石油勘探与开发 >

2019 , Vol. 46 >Issue 6: 1015 - 1026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11698/PED.2019.06.01

油气勘探

中国致密油气发展特征与方向

  • 孙龙德 ,
  • 邹才能 ,
  • 贾爱林 ,
  • 位云生 ,
  • 朱如凯 ,
  • 吴松涛 ,
  • 郭智
展开
  • 1. 黑龙江省致密油和泥岩油成藏研究重点实验室,黑龙江大庆 163712;
    2. 大庆油田有限责任公司,黑龙江大庆 163002;
    3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
孙龙德（1962-）,男,山东寿光人,博士,中国工程院院士,主要从事油气田开发工程与石油地质方面的研究。地址：黑龙江省大庆市,中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司,邮政编码：163002。E-mail：sld@petrochina.com.cn

收稿日期: 2019-02-15

  修回日期: 2019-08-16

  网络出版日期: 2019-11-20

基金资助

国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”（2016ZX05015,2016ZX05047,2017ZX05001）

收起

Development characteristics and orientation of tight oil and gas in China

  • SUN Longde ,
  • ZOU Caineng ,
  • JIA Ailin ,
  • WEI Yunsheng ,
  • ZHU Rukai ,
  • WU Songtao ,
  • GUO Zhi
Expand
  • 1. Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory for the Study of Tight Oil and Shale Oil Accumulation, Daqing 163712, China;
    2. PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd., Daqing 163002, China;
    3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;

Received date: 2019-02-15

  Revised date: 2019-08-16

  Online published: 2019-11-20

Fold

摘要

系统梳理中国致密油气发展历程,提升总结勘探开发理论认识,客观对比中美地质条件及开发技术,明确了中国致密油气的勘探开发进展与所处的发展阶段,并从理论技术、工艺方法、开发政策等方面对中国致密油气的未来发展进行了展望。近10年来,依靠勘探开发实践和科技、管理创新,中国致密油气取得重大突破,探索了致密油气形成与分布等成藏规律,形成了“多级降压”、“人工油气藏”等开发理论认识,创新集成了富集区优选与井网部署、提高单井产量及采收率、低成本开发等技术系列,推动了致密油气的储量与产量的快速上升。但受控于沉积环境和构造背景,中国致密油气相比于北美,储集层连续性差、开发难度大、经济效益差,在储集层识别精度和压裂改造工艺等方面还存在一定差距。未来中国应进一步优化资源评价方法,攻关高精度三维地震、人工油气藏、智能工程等关键工程技术,创新发展新一代提高单井产量与提高采收率理论技术,积极争取致密油气财税补贴政策,促进致密油气快速规模发展。图5表8参40

关键词： 致密油气; 发展历程; 理论技术进展; 人工油气藏; 提高采收率; 发展方向

本文引用格式

孙龙德 , 邹才能 , 贾爱林 , 位云生 , 朱如凯 , 吴松涛 , 郭智 . 中国致密油气发展特征与方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019 , 46(6) : 1015 -1026 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2019.06.01

Abstract

Through reviewing the development history of tight oil and gas in China, summarizing theoretical understandings in exploration and development, and comparing the geological conditions and development technologies objectively in China and the United States, the progress and stage of tight oil and gas exploration and development in China have been clarified, and the future development orientation of theory and technology, process methods and development policy for tight oil and gas in China have been envisaged. In nearly a decade, relying on the exploration and development practice, science and technology research and management innovation, huge breakthroughs have been made in the exploration and development of tight oil and gas in China. The laws of formation, distribution and accumulation of tight oil and gas have been researched, the development theories such as “multi-stage pressure drop” and “man-made reservoirs” have been established, and several technology series, including enrichment regions selection, well pattern deployment, single well production and recovery factor enhancement, and low cost development, have been innovated and integrated. All those promote the rapid rise of both reserves and production of tight oil and gas. However, limited by the sedimentary environment and tectonic background, compared with North America, China’s tight oil and gas reservoirs are worse in continuity, more difficult to develop and poorer in economic efficiency. Moreover, there are still some gaps in reservoir identification accuracy and fracturing technology between China and North America. In the future, boosting the rapid development of tight oil and gas, Chinese oil and gas companies should further improve the resource evaluation method, tackle key technologies such as high-precision 3D seismic interpretation, man-made reservoir, and intelligent engineering, innovate theories and technologies to enhance single well production and recovery rate, and actively endeavor to get the finance and tax subsidy on tight oil and gas.

