of Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Depression[J]. Earth Science, 2018, 43(5): 1587-1593.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

版权所有：《石油勘探与开发》编辑部；《石油勘探与开发（英文）》编辑部
地址：北京市海淀区学院路20号，中国石油勘探开发研究院数据中心605室　

京ICP备15044687号    技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司