油气勘探

台缘微生物礁结构特点及储集层主控因素——以塔里木盆地阿克苏地区下寒武统肖尔布拉克组为例

  • 白莹 ,
  • 罗平 ,
  • 王石 ,
  • 周川闽 ,
  • 翟秀芬 ,
  • 王珊 ,
  • 杨宗玉
展开
  • 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083;
    2. 北京大学地球与空间科学学院,北京 100871;
    3. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
白莹(1990-),女,天津静海人,中国石油勘探开发研究院与北京大学联合培养在读博士研究生,主要从事碳酸盐沉积储集层研究。地址:北京市海淀区学院路20号,中国石油勘探开发研究院塔里木分院,邮政编码:100083。E-mail: baiying81@163.com

收稿日期: 2016-05-16

  修回日期: 2017-03-13

  网络出版日期: 2017-05-26

基金资助

国家油气重大专项(2016ZX05004-001); 中国石油天然气股份有限公司勘探开发研究院院级超前基础研究项目(2015yj-09)

Structure characteristics and major controlling factors of platform margin microbial reef reservoirs: A case study of Xiaoerbulak Formation, Lower Cambrian, Aksu area, Tarim Basin, NW China

  • BAI Ying ,
  • LUO Ping ,
  • WANG Shi ,
  • ZHOU Chuanmin ,
  • ZHAI Xiufen ,
  • WANG Shan ,
  • YANG Zongyu
Expand
  • 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
    3. Petroleum Exploration & Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China;

Received date: 2016-05-16

  Revised date: 2017-03-13

  Online published: 2017-05-26

摘要

基于5条野外露头剖面、162块薄片、12块扫描电镜(SEM)样品及52套孔渗物性数据等资料,分析塔里木盆地阿克苏地区下寒武统肖尔布拉克组台缘微生物礁的结构特点及储集层主控因素。台缘由小型微生物礁群组成,单一礁体可分为前礁相、礁前相、礁脊相、礁后相,镜下可见礁岩具有不同的显微结构。微生物礁发育微生物结构储集空间和非生物结构储集空间,前者包括窗格孔、格架孔、铸模孔及超大溶孔,后者包括微裂缝和缝合线。孔渗数据统计结果表明:于提希剖面微生物礁孔隙度基本小于5%,渗透率一般小于1.0×10-3 μm2,主要为特低孔特低渗储集层,而苏盖特布拉克剖面孔隙度多为3%~10%,渗透率为(0.1~50.0)×10-3 μm2,整体跨度较大,且礁内物性非均质性较强,主要为低—中孔、低—中渗储集层。说明不同微生物礁的物性特征具有较大的差异,同一微生物礁内亦具有明显的储集非均质性。古地貌特征控制微生物礁的发育,沉积作用控制相带的展布及原生孔隙的发育,而溶蚀作用受控于古地貌特征和沉积作用,最终决定微生物礁储集层孔隙的演化。图9参29

本文引用格式

白莹 , 罗平 , 王石 , 周川闽 , 翟秀芬 , 王珊 , 杨宗玉 . 台缘微生物礁结构特点及储集层主控因素——以塔里木盆地阿克苏地区下寒武统肖尔布拉克组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017 , 44(3) : 349 -358 . DOI: 10.11698/PED.2017.03.04

