油气勘探

不同裂缝条件下斯通利波幅度衰减实验

  • 李宁 ,
  • 王克文 ,
  • 刘鹏 ,
  • 武宏亮 ,
  • 冯周 ,
  • 范华军 ,
  • SMEULDERS David
展开
  • 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083;
    2.中国石油大学(北京)地球物理学院,北京 102249;
    3.埃因霍温理工大学,埃因霍温 5600MB,荷兰
李宁(1958-),男,北京市人,博士,中国工程院院士,中国石油勘探开发研究院教授级高级工程师,主要从事测井理论方法和处理软件研究工作。地址:北京市海淀区学院路20号,中国石油勘探开发研究院,邮政编码:100083。E-mail:ln@petrochina.com.cn

收稿日期: 2020-06-24

  修回日期: 2021-01-30

  网络出版日期: 2021-03-19

基金资助

中国石油“十三五”测井基础研究项目“储层基质-裂缝组合渗透率测井计算新方法研究”(2019A-3609)

Experimental study on attenuation of Stoneley wave under different fracture factors

  • LI Ning ,
  • WANG Kewen ,
  • LIU Peng ,
  • WU Hongliang ,
  • FENG Zhou ,
  • FAN Huajun ,
  • SMEULDERS David
Expand
  • 1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. College of Geophysics, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    3. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 5600 MB, the Netherlands

Received date: 2020-06-24

  Revised date: 2021-01-30

  Online published: 2021-03-19

摘要

为了定量确定裂缝宽度、倾角、延伸长度及填充物等不同因素对斯通利波幅度衰减的影响,将原先岩心样品固定、中部钻孔移动探头的激波管斯通利波测量方法,改进为岩心样品不钻孔垂直升降、沿激波管管壁固定分置多探头的测量方法进行实验分析。通过对斯通利波信号进行时间校正和幅度校正,有效改善了斯通利波首波信噪比,提高了测量精度。同时,利用全直径碳酸盐岩岩心,针对此测量方法加工了21组裂缝参数相异(裂缝宽度为毫米级)的岩心模型,并定义相对幅度表征斯通利波衰减。实验结果表明,斯通利波相对幅度随裂缝宽度增加呈指数衰减、随裂缝倾角增加线性降低、随裂缝深度增大呈指数衰减、随填充物渗透率增加而降低。在上述4种情况中,裂缝宽度对斯通利波幅度衰减的影响最大,其次是裂缝延伸长度和填充物渗透率,最后是裂缝倾角。图11表2参20

本文引用格式

李宁 , 王克文 , 刘鹏 , 武宏亮 , 冯周 , 范华军 , SMEULDERS David . 不同裂缝条件下斯通利波幅度衰减实验[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021 , 48(2) : 258 -265 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2021.02.03

Abstract

To quantitatively determine the effect of different factors such as fracture width, dip angle, extension and filling material on Stoneley wave amplitude decreasing, the shock tube experiment method was changed from fixing the sample and vertically moving the sensor in the borehole to fixing the sensors along the shock tube wall and vertically moving the sample without drilling the borehole in it. The measurement accuracy and the signal-to-noise ratio of the first Stoneley wave were improved by the time corrections and amplitude corrections of Stoneley wave signals. At the same time, 21 sets of core models with different fracture parameters were processed for this measurement method by using full-diameter carbonate core, and relative amplitudes were defined to characterize Stoneley wave amplitude decreasing. The experimental results show that the relative amplitude of Stoneley wave exponentially decreases with increasing fracture width. The relative amplitude of Stoneley wave linearly decreases with increasing fracture dip angle. The relative amplitude of Stoneley wave exponentially decreases with increasing fracture extension. The relative amplitude of Stoneley wave decreases with increasing the permeability of filling material in the fracture. Under the above four conditions, the fracture width has the greatest effect on the decreasing of Stoneley wave amplitude, followed by the fracture extension and the permeability of filling material, and finally the fracture dip angle.

