油气田开发

CO2混相与非混相共同驱极限井距计算方法

  • 迟杰 ,
  • 鞠斌山 ,
  • 吕广忠 ,
  • 张星 ,
  • 汪佳蓓
展开
  • 1. 中国石油大学胜利学院基础科学学院,山东东营 257061; 
    2. 中国地质大学(北京)能源学院,北京 100083;
     3. 非常规天然气能源地质评价与开发工程北京市重点实验室,北京 100083; 
    4. 中国石化胜利油田分公探开发研究院,山东东营 257015;
    5. 中国石化胜利油田分公司石油工程技术研究院,山东东营 257000; 
    6. 重庆科技学院石油与天然气工程学院,重庆 401331)
迟杰(1979-),男,山东烟台人,博士,中国石油大学胜利学院讲师,主要从事油气田开发工程、应用数学方面的研究。地址:山东省东营市北二路271号,中国石油大学胜利学院基础科学学院,邮政编码:257061。E-mail: chijie7980@163.com
联系作者简介:鞠斌山(1970-),男,山东青州人,中国地质大学(北京)教授,主要从事油气田开发工程方面的教学和研究工作。地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号,中国地质大学(北京)能源学院,邮政编码:100083。E-mail: jubs2936@163.com

收稿日期: 2016-06-21

  修回日期: 2017-06-26

  网络出版日期: 2017-09-18

基金资助

中央高校基本科研业务费(2652015142)资助

A computational method of critical well spacing of CO2 miscible and immiscible concurrent flooding

  • CHI Jie ,
  • JU Binshan ,
  • LYU Guangzhong ,
  • ZHANG Xing ,
  • WANG Jiabei
Expand
  • 1. School of Basic Sciences, Shengli College of China University of Petroleum, Dongying 257061, China; 
    2. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Geological Evaluation and Development Engineering of Unconventional Natural Gas Energy, Beijing 100083, China; 
    4. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Shengli Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Dongying 257015, China; 
    5. Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering Technology, Shengli Oilfield Company, SINOPEC, Dongying 257000, China; 
    6. School of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Chongqing Institute of Technology, Chongqing 401331, China

Received date: 2016-06-21

  Revised date: 2017-06-26

  Online published: 2017-09-18

摘要

基于非达西渗流理论,考虑原油黏度、油相及CO2相启动压力梯度的变化,建立了CO2混相与非混相共同驱渗流数学模型,用传质-扩散-吸附方程求解混相波及区内CO2浓度的分布,用特征线法求解非混相波及区内饱和度方程,推导出特低渗透油藏CO2混相与非混相共同驱极限井距计算方法。以F142和G89两个区块为例,进行极限井距计算,结果表明:①极限井距随注气压力的增大而增大,随注气速度的增大而减小;②纯CO2渗流区长度对极限井距的贡献最大,CO2-原油有效传质区域及非混相波及区长度对极限井距的贡献居中,纯油区的贡献最小,注气速度越大,纯CO2渗流区与CO2-原油有效传质区域及非混相波及区长度差距越小,随着注气速度减小,差距越来越大,此规律表现得更加显著;③混相波及区与非混相波及区的压力下降梯度有着显著的差异,混相波及区中CO2-原油有效传质区域的压力下降梯度比非混相波及区大。图7参15

本文引用格式

迟杰 , 鞠斌山 , 吕广忠 , 张星 , 汪佳蓓 . CO2混相与非混相共同驱极限井距计算方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017 , 44(5) : 771 -778 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2017.05.12

Abstract

Based on the theory of non-Darcy seepage, a mathematical model for CO2 miscible and immiscible concurrent flooding considering changes of oil viscosity and threshold pressure gradient of oil and CO2 is established. A computational method of critical well spacing of CO2 miscible and immiscible concurrent flooding in ultra-low permeability reservoirs is deduced by solving the distribution of CO2 concentration in miscible flooding area with the mass transfer-diffusion-absorption equation and solving the saturation equation of immiscible affected area with characteristic line method. A critical well spacing example is built in the F142 and G89 reservoir blocks and the results show: (1) The critical well spacing increases with gas injection pressure, while decreases with gas injection speed; (2) The contribution of length in pure CO2 seepage area to the critical well spacing is the largest, the contribution of length in CO2-Oil effective mass transfer area and immiscible affected area is secondary, the contribution of pure oil area is the least, the gap of length between pure CO2 seepage area and CO2-Oil effective mass transfer area and immiscible affected area decreases with gas injection speed and it increases with the decreasing of gas injection speed, meanwhile, the law is more significant; (3) Pressure drop gradient of miscible affected area is significantly different from that of immiscible affected area and pressure drop gradient of CO2-Oil effective mass transfer area in miscible affected area is bigger than that of immiscible affected area.