Key words： tight oil and gas; development history; theoretical and technological advancement; man-made oil and gas reservoir; enhancing recovery factor; development orientation

参考文献

[1] 邹才能, 杨智, 何东博, 等. 常规-非常规天然气理论、技术及前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4): 575-587.
ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, HE Dongbo, et al.Theory, technology and prospects of conventional and unconventional natural gas[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4): 575-587.
[2] 孙龙德, 方朝亮, 李峰, 等. 中国沉积盆地油气勘探开发实践与沉积学研究进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(4): 385-396.
SUN Longde, FANG Chaoliang, LI Feng, et al.Petroleum exploration and development practices of sedimentary basins in China and research progress of sedimentology[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(4): 385-396.
[3] 邹才能, 陶士振, 侯连华, 等. 非常规油气地质学[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2014.
ZOU Caineng, TAO Shizhen, HOU Lianhua, et al.Unconventional petroleum geology[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2014.
[4] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 李建忠, 等. 致密油地质评价方法: GB/T 34906—2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社.
ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, LI Jianzhong, et al.Geological evaluation method of tight oil: GB/T 34906—2017[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press.
[5] 胡素云, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 中国陆相致密油效益勘探开发[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4): 737-748.
HU Suyun, ZHU Rukai, WU Songtao, et al.Profitable exploration and development of continental tight oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4): 737-748.
[6] US Energy Information Administration(EIA). Outlook for shale gas and tight oil development in the US[EB/OL]. (2013-05-21)[2017-12-01]. https://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/sieminski_05212013.pdf
[7] 谭中国, 卢涛, 刘艳侠, 等. 苏里格气田“十三五”期间提高采收率技术思路[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(3): 30-40.
TAN Zhongguo, LU Tao, LIU Yanxia, et al.Technical ideas of recovery enhancement in the Sulige Gasfield during the 3th Five-Year Plan[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(3): 30-40.
[8] 卢涛, 刘艳侠, 武力超, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田致密砂岩气藏稳产难点与对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(6): 43-52.
LU Tao, LIU Yanxia, WU Lichao, et al.Challenges to and countermeasures for the production stabilization of tight sandstone gas reservoirs of the Sulige Gasfield, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(6): 43-52.
[9] 邹才能, 李熙喆, 朱如凯, 等. 致密砂岩气地质评价方法: GB/T 30501—2014[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社.
ZOU Caineng, LI Xizhe, ZHU Rukai, et al.Geological evaluation method of tight sand gas: GB/T 30501—2014[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press.
[10] 庞雄奇. 中国西部叠合盆地深部油气勘探面临的重大挑战及其研究方法与意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(5): 517-541.
PANG Xiongqi.Key challenges and research methods of petroleum exploration in the deep of superimposed basins in western China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(5): 517-541.
[11] LEVORSEN A I.Geology of petroleum[M]. 2nd ed. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1967.
[12] 杨华, 付金华, 刘新社, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界致密气成藏条件与勘探开发[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(3): 295-303.
YANG Hua, FU Jinhua, LIU Xinshen, et al.Accumulation conditions and exploration and development of tight gas in the Upper Paleozoic of the Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3): 295-303.
[13] 李鹭光. 四川盆地天然气勘探开发技术进展与发展方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2011, 31(1): 1-6.
LI Luguang.Technical progress and developing orientation in natural gas exploration and development in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(1): 1-6.
[14] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望: 以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 173-187.
ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, WU Songtao, et al.Types, characteristics, genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations: Taking tight oil and gas in China as an instance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 173-187.
[15] 邹才能, 杨智, 陶士振, 等. 纳米油气与源储共生型油气聚集[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(1): 13-26.
ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, TAO Shizhen, et al.Nano-hydrocarbon and the accumulation in coexisting source and reservoir[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(1): 13-26.
[16] 赵政璋, 杜金虎. 致密油气[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2012: 100-128.
ZHAO Zhengzhang, DU Jinhu.Tight oil & gas[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2012: 100-128.
[17] 邹才能, 丁云宏, 卢拥军, 等. “人工油气藏”理论、技术与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1): 144-154.
ZOU Caineng, DING Yunhong, LU Yongjun, et al.Concept, technology and practice of “man-made reservoirs” development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 144-154.
[18] 吴胜和. 储层表征与建模[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2010.
WU Shenghe.Reservoir characterization & modeling[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2010.
[19] 贾爱林. 中国储层地质模型20年[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(1): 181-188.
JIA Ailin.Research achievements on reservoir geological modeling of China in the past two decades[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(1): 181-188.