参考文献

[1] 李宁. 中国海相碳酸盐岩测井解释概论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.
LI Ning.Well logging interpretation outline of carbonate reservoir in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013.
[2] 谢芳, 张承森, 刘瑞林, 等. 碳酸盐岩缝洞储集层电成像测井产量预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(2): 349-356.
XIE Fang, ZHANG Chengsen, LIU Ruilin, et al.Production prediction for fracture-vug carbonate reservoirs using electric imaging logging data[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(2): 349-356.
[3] 王蓓, 刘向君, 司马立强. 四川盆地磨溪地区寒武系龙王庙组缝洞型储集层分级评价及预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(2): 290-301.
WANG Bei, LIU Xiangjun, SIMA Liqiang.Grading evaluation and prediction of fracture-cavity reservoirs in Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation of Moxi Area, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(2): 290-301.
[4] 李宁, 王克文, 张宫, 等. 应用CT分析及核磁测井预测碳酸盐岩产气量[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(2): 150-157.
LI Ning, WANG Kewen, ZHANG Gong, et al.Prediction of gas production in carbonates based on CT analysis and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(2): 150-157.
[5] SIBBIT A M, FAIVRE Q.The dual laterolog response in fractured rocks[R]. Dallas, Texas: SPWLA 26th Annual Logging Symposium, 1985.
[6] 葛新民, 范宜仁, 李军, 等. 井旁裂缝的双侧向测井物理模拟及特征分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2019, 62(1): 354-360.
GE Xinmin, FAN Yiren, LI Jun, et al.Experimental studies and investigations on the dual lateral log response of near borehole fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2019, 62(1): 354-360.
[7] 南泽宇, 李军, 贾丽华, 等. 低阻碳酸盐岩储层双侧向裂缝响应模拟及定量评价[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(5): 2224-2230.
NAN Zeyu, LI Jun, JIA Lihua, et al.Simulation and quantitative evaluation of dul-laterolog responces of fracture in low resistivity carbonate reservoir[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(5): 2224-2230.
[8] 张兆辉, 杜社宽, 陈华勇, 等. 基于电成像测井的火山岩裂缝分布定量表征: 以准噶尔盆地滴西地区石炭系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(10): 1130-1140.
ZHANG Zhaohui, DU Shekuan, CHEN Huayong, et al.Quantitative characterization of volcanic fracture distribution based on electrical imaging logging: A case study of Carboniferous in Dixi Area, Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(10): 1130-1140.
[9] 屈海洲, 张福祥, 王振宇, 等. 基于岩心-电成像测井的裂缝定量表征方法: 以库车坳陷ks2区块白垩系巴什基奇克组砂岩为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(3): 425-432.
QU Haizhou, ZHANG Fuxiang, WANG Zhenyu, et al.Quantitative fracture evaluation method based on core-image logging: A case study of Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in KS2 well area, Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(3): 425-432.
[10] 刘瑞林, 谢芳, 肖承文, 等. 基于小波变换图像分割技术的电成像测井资料裂缝、孔洞面孔率提取方法[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017, 60(12): 4945-4955.
LIU Ruilin, XIE Fang, XIAO Chengwen, et al.Extracting fracture-vug plane porosity from electrical imaging logging data using dissection of wavelet-transform-based image[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2017, 60(12): 4945-4955.
[11] 李宁. 纵、横波首波相位关系实验现象的解释及其对全波测井的意义[J]. 地球物理测井, 1989, 13(4): 14-20.
LI Ning.Interpretation of the experimental phenomena about the P and S head wave phase relations, and its significance to full wave logging[J]. Geophysical Well Logging, 1989, 13(4): 14-20.
[12] HORNBY B E, JOHNSON D L, WINKLER K W, et al.Fracture evaluation using reflected Stoneley-wave arrivals[J]. Geophysics, 1989, 54(10): 1274-1288.
[13] KOSTEK S, JOHNSAON D L, RANDALL C J.The interaction of tube waves with borehole fractures, Part I: Numerical models[J]. Geophysics, 1998, 63(3): 800-808.
[14] KOSTEK S, JOHNSAON D L, WINKELER K W, et al.The interaction of tube waves with borehole fractures, Part II: Analytical models[J]. Geophysics, 1998, 63(3): 809-815.
[15] TANG X M, CHENG C H.Quantitative borehole acoustic methods[M]. San Diego: Elsevier, 2004.
[16] TANG X M, CHENG C H.Fast inversion of formation permeability from Stoneley wave logs using a simplified Biot Rosenbaum Model[J]. Geophysics, 1996, 61(3): 639-645.
[17] CHAO G E, SMEULDERS D M J, VAN DONGEN M E H. Measurement of shock-induced guided and surface acoustic waves along boreholes in poroelastic materials[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2006, 99(9): 094904-1-094904-6.
[18] SMEULDERS D M J, VAN DONGEN M E H. Wave propagation in porous media containing a dilute gas-liquid mixture: Theory and experiments[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanism, 1997, 343: 351-373.
[19] FAN H J, SMEULDERS D M J. Shock-induced borehole waves and fracture effects[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2012, 93(2): 263-270.
[20] LI Ning, WANG Kewen, WU Hongliang, et al.Shock-induced Stoneley waves in carbonate rock samples[J]. Geophysics, 2019, 84(5): D2009-D2016.
文章导航

/