Abstract

The structure characteristics and major controlling factors of platform margin microbial reef reservoirs in the Lower Cambrian Xiaoerbulak Formation in the Aksu area, Tarim Basin were analyzed based on 5 outcrop sections, 162 thin sections, 12 SEM samples, 52 sets of porosity and permeability data. Macroscopically, small-scale microbial reefs form the platform margin. A single microbial reef has several microbial reef progradation complexes, including reef front, fore reef, reef crest, and back reef, but microscopically, they have different kinds of microstructures. The reservoir spaces in the reefs can be divided into microbial structure reservoir space, including fenestral, frame, moldic, and oversized dissolution pores, and non-microbial structure reservoir space, including microcracks and stylolites. The statistical results of porosity and permeability show that in the Yutixi Section, porosities and permeability of the microbial reef reservoirs are generally below 5% and 1.0×10-3 μm2 respectively, characteristics of extremely low porosity and permeability reservoirs; while the reef reservoirs in the Sugaitebulake Section have a wide porosity range between 3% and 10%, and permeability range between 0.1×10-3 μm2 and 50×10-3 μm2, and strong heterogeneity, are low-medium porosity, low-medium permeability reservoirs. This demonstrates different microbial reefs have big differences in physical properties, and even the reservoir in the same reef has obvious heterogeneity. Paleotopography controls the formation of microbial reefs and sedimentation controls the facies distribution and the primary porosity development. Dissolution, controlled by the former two factors, finally decides evolution of reservoir pores.

参考文献

[1] RIDING R. Structure and composition of organic reefs and carbonate mud mounds: Concepts and categories[J]. Earth Science Reviews, 2002, 58(1/2): 163-231.
[2] RIDING R. Microbial carbonates: The geological record of calcified bacterial-algal mats and biofilms[J]. Sedimentology, 2000, 47(Supp. 1): 179-214.
[3] 罗平, 王石, 李朋威, 等. 微生物碳酸盐岩油气储层研究现状与展望[J]. 沉积学报, 2013, 31(5): 807-823.
LUO Ping, WANG Shi, LI Pengwei, et al. Review and prospectives of microbial carbonate reservoirs[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2013, 31(5): 807-823.
[4] 宋金民, 罗平, 杨式升, 等. 塔里木盆地下寒武统微生物碳酸盐岩储集层特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(4): 404-413.
SONG Jinmin, LUO Ping, YANG Shisheng, et al. Reservoirs of Lower Cambrian microbial carbonates, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(4): 404-413.
[5] 熊剑飞, 余腾孝, 曹自成, 等. 塔里木盆地覆盖区寒武系生物地层研究新进展[J]. 地层学杂志, 2011, 35(4): 419-430.
XIONG Jianfei, YU Tengxiao, CAO Zicheng, et al. New advances in Cambrian biostratigraphy of the covered area of the Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2011, 35(4): 419-430.
[6] 赵宗举, 罗家洪, 张运波, 等. 塔里木盆地寒武纪层序岩相古地理[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(6): 937-948.
ZHAO Zongju, LUO Jiahong, ZHANG Yunbo, et al. Lithofacies paleogeography of Cambrian sequences in the Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(6): 937-948.
[7] 高志前, 樊太亮, 杨伟红, 等. 塔里木盆地下古生界碳酸盐岩台缘结构特征及其演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(3): 657-665.
GAO Zhiqian, FAN Tailiang, YANG Weihong, et al. Structure characteristics and evolution of the Eopaleozoic carbonate platform in Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(3): 657-665.
[8] 贾承造, 张师本, 吴绍祖, 等. 塔里木盆地及周边地层[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.
JIA Chengzao, ZHANG Shiben, WU Shaozu, et al. Stratigraphy of the Tarim Basin and adjacent areas[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2004.
[9] 范嘉松, 张维. 生物礁的基本概念、分类及识别特征[J]. 岩石学报, 1985, 1(3): 45-59.
FAN Jiasong, ZHANG Wei. On the basic concept and classification of organic reefs and their main identifying criteria[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 1985, 1(3): 45-59.
[10] JAMES N P, WOOD R. Reefs[C]//JAMES N P, DALRYMPLE R W. Facies models 4. Newfoundland: Geological Association of Canada, 2010: 421-447.
[11] 张荫本, 唐泽尧, 陈季高. 粘结岩分类及应用[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 1996, 19(4): 24-33.
ZHANG Yinben, TANG Zeyao, CHEN Jigao. Classification and application of the boundstone[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 1996, 19(4): 24-33.
[12] 梅冥相. 微生物碳酸盐岩分类体系的修订: 对灰岩成因结构分类体系的补充[J]. 地学前缘, 2007, 14(5): 222-234.
文章导航

/