油气勘探

陆相富有机质页岩与泥岩的成藏差异及其在页岩油评价中的意义

  • 赵文智 ,
  • 朱如凯 ,
  • 胡素云 ,
  • 侯连华 ,
  • 吴松涛
展开
  • 中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
赵文智(1958-),男,河北昌黎人,博士,中国石油勘探开发研究院教授级高级工程师,中国工程院院士,主要从事石油天然气地质综合研究和科研管理工作。地址:北京市海淀区学院路20号,中国石油勘探开发研究院,邮政编码:100083。E-mail: zwz@petrochina.com.cn

收稿日期: 2020-03-05

  修回日期: 2020-11-04

  网络出版日期: 2020-11-27

基金资助

国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05046、2017ZX05001); 中国石油天然气股份有限公司项目(2019E-2601)

Accumulation contribution differences between lacustrine organic-rich shales and mudstones and their significance in shale oil evaluation

  • ZHAO Wenzhi ,
  • ZHU Rukai ,
  • HU Suyun ,
  • HOU Lianhua ,
  • WU Songtao
Expand
  • PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China

Received date: 2020-03-05

  Revised date: 2020-11-04

  Online published: 2020-11-27

摘要

页岩和泥岩的有机质丰度与岩石组构差异较大,决定了二者对常规油气与页岩油气成藏贡献的不同,未来进入源灶区勘探后所倚重的烃源岩评价标准也应有别。页岩沉积于半深湖-深湖环境,沉积速率低并伴有程度不等的化学沉积作用;泥岩多形成于滨-浅湖环境,沉积速率快且多具密度流特征。火山灰沉落与热液注入导致“肥沃效应”、放射性物质促使生物超量超速生长、深水厌氧环境与低沉积速率保护有机物堆积不被稀释等因素促使页岩段有机物富集。页理易剥离成为储集空间,生烃产生的酸性水溶蚀部分颗粒形成增孔效应;泥岩呈块状,黏土矿物含量高,基质孔隙不发育。页岩段总有机碳含量高,页理发育,储集性相对较好,脆性矿物含量相对较高,是页岩油勘探开发最有利的岩相类型。开展页岩与泥岩成藏差异研究,以页岩、泥岩为端元,落实资源分布,确定“甜点”评价参数类型和标准,优选页理发育的“甜点区/段”,使用有效开发技术,对客观评价页岩油资源总量、经济性与规模有效开发都具重要意义。图7表2参42

本文引用格式

赵文智 , 朱如凯 , 胡素云 , 侯连华 , 吴松涛 . 陆相富有机质页岩与泥岩的成藏差异及其在页岩油评价中的意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020 , 47(6) : 1079 -1089 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2020.06.02

Abstract

Shales and mudstones differ greatly in organic matter abundance and rock fabric, resulting in their different roles in the formation of conventional and shale oil/gas reservoirs. The evaluation criteria of source rocks are different in the future exploration in self-sourced petroleum systems. Shales are deposited in deep/semi-deep lacustrine at a low deposition rate accompanied with chemical depositions of various degrees, while mudstones are mostly formed in shallow lacustrine/lakeside at a high deposition rate, showing characteristics of density flow. Three factors contribute to the enrichment of organic matter in shales, including the "fertile effect" caused by volcanic ash settling and hydrothermal injection, excessive and over-speed growth of organisms promoted by radioactive materials, and low dilution of organic matter in deep water anaerobic environment where the deposition rate is low. Lamellations in shales tend to be separated to form new storage space, and acid water generated during hydrocarbon generation can dissolve some particles to generate new pores. The massive mudstones with high clay content are of poor matrix porosity. Shales with high total organic carbon, developed laminations, relative good reservoir property, and high brittle mineral content, are the most favorable lithofacies for shale oil exploration and development. It is urgent to carry out investigation on the differences between shale and mudstone accumulation, to identify resources distribution in shale and mudstone formations, determine key parameters and standards for “sweet-spot” evaluation, select “sweet-spot areas/ sections”, and adopt effective development technologies. All of these are of great significance for the assessment of shale oil resources and economically and effectively exploitation of shale oil.

