油气田开发

页岩油气成功开发的关键技术、先进理念与重要启示——以加拿大都沃内项目为例

  • 李国欣 ,
  • 罗凯 ,
  • 石德勤
展开
  • 1.中国石油勘探与生产分公司,北京 100007;
    2.中国石油天然气集团有限公司科技管理部,北京 100007;
    3.中国石油集团油田技术服务有限公司,北京 100007
李国欣(1971-),男,山西忻州人,硕士,中国石油勘探与生产分公司高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探管理与综合地质研究工作。地址:北京市东城区东直门北大街9号,石油大厦中国石油勘探与生产分公司,邮政编码:100007。E-mail:guoxinli@petrochina.com.cn

收稿日期: 2020-02-17

  修回日期: 2020-06-23

  网络出版日期: 2020-07-20

基金资助

政府间国际科技创新合作重点专项“能源与水纽带关系及高效绿色利用关键技术”(2016YFE0102400); 中国工程院咨询项目“中国西部地区化石能源与水资源协同发展战略研究”(2019-XZ-33)

Key technologies, engineering management and important suggestions of shale oil/gas development: Case study of a Duvernay shale project in Western Canada Sedimentary Basin

  • LI Guoxin ,
  • LUO Kai ,
  • SHI Deqin
Expand
  • 1. PetroChina Exploration & Production Company, Beijing 100007, China;
    2. CNPC S & T Department, Beijing 100007, China;
    3. CNPC Oilfield Service Company Limited, Beijing 100007, China

Received date: 2020-02-17

  Revised date: 2020-06-23

  Online published: 2020-07-20

摘要

以加拿大都沃内项目为例,总结北美地区页岩油开发的先进技术和工程管理模式,并提出加快国内陆相页岩油商业化开发的初步建议。介绍了项目地质选区评价、长水平段快速钻完井、密切割压裂、井距优化等领域的先进技术、宝贵认识及丰富经验。对北美非常规资源项目全生命周期管理的理念和内涵进行了分析,其对前期评价的重视及风险管控,高度竞争的市场环境对技术创新和管理创新的重要推动作用,以及全行业知识、经验的低成本共享制度及管理模式,都对国内加快非常规资源勘探开发具有重要的启示和借鉴意义。中国页岩油气资源丰富,是保障国家油气能源供给的重要接替领域,但由于起步较晚以及特殊的地质特点和工程难点,无论是技术水平还是管理模式与北美相比都存在较大差距,根据北美页岩油气开发的先进经验及启示,提出了加快中国页岩油气发展的初步建议。图18参39

本文引用格式

李国欣 , 罗凯 , 石德勤 . 页岩油气成功开发的关键技术、先进理念与重要启示——以加拿大都沃内项目为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020 , 47(4) : 739 -749 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2020.04.10

Abstract

The Duvernay project in Canada was taken as an example to summarize the advanced technology and engineering management model of shale oil development in North America. Preliminary suggestions were put forward to accelerate the commercial development of domestic continental shale oil. The advanced technologies, valuable knowledge and rich experience were introduced, including the evaluation of geological target area of the project, rapid long horizontal drilling and completion, high-intensity fracturing, and well spacing optimization. In particular, the concept and connotation of the full life cycle management of North American unconventional resource projects were analyzed. Its emphasis on early evaluation and risk management, and a highly competitive market environment have played an important role in promoting technological innovation and management innovation. In addition, the low-cost sharing system of industry-wide knowledge and experience and the management mode were applied. These management approaches are of great significance for reference in accelerating the exploration and development of unconventional resources in China. China possesses abundant shale oil and gas resources, which are an important replacement to guarantee the national oil and gas energy supply. However, due to the late start and special geological characteristics and engineering difficulties in China, there is a large gap in technology level and management mode compared with North America. According to the advanced experience and enlightenment of the shale oil and gas development in North America, a preliminary proposal to accelerate the development of shale oil and gas in China was made.