参考文献

[1] 张英芝. 特低渗透油藏开发技术研究[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2004: 3-5.
ZHANG Yingzhi. Ultra-low permeability reservoirs development technology research[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2004: 3-5.
[2] 沈平平, 江怀友. 温室气体提高采收率的资源化利用及地下埋存[J]. 中国工程科学, 2009, 11(5): 55-59.
SHEN Pingping, JIANG Huaiyou. Utilization of greenhouse gas as resource in EOR and storage it underground[J]. China Engineering Science, 2009, 11(5): 55-59.
[3] 苏玉亮. 混相驱替机理[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2009: 48-50.
SU Yuliang. Miscible flooding mechanism[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2009: 48-50.
[4] 秦积舜, 韩海水, 刘晓蕾. 美国CO 2 驱油技术应用及启示[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(2): 209-216.
QIN Jishun, HAN Haishui, LIU Xiaolei. Application and enlightenment of carbon dioxide flooding in the United States of America[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(2): 209-216.
[5] 李松泉, 程林松, 李秀生, 等. 特低渗透油藏合理井距确定新方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 30(5): 93-96.
LI Songquan, CHENG Lingsong, LI Xiusheng, et al. A new method for determing reasonable well spacing in ultra-low permeability reservoirs[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2008, 30(5): 93-96.
[6] 孙黎娟, 吴凡, 赵卫华, 等. 油藏启动压力的规律研究与应用[J]. 断块油气田, 1998, 5(5): 30-33.
SUN Lijuan, WU Fan, ZHAO Weihua, et al. The study and application of reservoir start-up pressure[J]. Fault Block Oil & Gas Field, 1998, 5(5): 30-33.
[7] 王端平, 时佃海, 李相远, 等. 低渗透砂岩油藏开发主要矛盾机理及合理井距分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30(1): 87-89.
WANG Duanping, SHI Dianhai, LI Xiangyuan, et al. The main challenges and the reasonable well spacing for the development of low-permeability sandstone reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003, 30(1): 87-89.
[8] 苏玉亮, 任龙, 赵广渊, 等. 低渗透油藏考虑压裂的合理注采井距研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(6): 72-78.
SU Yuliang, REN Long, ZHAO Guangyuan, et al. Study on reasonable spacing between injection and production wells considering fracturing in low permeability reservoirs[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2015, 37(6): 72-78.
[9] 汪全林, 柴世超, 程自力, 等. 基于两相流低渗油藏合理注采井距确定方法[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2012, 36(4): 45-48.
WANG Quanlin, CHAI Shichao, CHENG Zili, et al. Determination of reasonable well spacing in low permeability reservoir based on two phase flow[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2012, 36(4): 45-48.
[10] 鞠斌山, 秦积舜, 李治平, 等. 二氧化碳-AB36原油体系最小混相压力预测模型[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 274-277.
JU Binshan, QIN Jishun, LI Zhiping, et al. A prediction model for the minimum miscible pressure of the CO 2 -crude oil system[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 274-277.
[11] 程林松. 高等渗流力学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2011: 266-268.
CHENG Linsong. Higher percolation mechanics[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2011: 266-268.
[12] 鞠斌山. 变油藏物性渗流力学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2012: 60-65.
JU Binshan. Variable reservoir property seepage mechanics[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2012: 60-65.
[13] CHUNG F T H, JONES R A, NGUYEN H T. Measurements and correlations of the physical properties of CO 2 /heavy-crude-oil mixtures[R]. SPE 15080, 1988.
[14] 吕成远, 王建, 孙志刚. 低渗透砂岩油藏渗流启动压力梯度实验研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2002, 29(2): 86-89.
LYU Chengyuan, WANG Jian, SUN Zhigang. An experimental study on starting pressure gradient of fluids flow in low permeability sandstone porous media[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2002, 29(2): 86-89.
[15] 朱义东, 张伟, 刘伟新, 等. 地层破裂压力计算模型及分析[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2013, 27(2): 92-94.
ZHU Yidong, ZHANG Wei, LIU Weixin, et al. A computational model and analysis on formation breakdown pressure[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2013, 27(2): 92-94.
文章导航

/