参考文献

[1] U S Energy Information Administration. Annual energy outlook 2019 with projections to 2050[R]. Washington: U S Energy Information Administration, 2019.
[2] 赵文智, 胡素云, 侯连华, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1): 1-10.
ZHAO Wenzhi, HU Suyun, HOU Lianhua, et al. Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 1-10.
[3] 金之钧, 白振瑞, 高波, 等. 中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗?[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 451-458.
JIN Zhijun, BAI Zhenrui, GAO Bo, et al. Has China ushered in the shale oil and gas revolution?[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 451-458.
[4] 邹才能, 杨智, 王红岩, 等. “进源找油”: 论四川盆地非常规陆相大型页岩油气田[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(7): 1551-1562.
ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, WANG Hongyan, et al. “Exploration petroleum inside source kitchen”: Jurassic unconvetional continental giant shale oil & gas field in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(7): 1551-1562.
[5] 邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 1-12.
ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, JING Zhenhua. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1): 1-12.
[6] 杜金虎, 胡素云, 庞正炼, 等. 中国陆相页岩油类型、潜力及前景[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 560-568.
DU Jinhu, HU Suyun, PANG Zhenglian, et al. The types, potentials and prospects of continental shale oil in China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(5): 560-568.
[7] 李国欣, 朱如凯. 中国石油非常规油气发展现状、挑战与关注问题[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2): 1-13.
LI Guoxin, ZHU Rukai. Progress, challenges and key issues of unconventional oil and gas development of CNPC[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2): 1-13.
[8] 宋国奇, 徐兴友, 李政, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系陆相页岩油产量的影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(3): 463-471.
SONG Guoqi, XU Xingyou, LI Zheng, et al. Factors controlling oil production from Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang depression[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2015, 36(3): 463-471.
[9] 赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 等. 陆相湖盆页岩层系基本地质特征与页岩油勘探突破: 以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段一亚段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(3): 361-372.
ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHOU Lihong, PU Xiugang, et al. Geological characteristics of shale rock system and shale oil exploration breakthrough in a lacustrine basin: A case study from the Paleogene 1st sub-member of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(3): 361-372.
[10] 付金华, 李士祥, 侯雨庭, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段Ⅱ类页岩油风险勘探突破及其意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(1): 78-92.
FU Jinhua, LI Shixiang, HOU Yuting, et al. Breakthrough and significance of the type Ⅱ shale oil risky exploration of Chang 7 of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin, China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(1): 78-92.
[11] 杨华, 牛小兵, 徐黎明, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7段页岩油勘探潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(4): 590-599.
YANG Hua, NIU Xiaobing, XU Liming, et al. Exploration potential of shale oil in Chang 7 Member, Upper Triassic Yangchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(4): 590-599.
[12] CUI J W, ZHU R K, MAO Z G, et al. Accumulation of unconventional petroleum resources and their coexistence characteristics in Chang 7 shale formations of Ordos Basin in central China[J]. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2019, 13(3): 575-587.
[13] 张文正, 杨华, 杨伟伟, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7湖相页岩油地质特征评价[J]. 地球化学, 2015, 44(5): 505-515.
ZHANG Wenzheng, YANG Hua, YANG Weiwei, et al. Assessment of geological characteristics of lacustrine shale oil reservoir in Chang 7 Member of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Geochimica, 2015, 44(5): 505-515.
[14] 孙建博, 孙兵华, 赵谦平, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区延长组长7湖相页岩油地质特征及勘探潜力评价[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(6): 29-37.