参考文献

[1] International Energy Agency.World energy outlook 2019[M]. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2019.
[2] U.S.Energy Information Administration. International energy outlook 2019 with projections to 2050[M]. Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2020.
[3] 中国石油经济技术研究院. 2019年国内外油气行业发展报告[M]. 北京: 中国石油经济技术研究院, 2020.
CNPC Economics & Technology Research Institute. Report on oil & gas energy development 2019[M]. Beijing: CNPC Economics & Technology Research Institute, 2020.
[4] 焦方正. 推进中国陆相页岩油革命[R]. 北京: 中国陆相页岩油科技发展及战略研讨会, 2018.
JIAO Fangzheng.Pushing revolution of nonmarine sedimentary shale oil in China[R]. Beijing: R&D Progress and Strategy Discussion on Nonmarine Sedimentary Shale Oil in China, 2018.
[5] 匡立春. 中国陆相页岩油气革命[R]. 北京: 2019能源战略与创新发展高峰论坛, 2019.
KUANG Lichun.Revolution of nonmarine sedimentary shale hydrocarbon resources in China[R]. Beijing: 2019 Peak Forum on Energy Strategy and Innovation Development, 2019.
[6] WEIJERS L, WRIGHT C, MAYERHOFER M, et al.Trends in the North American frac industry: Invention through the shale revolution[R]. SPE 194345-MS, 2019.
[7] ZBOROWSKI M.Exploring the innovative evolution of hydraulic fracturing[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2019, 71(7): 39-41.
[8] SRINIVASAN K, KRISHNAMURTHY J, BORCHARDT S.Surviving the new oil price landscape: A case study breaking down liquid-rich basins in the Rockies[R]. SPE 190021-MS, 2018.
[9] ALIMAHOMED F, WIGGER E, DROUILLARD M, et al.Impact of pore pressure on modeled hydraulic fracture geometry and well spacing in the East Duvernay Shale Basin, Canada[R]. URTEC 2019-516, 2019.
[10] KLEINER S, ANIEKWE O.The Duvernay shale completion journey[R]. SPE 198070-MS, 2019.
[11] THORSON A M, ATCHLEY S C, WEISSENBERGER J A W, et al. Stratigraphic partitioning and distribution of reservoir attributes within the late Devonian Duvernay formation, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin[R]. URTEC 2019-953, 2019.
[12] BRAUN D, GURDEN C, YANG W, et al.Development best practices in the Duvernay liquid rich shale: Early stage sensitivity analyses and comparative economics for decision making[R]. SPE 174855, 2015.
[13] COTE A, CAMERON N, GRUNBERG D.When is there too much fracture intensity?[R]. SPE 195895-MS, 2019.
[14] JACOBS T.To “right size” fractures, producers adopt robust monitoring and custom completions[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2019, 71(9): 38-46.
[15] MOHAMED M I, SALAH M, IBRAHIM M, et al.Integrated approach to evaluate rock brittleness and fracability for hydraulic fracturing optimization in shale gas[R]. SPE 195196-MS, 2019.
[16] OWENS M, SILVA J, VOLKMAR M.A spirit of change sweeps the Denver-Julesberg Basin: Lowering $/BOE using a novel completion strategy[R]. SPE 181457-MS, 2016.
[17] WEDDLE P, GRIFFIN L, PEARSON C M.Mining the Bakken Ⅱ: Pushing the envelope with extreme limited entry perforating[R]. SPE 189880-MS, 2018.
[18] SRINIVASAN K, AJISAFE F, ALIMAHOMED F, et al.Is there anything called too much proppant?[R]. SPE 191800-MS, 2018.
[19] MAYERHOFER M, ODUBA O, AGARWAL K, et al.A cost/benefit review of completion choices in the Williston Basin using a hybrid physics-based-modeling/multivariate-analysis approach[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2019, 34(1): 24-40.