[20] 贾爱林, 程立华. 数字化精细油藏描述程序方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6): 623-627.
JIA Ailin, CHENG Lihua.The technique of digital detailed reservoir characterization[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6): 623-627.
[21] 中国石油天然气股份有限公司. 长庆油田分公司2017年度气田开发工作报告[R]. 西安: 长庆油田分公司, 2018.
Petrochina. 2017 gas field development report of Changqing oilfield company[R]. Xi’an: Changqing Oilfield Company, 2018.
[22] 郭建林, 郭智, 崔永平, 等. 大型致密砂岩气田采收率计算方法[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(12): 1389-1396.
GUO Jianlin, GUO Zhi, CUI Yongping, et al.Recovery factor calculation method of giant tight sandstone gas field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(12): 1389-1396.
[23] 李海平, 贾爱林, 何东博, 等. 中国石油的天然气开发技术进展及展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2010, 30(1): 5-7.
LI Haiping, JIA Ailin, HE Dongbo, et al.Technology advancement and prospect of natural gas development in Petrochina[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010, 30(1): 5-7.
[24] 马新华, 贾爱林, 谭健, 等. 中国致密砂岩气开发工程技术与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(5): 572-579.
MA Xinhua, JIA Ailin, TAN Jian, et al.Tight sand gas development technologies and practices in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(5): 572-579.
[25] 杨华, 牛小兵, 徐黎明, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7段页岩油勘探潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(4): 511-520.
YANG Hua, NIU Xiaobing, XU Liming, et al.Exploration potential of shale oil in Chang7 Member, Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(4): 511-520.
[26] ZHANG H L, JANSON X, LIU L, et al.Lithofacies, diagenesis, and reservoir quality evaluation of Wolfcamp unconventional succession in the Midland Basin, West Texas[R]. Houston, Texas: AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, 2017.
[27] OLMSTEAD R, KUGLER I. Halftime in the Permian: An IHS energy discussion[EB/OL]. (2017-06-01)[2018-01-01]. https://cdn.ihs. com/www/pdf/Halftime-in-the-Permian.pdf.
[28] DYNI R J.Geology and resources of some world oil-shale deposits: Scientific investigations report 2005-5294[EB/OL]. (2006-06-01) [2017-12-01]. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2005/5294/pdf/sir5294_508.pdf.
[29] US Geological Survey(USGS). Assessment of undiscovered oil resources in the Bakken and Three Forks Formations, Williston Basin Province, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota, Fact Sheet 2013-3013[EB/OL]. (2013-04-01)[2017-12-01]. https://pubs.usgs.gov/ fs/2013/3013/fs2013-3013.pdf.
[30] IEA. International energy outlook 2017[EB/OL]. (2017-09-14)[2017- 12-20]. http:/www.eia.gov/ieo.
[31] SLATT R M, O’BRIEN N R, ROMERO A M, et al. Eagle Ford condensed section and its oil and gas storage and flow potential[EB/OL]. (2012-05-27)[2017-12-01]. http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2012/80245slatt/ndx_slatt.pdf.
[32] 郭智, 孙龙德, 贾爱林, 等. 辫状河相致密砂岩气藏三维地质建模[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(1): 76-83.
GUO Zhi, SUN Longde, JIA Ailin, et al.3D geological modeling for a tight sand gas reservoir of braided river facies[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(1): 76-83.
[33] US Energy Information Administration(EIA). Annual energy outlook 2017 with projection to 2050[EB/OL]. (2017-01-05)[2017-12-01]. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2017).pdf.
[34] US Energy Information Administration(EIA). Drilling productivity report for key tight oil and shale regions[EB/OL]. (2018-03-01) [2018-03-01]. https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/pdf/dpr-full.pdf.
[35] SKINNER O, CANTER L, SONNENFELD D M, et al. Discovery of “Pronghorn” and “Lewis and Clark” fields: Sweet-spots within the Bakken petroleum system producing from the Sanish/Pronghorn Member NOT the Middle Bakken or Three Forks[EB/OL]. (2015-04-01)[2017-12-01]. http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/pdfz/ abstracts/pdf/2014/90187cspg/abstracts/ndx_skinn.pdf.html.
[36] REBECCA L J. The Pronghorn Member of the Bakken Formation, Williston Basin, USA: Lithology, stratigraphy, reservoir properties[EB/OL]. (2013-05-01)[2017-12-01]. http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/pdfz/documents/2013/50808johnson/ndx_johnson.pdf. html.
[37] National Energy Board.Energy briefing note, tight oil developments in the western Canadian Sedimentary Basin[R]. Calgary: National Energy Board, 2011.
[38] US Energy Information Administration(EIA). Technically recoverable shale oil and shale gas resources: An assessment of 137 shale formations in 41 countries outside the United states[EB/OL]. (2013- 06-01)[2017-12-01]. https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/ pdf/overview.pdf.
[39] 冉富强, 李雁, 陈显举, 等. 致密油气藏储层评价技术[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2017(18): 177-178.
RAN Fuqiang, LI Yan, CHEN Xianju, et al.Reservoirs evaluation technologies of tight oil and gas[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2017(18): 177-178.
[40] 武力超, 朱玉双, 刘艳侠, 等. 矿权叠置区内多层系致密气藏开发技术探讨: 以鄂尔多斯盆地神木气田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(6): 826-832.
WU Lichao, ZHU Yushuang, LIU Yanxia, et al.Development techniques of multi-layer tight gas reservoirs in mining rights overlapping blocks: A case study of Shenmu gas field, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(6): 826-832.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

版权所有：《石油勘探与开发》编辑部；《石油勘探与开发（英文）》编辑部
地址：北京市海淀区学院路20号，中国石油勘探开发研究院数据中心605室　

京ICP备15044687号    技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司