SUN Jianbo, SUN Binghua, ZHAO Qianping, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration potential evaluation of Chang 7 lacustrine shale oil in Yanchang Formation, Fuxian area, Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23(6): 29-37.
[15] 林森虎, 袁选俊, 杨智, 等. 陆相页岩与泥岩特征对比及其意义: 以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 517-523.
LIN Senhu, YUAN Xuanjun, YANG Zhi, et al. Comparative study on lacustrine shale and mudstone and its significance: A case from 7 Member of Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2017, 38(3): 517-523.
[16] 袁选俊, 林森虎, 刘群, 等. 湖盆细粒沉积特征与富有机质页岩分布模式: 以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7油层组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(1): 34-43.
YUAN Xuanjun, LIN Senhu, LIU Qun, et al. Lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary features and organic-rich shale distribution pattern: A case study of Chang 7 Member of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(1): 34-43.
[17] 刘群, 袁选俊, 林森虎, 等. 湖相泥岩、页岩的沉积环境和特征对比: 以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(3): 531-540.
LIU Qun, YUAN Xuanjun, LIN Senhu, et al. Depositional environment and characteristic comparison between lacustrine mudstone and shale: A case study from the Chang 7 Member of the Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(3): 531-540.
[18] 柳波, 石佳欣, 付晓飞, 等. 陆相泥页岩层系岩相特征与页岩油富集条件: 以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段富有机质泥页岩为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5): 828-838.
LIU Bo, SHI Jiaxin, FU Xiaofei, et al. Petrological characteristics and shale oil enrichment of lacustrine fine - grained sedimentary system: A case study of organic-rich shale in first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag, Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5): 828-838.
[19] 刘惠民, 于炳松, 谢忠怀, 等. 陆相湖盆富有机质页岩微相特征及对页岩油富集的指示意义: 以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(12): 1328-1343.
LIU Huimin, YU Bingsong, XIE Zhonghuai, et al. Characteristics and implications of micro-lithofacies in lacustrine-basin organic-rich shale: A case study of Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(12): 1328-1343.
[20] 李明诚. 油气运移研究的现状与发展[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1994, 21(2): 1-6.
LI Mingcheng. Present status of hydrocarbons migration research and its development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1994, 21(2): 1-6.
[21] 柳广弟. 石油地质学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2009: 184-185.
LIU Guangdi. Petroleum geology[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2009: 184-185.
[22] LI S, ZHU R K, CUI J W, et al. The petrological characteristics and significance of organic-rich shale in the Chang 7 Member of the Yanchang Formation, south margin of the Ordos Basin, central China[J]. Petroleum Science, 2019, 16: 1255-1269.
[23] 齐玉林, 张枝焕, 夏东领, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部长7暗色泥岩与黑色页岩生烃动力学特征对比分析[J]. 现代地质, 2019, 33(4): 863-871.
QI Yulin, ZHANG Zhihuan, XIA Dongling, et al. Comparative analysis of hydrocarbon generation kinetics of dark shale and black shale of Chang 7 in Southern Ordos Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(4): 863-871.
[24] LEE C T, JIANG H, RONAY E, et al. Volcanic ash as a driver of enhanced organic carbon burial in the Cretaceous[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1): 1-9.
[25] 张文正, 杨华, 彭平安, 等. 晚三叠世火山活动对鄂尔多斯盆地长7优质烃源岩发育的影响[J]. 地球化学, 2009, 38(6): 573-582.
ZHANG Wenzheng, YANG Hua, PENG Ping'an, et al. The influence of late Triassic volcanism on the development of Chang 7 high grade hydrocarbon source rock in Ordos Basin[J]. Geochimica, 2009, 38(6): 573-582.
[26] ZHANG W Z, YANG H, XIA X, et al. Triassic chrysophyte cyst fossils discovered in the Ordos Basin, China[J]. Geology, 2016, 44(12): 1031-1034.
[27] WANG H J, ZHAO W Z, CAI Y W, et al. Oil generation from the immature organic matter after artificial neutron irradiation[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(2): 1276-1287.
[28] 秦艳, 张文正, 彭平安, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7段富铀烃源岩的铀赋存状态与富集机理[J]. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(10): 2469-2476.