[20] SCANLAN W P, PIERSKALLA K J, SOBERNHEIM D W.Optimization of Bakken well completions in a multivariate world[R]. SPE 189868-MS, 2018.
[21] RATERMAN K T, LIU Y, WARREN L.Analysis of a drained rock volume: An Eagle Ford example[R]. URTEC 2019-263, 2019.
[22] RATERMAN K T, FARRELL H E, MORA O S.Sampling a stimulated rock volume: An Eagle Ford example[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2018, 21(4): 927-941.
[23] FU W, MORRIS J, FU P, et al.Developing upscaling approach for swarming hydraulic fractures observed at hydraulic fracturing test site through multiscale simulations[R]. SPE 199689-MS, 2020.
[24] MOHAGHEGH S D.Shale descriptive analytics: Which parameters are controlling production in shale[R]. SPE 196226-MS, 2019.
[25] RODRIGUEZ A.Inferences of two dynamic processes on recovery factor and well spacing for a shale oil reservoir[R]. SPE 197089-MS, 2019.
[26] RASSENFOSS S.Looking for fracturing sand that is cheap and local[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2019, 71(5): 32-36.
[27] SCHERZ R Y, PRADHAN Y, RAINBOLT M F.Mitigation for fracture driven interaction: A Midland Basin case study[R]. SPE 199686-MS, 2020.
[28] DANESHY A, KING G.Horizontal well frac-driven interactions: Types, consequences, and damage mitigation[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2019, 71(6): 45-47.
[29] STARK P, TRAN J B, MOGCK D, et al.Improving completions immediately: An applied methodology for real-time optimization[R]. SPE 199698-MS, 2020
[30] SULLIVAN M, ZANGANEH B, SPRINGER A, et al.Post-fracture pressure decay: A novel (and free) stage-level assessment method[R]. URTEC 2019-970, 2019.
[31] SESETTY V, GHASSEMI A.Modeling dense-arrays of hydraulic fracture clusters: Fracture complexity, net pressure and model calibration[R]. URTEC 2019-1128, 2019.
[32] TAMIMI N, SAMANI S, MINAEI M, et al.An artificial intelligence decision support system for unconventional field development design[R]. URTEC 2019-249, 2019.
[33] LAGRANGE E.Developing a digital twin: The roadmap for oil and gas optimization[R]. SPE 195790-MS, 2019.
[34] 刘合. 石油工程大数据应用的挑战与发展[R]. 北京: 2019中国石油集团咨询中心年度会议, 2019.
LIU He.Challenges and progresses of big data application in petroleum engineering[R]. Beijing: 2019 Annual Forum of CNPC Advisory Center, 2019.
[35] FRAGOSO A, SELVAN K, AGUILERA R.Breaking a paradigm can oil recovery from shales be larger than oil recovery from conventional reservoirs the answer is yes[R]. SPE 189784-MS, 2018.
[36] DEAN E, FRENCH J, PITTS M, et al.Practical EOR agents: There is more to EOR than CO2[R]. SPE 190424-MS, 2018.
[37] MAHZARI P, OELKERS E, MITCHELL T, et al.An improved understanding about CO2 EOR and CO2 storage in liquid-rich shale reservoirs[R]. SPE 195532-MS, 2019.
[38] 李国欣, 王峰, 皮学军, 等. 非常规油气藏地质工程一体化数据优化应用的思考与建议[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(2): 147-152.
LI Guoxin, WANG Feng, PI Xuejun, et al.Optimized application of geology-engineering integration data of unconventional oil and gas reservoirs[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(2): 147-152.
[39] 刘合, 孟思炜, 苏健, 等. 对中国页岩气压裂工程技术发展和工程管理的思考与建议[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(4): 1-7.
LIU He, MENG Siwei, SU Jian, et al.Reflections and suggestions on the development and engineering management of shale gas fracturing technology in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(4): 1-7.
文章导航

/