QIN Yan, ZHANG Wenzheng, PENG Ping'an, et al. Occurrence and concentration of uranium in the hydrocarbon source rocks of Chang 7 Member of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2009, 25(10): 2469-2476.
[29] 马奎, 胡素云, 王铜山. 生烃母质繁盛条件实验研究及其油气地质意义[J]. 微体古生物学报, 2018, 35(3): 322-328.
MA Kui, HU Suyun, WANG Tongshan. Experimental study on the prosperous condition of the hydrocarbon generation and its significance on oil-gas geology[J]. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica, 2018, 35(3): 322-328.
[30] LIN L H, WANG P L, RUMBLE D, et al. Long-term sustainability of a high-energy, low-diversity crustal biome[J]. Science, 2006, 314(5798): 479-482.
[31] 毛光周, 刘池洋, 刘宝泉, 等. 铀对(Ⅰ型)低熟烃源岩生烃演化的影响[J]. 中国石油大学学报, 2012, 36(2): 172-181.
MAO Guangzhou, LIU Chiyang, LIU Baoquan, et al. Effects of uranium on hydrocarbon generation of low-mature hydrocarbon source rocks containing kerogen typeⅠ[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2012, 36(2): 172-181.
[32] 毛光周, 刘池洋, 张东东, 等. 铀对(Ⅱ型)低熟烃源岩生烃演化的影响[J]. 地质学报, 2012, 86(11): 1833-1840.
MAO Guangzhou, LIU Chiyang, ZHANG Dongdong, et al. Effects of uranium (typeⅡ) on evolution of hydrocarbon generation of source rocks[J]. Acta Geologica Sinca, 2012, 86(11): 1833-1840.
[33] 毛光周, 刘池洋, 张东东, 等. 铀在Ⅲ型烃源岩生烃演化中作用的实验研究[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2014, 44(8): 1740-1750.
MAO Guangzhou, LIU Chiyang, ZHANG Dongdong, et al. Effects of uranium on hydrocarbon generation of hydrocarbon source rocks with type-Ⅲ kerogen[J]. SCIENCE CHINA Earth Sciences, 2014, 57(8): 1168-1179.
[34] ZHU Rukai, CUI Jingwei, DENG Shenghui, et al. High-precision dating and geological significance of Chang 7 tuff zircon of the Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin in central China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(6): 1823-1834.
[35] WU H, ZHANG S, HINNOV L A, et al. Cyclostratigraphy and orbital tuning of the terrestrial upper Santonian-Lower Danian in Songliao Basin, northeastern China[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2014, 407: 82-95.
[36] OLSEN P E. A 40-million-year lake record of early Mesozoic orbital climatic forcing[J]. Science, 1986, 234(1997): 842-848.
[37] 宋明水. 济阳坳陷页岩油勘探实践与现状[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 1-12.
SONG Mingshui. Practice and current status of shale oil exploration in Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 1-12.
[38] 梁世君, 黄志龙, 柳波, 等. 马朗凹陷芦草沟组页岩油形成机理与富集条件[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(4): 588-594.
LIANG Shijun, HUANG Zhilong, LIU Bo, et al. Formation mechanism and enrichment conditions of Lucaogou Formation shale oil from Malang Sag, Santanghu Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(4): 588-594.
[39] 吕明久, 付代国, 何斌, 等. 泌阳凹陷深凹区页岩油勘探实践[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2012, 26(3): 85-87.
LYU Mingjiu, FU Daiguo, HE Bin, et al. Exploration practice of shale oil in deep sag area Biyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2012, 26(3): 85-87.
[40] 郭旭光, 何文军, 杨森, 等. 准噶尔盆地页岩油“甜点区”评价与关键技术应用: 以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1168-1179.
GUO Xuguang, HE Wenjun, YANG Sen, et al. Valuation and application of key technologies of “sweet area” of shale oil in Junggar Basin: Case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Depression[J]. Natural gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(8): 1168-1179.
[41] 蒲秀刚, 时战楠, 韩文中, 等. 陆相湖盆细粒沉积区页岩层系石油地质特征与油气发现: 以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 46-58.
PU Xiugang, SHI Zhannan, HAN Wenzhong, et al. Petroleum geological characteristics and hydrocarbon discovery of shale system in fine-grained sedimentary area of lacustrine basin: A case study of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong Sag, Huanghua Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 46-58.
[42] 支东明, 唐勇, 杨智峰, 等. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷陆相页岩油地质特征与聚集机理[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 524-536.
ZHI Dongming, TANG Yong, YANG Zhifeng, et al. Geological characteristics and accumulation mechanism of continental shale oil in Jimusaer Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2019, 40(3): 524-536.
文章导航

/